25.07.2013 Views

Tinisn Tor - View Site

Tinisn Tor - View Site

Tinisn Tor - View Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RPM<br />

Using the needle in the carb helped, but not much. Frustrated, I<br />

gave up; the Cub has been hanging in my garage ever since!<br />

After reading your article in the November 2001 issue of Model<br />

Airplane News concerning proper break-in, I purchased a test<br />

stand, hoping to figure out the problem with the 1.48, but I didn't.<br />

Before I ran the engine on the test stand, it had about 20 ounces<br />

of fuel through it. I was finally able to get the engine running at<br />

a rich four-cycle, but it took seven (!) turns to the rich side on<br />

the needle valve. This seems excessive. I've tried the old trick of<br />

using a small piece of fuel line around the needle valve to eliminate<br />

air leaks, but that didn't work either. When I go from seven<br />

to six turns out, the engine runs at peak rpm; there is no<br />

adjustability. I've considered replacing the carb but have no idea<br />

what to replace it with."<br />

Tom, it's a shame that you've had all this trouble with the MDS<br />

1.48 2-stroke engine; it seems like a good match for the Cub.<br />

The first thing that comes to mind is, what size fuel line are you<br />

using? You didn't say in your letter. Is it the large variety or the<br />

medium? If the latter, I suggest that you change to the larger<br />

size. Fuel-flow rates can exceed 2 ounces per minute at a rich<br />

"four-cycling" mode of operation with this engine, and that's a<br />

lot of flow for medium-size fuel line.<br />

Another possible cause of the problem is a restriction within<br />

the carburetor itself. A piece of flashing or a chip from manufacturing<br />

processes could be lodged somewhere within the metering<br />

jet tube. Remove the carb from the engine and carefully disassemble<br />

it, looking closely at the jet and idle-needle<br />

assembly/interface. With the primary needle valve removed,<br />

blow air or force fuel through the spraybar with a fuel<br />

bulb/syringe to see whether it behaves as if it's restricted. Try<br />

running a piece of small diameter music wire, or a pipe cleaner,<br />

through the spraybar.<br />

Last, make certain that the carb is tightly sealed to the<br />

neck of the crankcase; even a small air leak can lean a<br />

fuel mixture in a hurry.<br />

NEW BEARINGS FOR A MOKI<br />

D. Gibbs emails: "I have a three-year-old Moki<br />

1.8. It starts very easily, runs very reliably and<br />

has plenty of power. In mid-flight the other<br />

day, however, the engine stopped. The front<br />

[ball] bearing had failed, and a small piece of<br />

steel from the failed bearing had lodged at the<br />

very front of the crankcase housing, between<br />

it and the crankshaft. This caused only very<br />

minor damage to the housing, just behind<br />

the front bearing, and didn't damage the<br />

crankshaft at all. Using 600-grit wet/dry abrasive<br />

paper and some mild detergent mixed<br />

Ball bearings for crankshaft<br />

with water for lubrication, I was able to support—front and rear.<br />

completely clean up the inside of the<br />

housing. The large, rear ball bearing seems fine, but I figured<br />

that while I had the crankcase housing unbolted from the<br />

crankcase, I would change out both bearings. I had previously<br />

acquired replacement bearings from a local supplier, but unlike<br />

the unsealed originals, these are sealed. The new bearings are<br />

good-quality units from SKF. Would it be all right to replace the<br />

old bearings with the sealed units? Does it make a difference?"<br />

Mr. Gibbs, the seals on your replacement bearings won't hurt a<br />

114 MDDEL AIRPLANE NEW5<br />

thing, so install them as is; the grease will simply wash out during<br />

engine operation. If you don't like the slight frictional drag<br />

that the seals produce, simply remove them. Pry them from<br />

their seats with a tiny slot-type screwdriver (such as those used<br />

by jewelers), or use a hobby knife with a no. 11 blade. Don't<br />

touch (and possibly damage) the balls in the process (unlikely,<br />

since you'll be careful!). You can then wash out the grease with<br />

a solvent; I like to use lacquer thinner because it doesn't attract<br />

rust-producing water from the air (caused by hygroscopic<br />

action, as occurs with alcohol). Allow the bearings to dry naturally.<br />

Don't use compressed air to hasten drying; dirt in the<br />

airstream could contaminate the bearing assembly. Lubricate<br />

them with Marvel Mystery Oil and install them in your Moki.<br />

OLDER FOX ENGINES<br />

Mr. B. Jackson of Burlington, Ontario, Canada, writes: "I purchased<br />

four old Fox engines, including an early .78 with an<br />

exhaust baffle coupled to the carburetor. Two Fox .36s and a Fox<br />

.29 completed my find; all engines are new in the box! When I<br />

told my fellow club members that I was going to use one of the<br />

.36s in a Balsa USA Stick 40, they told me that Fox .29s and .36s<br />

were hard to start, the carburetors were difficult to adjust, and<br />

they really vibrate—especially in a lightly constructed model<br />

such as the Stick 40. They also informed me that the Fox .29<br />

and .36 require a minimum of 15-percent nitromethane in the<br />

fuel. Can you tell me how much of this information is fact and<br />

how much is fiction?"<br />

Mr. Jackson, it sounds as though your Fox .29 and .36s are<br />

equipped with cast-iron pistons and steel cylinders. This combination<br />

required several hours of patient break-in before the iron and<br />

steel were "bedded-in" and heat-cycle stress relief was achieved.<br />

The break-in fuel was very important to the "iron Fox"; it required<br />

a minimum of 25-percent castor oil (preferably 28 percent, with<br />

a low nitromethane percentage—about 5 percent).<br />

Although the Fox instructions were clearly written,<br />

many modelers ignored them and tried to fly the<br />

engine right out of the box; this never worked and<br />

gave rise to the problems described by your club<br />

members. In my opinion, this was not the fault of<br />

the manufacturer or the engine. Properly broken in,<br />

Fox engines are great runners.<br />

In reference to Fox carburetors, I'd like to note<br />

that Duke Fox produced more carburetor designs<br />

than any other manufacturer during the '60s and '70s.<br />

Another prolific producer of carb designs, SuperTigre, had to<br />

take a back seat to Fox in this arena. On at least one occasion,<br />

Peter Chinn (past engine columnist for Model Airplane<br />

News) was diligently trying to explain the workings of a<br />

recently released Fox carburetor while Duke Fox was promoting<br />

a newer version in an ad in the same issue!<br />

With proper break-in and fuel (5- to 10-percent nitro is<br />

plenty), Fox R/C .29s and .36s are easy to start, smooth running<br />

and very throttleable—if the owner follows Duke's detailed<br />

instructions. As an added benefit, a properly maintained "iron<br />

Fox" will run and last forever.<br />

Klotz Special Formula Products Inc., 7424 Freedom Way, Fort<br />

Wayne, IN 46817; (800) 242-0489; fax (219) 490-0490;<br />

www.klotzlube.com.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!