Political Parties in Africa: Challenges for Sustained Multiparty
Political Parties in Africa: Challenges for Sustained Multiparty
Political Parties in Africa: Challenges for Sustained Multiparty
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• the Pan-<strong>Africa</strong>n Parliament;<br />
• the East <strong>Africa</strong>n Assembly;<br />
<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Parties</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>: <strong>Challenges</strong> <strong>for</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>Multiparty</strong> Democracy<br />
• the Southern <strong>Africa</strong>n Development Community (SADC) Parliamentary<br />
Forum; and<br />
• the Economic Community of West <strong>Africa</strong>n States Community Parliament<br />
(ECOWAS-PC).<br />
The question that <strong>in</strong>terests us is whether these state-sponsored party-to-party<br />
arrangements have the capacity to develop <strong>in</strong>to direct party-to-party partnerships.<br />
4.6.1 The Pan-<strong>Africa</strong>n Parliament (PAP)<br />
Although it was established <strong>for</strong> different reasons and <strong>in</strong> order to respond to different<br />
sets of problems, the Organization of <strong>Africa</strong>n Unity (OAU) and its successor the<br />
<strong>Africa</strong>n Union (AU) are close to the EU <strong>in</strong> their structure. However, because twothirds<br />
of <strong>Africa</strong>’s states were under military rule, military socialist or ruled by civil<br />
dictators, some observers called the OAU a club harbour<strong>in</strong>g a large number of dictators<br />
who attended its deliberations only to ga<strong>in</strong> external legitimacy—<strong>in</strong> contrast to the<br />
European Parliament, which is made up of representatives of democratic countries.<br />
(Yet even the EU needed the European Parliament to enact Europe-wide legislation<br />
and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a measure of oversight over the operations of the Union.)<br />
One of the positive consequences of the democratization process that has swept<br />
through <strong>Africa</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1990s is that it has also resulted <strong>in</strong> a positive change of the<br />
OAU’s mission—from decolonization to consolidat<strong>in</strong>g the democratic <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />
of the cont<strong>in</strong>ent. The change of name from OAU to AU is a symbolic but important<br />
step <strong>in</strong> this direction.<br />
The factors which motivated the change from OAU to AU are outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> article 5<br />
of the Sirte Declaration (9 September 1999) <strong>in</strong> which the <strong>Africa</strong>n leaders’ desire<br />
to establish an <strong>Africa</strong>n Union was spelt out as follows; ‘As we prepare to enter the<br />
21st century and cognizant of the challenges that will confront our cont<strong>in</strong>ent and<br />
peoples, we emphasize the imperative need and a high sense of urgency to rek<strong>in</strong>dle<br />
the aspirations of our peoples <strong>for</strong> stronger unity, solidarity and cohesion <strong>in</strong> a larger<br />
community of peoples transcend<strong>in</strong>g cultural, ideological, ethnic and national<br />
differences’. This is further expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> article 6, which reads as follows: ‘Article<br />
6. In order to cope with those challenges and to effectively address the new social,<br />
political and economic realities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> and <strong>in</strong> the world, we are determ<strong>in</strong>ed to<br />
fulfil our peoples’ aspirations <strong>for</strong> greater unity <strong>in</strong> con<strong>for</strong>mity with the objectives of<br />
the OAU Charter and the Treaty establish<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>Africa</strong>n Economic Community’.