25.07.2013 Views

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

macroscopic ions across lattice sites. In Sec. 5.6, we evaluate the trap design by computing<br />

the interaction rates as a function of trap scale in lattice traps. In Sec. 5.7, we conclude on<br />

this work.<br />

5.1 Proposals for quantum simulation in lattice ion traps<br />

Quantum information theorists have put forward several proposals for quantum operations<br />

in 2-D arrays of trapped ions. A 2000 paper from Cirac and Zoller suggests using ions in<br />

an array of microtraps to form the basis of a scalable quantum computer, in which an ion<br />

is moved from site to site within the array to interact with ions contained therein [CZ00].<br />

Later, as we discussed in Ch. 4, the spin model proposal of Porras and Cirac suggested<br />

that an array of microtraps could be used to implement quantum simulations of interesting<br />

physics such as spin frustration [PC04b].<br />

A subsequent proposal from Chiaverini and Lybarger [CW08] suggested using an array of<br />

microtraps to implement a 2-D quantum simulation. In their scheme, microcoils surrounding<br />

each lattice site address individual ions contained therein with microwave radiation, effecting<br />

single-qubit rotations. In addition, magnetic field gradients may be applied which serve the<br />

same purpose as the lasers in the Porras-Cirac scheme, generating state-dependent forces<br />

that translate into effective spin-spin interactions.<br />

The commonality between the two is the requirement of a 2-D array of trapped ions. The<br />

advantages of a 2-D array of microtraps are that the position of each ion is well-determined<br />

by the trap electrodes, and that, conceivably, dc compensation electrodes could be provided<br />

for each site. This is in contrast to a trap in which all ions are contained in the same<br />

potential well. In such a trap, the ion-ion distance can vary, especially near the edge of the<br />

crystal, and micromotion may pose a problem. However, in this chapter, we focus on arrays<br />

of Paul traps, or lattice ion traps.<br />

5.2 Lattice trap design and theory<br />

The model we study in this chapter is a layered planar rf electrode geometry that creates a<br />

2-D ion lattice. The ion trap consists of a planar electrode with a regular array of holes, held<br />

at a radiofrequency (rf) potential, mounted above a grounded planar electrode. A single ion<br />

is trapped above each hole in the rf electrode (Fig. 5-1). Ions will be preferentially loaded<br />

above the trap electrode at the intersection of the Doppler cooling and photoionization<br />

beams, allowing the user to write an arbitrary 2-D lattice structure. We view this design<br />

as an archetype of 2-D Paul trap arrays, in the sense that conclusions drawn about some<br />

properties of this trap may translate to other, similar, trap designs.<br />

Our lattice trap is an extension of the three-dimensional ring Paul trap [Gho95]. Follow-<br />

ing this reference, we first review the theory of the ring trap. The ring electrode geometry<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!