25.07.2013 Views

Political Parties in Africa: Challenges for Sustained Multiparty

Political Parties in Africa: Challenges for Sustained Multiparty

Political Parties in Africa: Challenges for Sustained Multiparty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Parties</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>: <strong>Challenges</strong> <strong>for</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>Multiparty</strong> Democracy<br />

If <strong>Africa</strong>n political parties <strong>in</strong>itially emerged with<strong>in</strong> the framework of the colonial<br />

powers’ policies, which aimed to prepare the political elite to assume power when<br />

their countries were poised to ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependence, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependence some<br />

political parties were created by military rulers (Mohamed Salih 2003: 19–27) to<br />

br<strong>in</strong>g about development and national <strong>in</strong>tegration and to defend aga<strong>in</strong>st what they<br />

misconstrued as the ‘threat of division’ to national <strong>in</strong>tegration. In other <strong>in</strong>stances,<br />

civilian politicians who <strong>in</strong>herited power from the colonialists banned all exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

political parties and trans<strong>for</strong>med their states <strong>in</strong>to one-party systems <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

achieve goals similar to those professed by the military leaders—development and<br />

national <strong>in</strong>tegration. As recent history and subsequent events have shown, both goals<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed elusive.<br />

Clearly, not all political parties were <strong>in</strong>clusive. Historically, political parties established<br />

by European settlers on the eve of <strong>in</strong>dependence (<strong>in</strong> South <strong>Africa</strong>, Namibia, Zambia<br />

and Zimbabwe) were neither <strong>in</strong>clusive nor mass-based, and some of them were racist<br />

and deliberately excluded the <strong>Africa</strong>n majority.<br />

However, from a <strong>for</strong>malist viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, <strong>Africa</strong>n political parties have been successful<br />

<strong>in</strong> adopt<strong>in</strong>g and assimilat<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>for</strong>m and not the substantive content. Early on, as<br />

the struggle aga<strong>in</strong>st colonial rule progressed, <strong>Africa</strong>n political parties succeeded <strong>in</strong><br />

cultivat<strong>in</strong>g not only nationalist sentiments but also the human and f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources<br />

necessary to carry out their activities and realize their objectives. Typically, they did<br />

what We<strong>in</strong>er says def<strong>in</strong>es a successful political party: they were able to recruit and tra<strong>in</strong><br />

personnel, thereby perpetuat<strong>in</strong>g themselves as organizations; w<strong>in</strong> support (goodwill,<br />

money, votes) from the population; and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal cohesion (We<strong>in</strong>er 1967:<br />

7). This essentialist measurement of political party success is consistent with a more<br />

recent conception developed by Hague et al. (1998: 131). In their view, political<br />

parties are permanent organizations which contest elections, usually because they<br />

seek to occupy the decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g positions of authority with<strong>in</strong> the state.<br />

Almost all <strong>Africa</strong>n political parties are <strong>in</strong> pursuit of actualiz<strong>in</strong>g the four major<br />

functions of political parties <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g countries described by Randall (Randall<br />

1988: 183–7). First, they endow regimes with legitimacy by provid<strong>in</strong>g ideologies,<br />

leadership or opportunities <strong>for</strong> political participation, or a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of all three;<br />

second, they act as a medium <strong>for</strong> political recruitment, thus creat<strong>in</strong>g opportunities<br />

<strong>for</strong> upward social mobility; third, they provide opportunities <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mation of<br />

coalitions of powerful political <strong>in</strong>terests to susta<strong>in</strong> government (<strong>in</strong>terest aggregation),<br />

have major <strong>in</strong>fluence on policies as a result of devis<strong>in</strong>g programmes, supervise<br />

policy implementation, and promote the political socialization or mobilization of<br />

people to undertake self-help activities; and, fourth, they ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> political stability<br />

<strong>in</strong> societies able to absorb <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g levels of political participation by the new

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!