25.07.2013 Views

Download - Bechtel International Center - Stanford University

Download - Bechtel International Center - Stanford University

Download - Bechtel International Center - Stanford University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FOREIGN SCHOLAR SERVICES<br />

• Two-thousand three was highlighted by<br />

implementation of the federal government’s<br />

expansive efforts to implement the spirit of the<br />

Patriot Act, including deployment of SEVISbased<br />

forms production, mandatory registration<br />

of individuals from most Muslim countries, the<br />

fingerprinting and photographing of each visa<br />

entrant, the introduction of compulsory interviews<br />

for each visa applicant and the attendant,<br />

broadly-interpreted discretion consular officers<br />

were given to order background checks. Taken<br />

separately each of these changes would have<br />

generated enough activity to disrupt the regular<br />

flow of business. Taken together, as they were<br />

presented to us, these changes created some<br />

fundamental obstacles to the flow of scholars to<br />

<strong>Stanford</strong> in particular and to US institutions of<br />

higher learning in general.<br />

• The most obvious problem created by the new<br />

security-conscious federal environment is the<br />

significant delays engendered by background<br />

checks. These checks are carried out following a<br />

schedule of disciplines, professions and name<br />

comparisons. While applicants from some<br />

countries, such as China, are almost routinely<br />

considered for a name check (likely due to the<br />

paucity of Chinese surnames), others are<br />

mysteriously delayed for weeks on the basis of<br />

circumstances at which we can only guess.<br />

Consular interviews, now required for every visa<br />

applicant, are nothing new in countries such as<br />

India; in other countries; however, the burden of<br />

having to interview every applicant created<br />

massive delays. Various sources of assistance<br />

have been engaged, including the local member<br />

of Congress as well as helpful employees of the<br />

State Department itself. Unfortunately the<br />

Department of Homeland Security now owns<br />

the territory and defines the rules by which we<br />

now do business.<br />

• Departments, hosts and visitors are naturally<br />

unhappy at the prospect of an exchange being<br />

delayed indefinitely; some are ultimately denied<br />

a visa and are unable to come to the US at all.<br />

The literature tells us that international scholars<br />

are beginning to turn to other countries for<br />

academic exchanges. Britain, Canada, Australia<br />

as well as Continental European countries are<br />

becoming an attractive alternative as they<br />

eagerly seek out international students and<br />

scholars rather than submitting them to<br />

harassing interview and background check<br />

protocols. The Canadian Consul approached us<br />

with a request to conduct a “poaching session,”<br />

in which he described the litany of opportunities<br />

and benefits that lie north of the border.<br />

This session was very well attended, to our<br />

gratification and, at once, dismay.<br />

• We are obliged to focus our attentions and<br />

efforts inward rather than conducting outreach<br />

to the extent we would like. In this new and<br />

difficult environment, we undertook a closer<br />

relationship with <strong>Stanford</strong>’s external immigration<br />

counsel, who is associated with the <strong>University</strong><br />

through the Office of the General Counsel.<br />

Ms. Serafina Sands, a member of Pearl Law<br />

Group, has helped us interpret aspects of the<br />

law, which as non-attorneys we are not qualified<br />

to do. She also undertakes those cases that lie<br />

somewhat beyond the scope of what the<br />

<strong>University</strong> is obliged to offer as a facilitating<br />

condition of employment. In meetings with the<br />

larger “immigration task group” comprising Ms.<br />

Sands and interested members of the<br />

<strong>University</strong>’s management, the essential Guide<br />

Memorandum, 28.1, is being amended to define<br />

more carefully the obligations and benefits of<br />

<strong>Stanford</strong>’s immigration environment. We are<br />

ambivalent about this in that the “visa infrastructure”<br />

is being consolidated; at the same<br />

time we are aware that we are beginning to be<br />

regarded as an extension of the federal authority<br />

that speaks to our national interest.<br />

• Other institutions appear also to be concentrating<br />

their efforts on the new technology and<br />

procedures inherent in the Patriot Act. Our<br />

quarterly meetings of California schools now<br />

feature almost exclusively discussions of how<br />

we are dealing with the procedural and technical<br />

challenges created by some aspect of the<br />

new order.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!