Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
VCoup = e2 c<br />
8πǫ0d 3x1x2,<br />
(5.6)<br />
where d is the mean ion-ion distance and x1 and x2 are, respectively, the displacements of<br />
the first and second ion from their equilibrium positions. Lower-order terms result in either<br />
a shift of the overall potential energy or a shift in the ions’ motional frequencies. Defining<br />
p1 and p2 to be the momentum operators for ions 1 and 2 respectively, the Hamiltonian for<br />
the motional states of the ions is<br />
HV = 1<br />
2m p2 1 + 1<br />
2m p2 2 + 1<br />
2 mω2 x 2 1 + 1<br />
2 mω2 x 2 2 + mg 2 x1x2, (5.7)<br />
where we assume that the ions have the same secular frequency ω and mass m, and have<br />
defined the coupling constant g as g 2 = VCoup/ (mx1x2). This Hamiltonian represents a<br />
coupled Harmonic oscillator; the rate ωex at which energy is exchanged between ions is<br />
given by<br />
ωex = g2<br />
. (5.8)<br />
ω<br />
The factor of ω in the denominator has important implications for the coupling rate<br />
in lattice ion traps. The physics of ion traps demands that for constant trap depth and<br />
stability parameter q, the drive frequency must increase as the inverse of the trap scale.<br />
In a lattice trap, d is directly proportional to the size of the trap, and may be considered<br />
one measure of the trap scale. Therefore, since g 2 ∝ 1/d 3 , ωex ∝ 1/d 2 in a lattice-style ion<br />
trap. In practice, this means that over reasonable length scales for d, ωex in a lattice trap<br />
is much lower than it would be if the ions occupied the same trap region, for instance in a<br />
linear ion trap. We plot this comparison in Fig. 5-15.<br />
5.6.2 Simulated J-coupling rate<br />
So far we have remarked only on the motional coupling rate ωex. A more relevant quantity<br />
is the simulated coupling rate J for quantum simulation of spin models. We first give a brief<br />
review of the spin model simulation scheme of Ref. [PC04b] described in Sec. 4.2.2. This<br />
scheme uses a laser that exerts a state-dependent force on trapped ions that are coupled by<br />
their Coulomb interaction. In the limit in which the Coulomb interaction is small compared<br />
to the trapping potential (which is the case for lattice traps), the coupling rate between the<br />
ions is given by<br />
J =<br />
e 2 cF 2<br />
8πǫ0m 2 d 3 ω 4,<br />
(5.9)<br />
where F is the magnitude of the state-dependent force and the other symbols are as defined<br />
above. For quantum simulation in a lattice trap, the frequency ω in Eq. 5.9 may be ωˆr<br />
or ωˆz. For the sake of argument here, we assume ω = ωˆr. F is assumed to be due to a<br />
124