Chu92
Chu92
Chu92
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MAGNETIC FIELD<br />
ELECTRIC FIELD<br />
7'<br />
MAGNETIC AND ELECTRIC FIELDS can<br />
exert forces on atoms even though<br />
atoms are only slightly magnetic and<br />
electrically neutral. An atom in a mag-<br />
netic field will be drawn toward the re-<br />
gion of strongest field if the south pole<br />
of the atom points toward the north<br />
pole of the field. An atom in an electric<br />
fleM will be attracted toward the re-<br />
gion of highest field as well. The elec-<br />
trie field pulls on the negative charges<br />
in the atom, white repelling the positive<br />
charges. As a result of the new distribu-<br />
tkm of charge, the atom is attracted to-<br />
ward the positively charged rod.<br />
The magnitude of this scattering<br />
force is quite low. If an atom absorbs a<br />
single photon, its change in velocity is<br />
tiny compared with the average veloci-<br />
ty of atoms in a gas at room tempera-<br />
tare. (The change is on the order of one<br />
centimeter per second, the crawling<br />
speed of an ant, whereas an atom at<br />
room temperature moves at the speed<br />
of a supersonic jet.)<br />
This scattering force was first detect-<br />
ed in 1933, when Otto R Frisch used it<br />
to deflect a beam of sodium atoms. He<br />
prepared the atoms by vaporizing sodi-<br />
um in a container. To form the beam,<br />
he allowed the atoms to pass through a<br />
hole in the container and a series of<br />
slits. Once established, the beam was<br />
bombarded with light from a sodium<br />
lamp. Although, on average, each sodi-<br />
um atom absorbed only a single pho-<br />
ton, Frisch was able to detect a slight<br />
deflection of the beam.<br />
The scattering force that Frisch gen-<br />
erated was far too weak to capture<br />
\ atoms. Decades later workers realized<br />
that the photon-scattering rate could<br />
be increased to more than 10 million<br />
photons per second, corresponding to<br />
a force 100,000 tunes greater than the<br />
pull of gravity by the earth. The first<br />
dramatic demonstration of the scattering<br />
force on atoms was made by two<br />
separate groups led by Phillips and John<br />
L. Hall at the National Bureau of Standards.<br />
In 1985 they stopped a beam of<br />
atoms and reduced the temperature of<br />
the atoms from roughly 300 kelvins<br />
(room temperature) to 0.1 kelvin.<br />
The power of the scattering force<br />
attainable with lasers gave researchers<br />
hope that they could not only stop<br />
atoms but trap them as well. But attempts<br />
to configure several laser beams<br />
so that they could collect and concentrate<br />
atoms in some region of space<br />
seemed doomed to failure. According to<br />
a principle known as the Optical Earnshaw<br />
Theorem, it is impossible to fashion<br />
a light trap out of any configuration<br />
of light beams if the scattering force is<br />
proportional to the light intensity. The<br />
problem is that the beams cannot be<br />
arranged to generate only inward directed<br />
forces. Any light that enters a trapping<br />
region must eventually escape and<br />
must therefore carry outward directed<br />
forces as well. Even if Luke Skywalker<br />
were a physicist, the (scattering) force<br />
would not always be with him.<br />
F<br />
ortunately, an atomic trap can be<br />
based on another kind of force<br />
that light can exert on atoms. To<br />
understand this force, it is instructive<br />
to consider how small particles can be<br />
attracted to a positively charged object,<br />
such as a glass rod rubbed with cat's<br />
fur. The rod produces an electric field<br />
that polarizes the particle. Consequently,<br />
the average position of positive<br />
charges in the particle will be slightly<br />
farther away from the rod than the average<br />
position of the negative charges.<br />
This asymmetric distribution of charge<br />
is said to have a dipole moment. The attractive<br />
dipole force exerted by the electric<br />
field on the negative charges of the<br />
particle is stronger than the repulsive<br />
force on the positive charges. As a result,<br />
the particle is pulled toward the<br />
regions where the electric field is<br />
strongest. Notice that this force is analogous<br />
to the magnetic dipole force first<br />
used to trap neutrons and atoms. If the<br />
charge on the rod were negative, the<br />
electric field would induce a dipole moment<br />
of reversed polarity, and the particle<br />
would still be attracted to regions<br />
of high electric field.<br />
Because of the dipole force, atoms can<br />
be trapped by an electric field that has a<br />
local maximum of some point in space.<br />
Could such fields be produced by some<br />
clever arrangement of electric charges?<br />
For any system of fixed charges, the<br />
answer is no. Yet an electric fieldwith a<br />
local maximum can be achieved in a<br />
dynamic system. In particular, because I<br />
light is made up of rapidly oscillating<br />
electric and magnetic fields, a focused<br />
laser beam can produce an alternating<br />
electric field with a local maximum. \<br />
When the field interacts with an atom,, '<br />
it alters the distribution of electrons<br />
around the atom, thereby inducing an<br />
electric dipole moment. The atom will<br />
thus be attracted to the local maximum<br />
in the field, just as the charged particle<br />
was drawn toward the rod.<br />
The fact that the electric field changes<br />
rapidly does not present a problem. As<br />
the field changes polarity, the dipole<br />
moment of the atom also switches<br />
around. As long as the field changes at<br />
a rate slower than the natural oscillation<br />
frequencies of the atom, the dipole<br />
moment remains aligned with the field.<br />
The atom therefore continues to move<br />
toward the local maximum. As a result,<br />
this dipole force can be used to confine<br />
atoms. In 1968 Vladilen S. Letokhov<br />
first proposed that atoms could be<br />
trapped in a light beam using the dipole<br />
force, and 10 years later Arthur<br />
Ashkin of AT&T Bell Laboratories suggested<br />
a more practical trap based on<br />
<<br />
focused laser beams.<br />
Although the dipole-force trap is ele-<br />
gant in conception, it had practical<br />
problems. To minimize the scattering<br />
force, the light must be tuned well be-<br />
low the frequency at which the atoms<br />
readily absorb photons. At those large<br />
detunings, the trapping forces are so<br />
feeble that atoms as cold as OJOl kelvin<br />
cannot be held in the trap. Even when<br />
colder atoms were placed in the trap,<br />
they would boil out of the trap in a mat-<br />
ter of a few thousandths of a second as<br />
a result of the ever present photon scat-<br />
tering. In addition, the task of injecting<br />
atoms into the trap seemed daunting<br />
because the volume of the trap would<br />
only be 0.001 cubic millimeter.<br />
For these reasons, the challenges to<br />
optical trapping seemed formidable.<br />
Then, in 1985, a scheme for a workable<br />
optical trap became apparent after<br />
atoms were laser cooled in all dimen-<br />
sions and to much lower temperatures<br />
than the stopped atomic beams. The<br />
laser-cooling idea was first proposed in<br />
1975 by Theodor Hansch and Arthur<br />
Schawlow of Stanford University. In the<br />
same year, a similar scheme for cooling<br />
trapped ions with lasers was proposed<br />
by David J. Wineland and Hans G. Deh-<br />
melt of the University of Washington<br />
The researchers predicted that an<br />
atom could be cooled if it is irradiated<br />
from two sides by laser light at a fre-<br />
quency slightly lower than the frequen-<br />
cy needed for maximum absorption. If<br />
the atom moves in a direction oppo-<br />
*<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I