25.07.2013 Views

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Our experimental results are presented in Fig. 6-9. This composite figure illustrates<br />

several results. First, in (a), it shows that the cloud fluorescence intensity closely matches a<br />

Gaussian fit, allowing measurement of the cloud center to within ±0.5 µm. This translates<br />

into a precision of electric field measurement of about 10 V/m at zero field. The remainder<br />

of this figure shows our measurements of the ˆx and ˆy electric fields as a function of Vtop.<br />

This enables us to determine the required compensation voltages, Vtop = 1.0±0.1 V and<br />

V5 = 1.3±0.3 V. Either V4 or V5 could be used for compensating ˆx. It was convenient to<br />

use V5, since V4 was already used for the secular frequency measurement. The estimated<br />

residual displacement of a single ion at these voltages is 0.2 µm. The nonlinear dependence<br />

of Eˆy on Vtop is due to the anharmonicity of the trap along ˆy, unaccounted for in the above<br />

simple model.<br />

6.3.3 Discussion<br />

Our measurements demonstrate that the compensation voltages for the trap do not agree<br />

well with the prediction of theory. At the theoretical compensation voltages V5 = 0 V<br />

and Vtop = -24.5 V, both Eˆx and Eˆy should be zero. We can determine the stray fields<br />

by measuring the actual values of Eˆx and Eˆy at these settings. At V5 = 0 V and with<br />

Eˆy = 0 (done by setting Vtop to 1 V), Eˆx was measured to be 30 V/m. Unfortunately,<br />

the trap was unstable at the ideal Vtop voltage. Instead of measuring Eˆy at this point, we<br />

extrapolate from Fig. 6-9, subfigure (c), that Eˆy ≈ 2000 V/m. This is in order-of-magnitude<br />

agreement with a parallel plate model, Eˆy = (Vexpt − Videal − V1)/d = 4200 V/m, where<br />

Vexpt is the measured compensation voltage (Vtop = 1.0 V), Videal is the ideal compensation<br />

value (Vtop = -24.5 V), and d is the distance between the top plate and the trap electrodes<br />

(d = 6.3 mm). Of course, these results depend on the agreement between our measured<br />

and predicted secular frequencies. They agree on a 5-10% level, with greater differences<br />

along ˆy, presumably due to the larger stray fields in that direction. These errors increase<br />

the uncertainty in our measurements a bit, but do not change the basic conclusions.<br />

The stray field along ˆx is comparable to those reported for 3-D ion traps [BMB + 98].<br />

However, that along ˆy is on the order of 10 times larger. This suggests significant charging<br />

on either the dielectric on the ion trap, the top plate, or the observation window. This is<br />

clearly a problem when using PCB ion traps. Indeed, these stray fields all but prevented<br />

direct loading at UHV pressures, necessitating the use of the helium buffer gas. This is<br />

mainly because the stray field degrades the trap depth, although it also can cause excessive<br />

rf heating. This is due to the fact that, in the cloud state, driven micromotion couples<br />

to the secular motion. Before compensation, the UHV cloud lifetime was less than 10 s.<br />

Following compensation, ion cloud lifetimes of 10 minutes at 10 −9 torr were observed. This<br />

pressure was limited by residual buffer-gas pressure. As stated above, Rogers 4350B is a<br />

UHV-compatible material after bakeout. Subsequent PCB traps in vacuum have attained<br />

pressures in the 10 −11 torr range.<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!