25.07.2013 Views

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in trap depth, however, comes decompensation of the trap. This fact is demonstrated by<br />

plotting cross sections of the pseudopotential for two different top plate voltages in Fig. 6-3.<br />

With Vtop = -25.4 V, we predict that the trap should be compensated, with a trap depth of<br />

1.0 eV. By contrast, Vtop = 15 V leads to a decompensated trap with a depth of 5.4 eV. A<br />

typical strategy, at least in the early period of surface-electrode ion trapping in our group,<br />

was to apply a voltage to the top plate to enhance the depth for initial trapping, and then<br />

gradually tune the compensation voltages and laser positions while reducing Vtop to the<br />

compensated value. In Fig. 6-4, we plot both the trap depth and the displacement of the<br />

trap center from the rf null as a function of the top plate voltage Vtop.<br />

We have seen the principle illustrated in Fig. 6-4 used in Ch. 5 already, in the macroion<br />

experiment, when a high trap depth was useful, but compensation was not critical to the<br />

measurements. In the atomic ion experiment of that chapter, fortunately, applying a voltage<br />

to the top plate was not required. The main caveat regarding this theoretical work is that the<br />

real compensated values may be quite different from the prediction due to stray fields. In the<br />

next section we will actually measure the stray fields and find quite different compensation<br />

voltages. However, it is still useful to have an idea of how the trap will behave if there are<br />

no stray fields; hopefully, they are but a perturbation on the controlled fields.<br />

6.2.2 Constructing and mounting the trap<br />

The trap was manufactured by Hughes Circuits in San Diego, CA. The electrodes are<br />

copper deposited on a fiberglass epoxy substrate, Rogers 4350B, which features a small<br />

rf loss tangent and UHV-compatibility. The thickness of the copper is about 25 µm. The<br />

minimum feature size is about 75 µm, which obviously limits the extension of the technology<br />

to microfabricated traps. In addition, the slot size was set at 850 µm since this was the<br />

smallest standard slot size. To reduce the accumulation of stray charges, the dielectric<br />

material in between rf electrodes was milled out by Hughes, and the sides plated with<br />

copper.<br />

The electrodes were polished using a multi-step diamond grid process. This process<br />

involves putting diamond grit paste containing diamond pieces of a given average size,<br />

together with a lubricating oil, onto a paper disk that is mechanically rotated. Polishing is<br />

done by moving the rotating disk across a trap that is mounted securely on a countertop.<br />

Following each polishing step, the trap is thoroughly cleaned with acetone and isopropanol<br />

and then a smaller-caliber grit paste is applied to a new disk for the next step. Diamond sizes<br />

ranging from 15 µm to 1 µm were used. Following this process, the trap was cleaned using<br />

the multi-step vacuum cleaning process described in Sec. 5.3.1. Fig. 6-5 is a photograph of<br />

the trap after the polishing and cleaning processes.<br />

Following the cleaning, the trap was mounted in the vacuum chamber using a breadboard-<br />

style component from Kimball <strong>Ph</strong>ysics that is secured to the “grabber grooves” that are a<br />

part of the spherical octagon vacuum chamber. The top plate, consisting for this experi-<br />

134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!