Political Parties in Africa: Challenges for Sustained Multiparty
Political Parties in Africa: Challenges for Sustained Multiparty
Political Parties in Africa: Challenges for Sustained Multiparty
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Political</strong> <strong>Parties</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>: <strong>Challenges</strong> <strong>for</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>Multiparty</strong> Democracy<br />
If <strong>Africa</strong>n political parties <strong>in</strong>itially emerged with<strong>in</strong> the framework of the colonial<br />
powers’ policies, which aimed to prepare the political elite to assume power when<br />
their countries were poised to ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependence, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependence some<br />
political parties were created by military rulers (Mohamed Salih 2003: 19–27) to<br />
br<strong>in</strong>g about development and national <strong>in</strong>tegration and to defend aga<strong>in</strong>st what they<br />
misconstrued as the ‘threat of division’ to national <strong>in</strong>tegration. In other <strong>in</strong>stances,<br />
civilian politicians who <strong>in</strong>herited power from the colonialists banned all exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
political parties and trans<strong>for</strong>med their states <strong>in</strong>to one-party systems <strong>in</strong> order to<br />
achieve goals similar to those professed by the military leaders—development and<br />
national <strong>in</strong>tegration. As recent history and subsequent events have shown, both goals<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>ed elusive.<br />
Clearly, not all political parties were <strong>in</strong>clusive. Historically, political parties established<br />
by European settlers on the eve of <strong>in</strong>dependence (<strong>in</strong> South <strong>Africa</strong>, Namibia, Zambia<br />
and Zimbabwe) were neither <strong>in</strong>clusive nor mass-based, and some of them were racist<br />
and deliberately excluded the <strong>Africa</strong>n majority.<br />
However, from a <strong>for</strong>malist viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, <strong>Africa</strong>n political parties have been successful<br />
<strong>in</strong> adopt<strong>in</strong>g and assimilat<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>for</strong>m and not the substantive content. Early on, as<br />
the struggle aga<strong>in</strong>st colonial rule progressed, <strong>Africa</strong>n political parties succeeded <strong>in</strong><br />
cultivat<strong>in</strong>g not only nationalist sentiments but also the human and f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources<br />
necessary to carry out their activities and realize their objectives. Typically, they did<br />
what We<strong>in</strong>er says def<strong>in</strong>es a successful political party: they were able to recruit and tra<strong>in</strong><br />
personnel, thereby perpetuat<strong>in</strong>g themselves as organizations; w<strong>in</strong> support (goodwill,<br />
money, votes) from the population; and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal cohesion (We<strong>in</strong>er 1967:<br />
7). This essentialist measurement of political party success is consistent with a more<br />
recent conception developed by Hague et al. (1998: 131). In their view, political<br />
parties are permanent organizations which contest elections, usually because they<br />
seek to occupy the decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g positions of authority with<strong>in</strong> the state.<br />
Almost all <strong>Africa</strong>n political parties are <strong>in</strong> pursuit of actualiz<strong>in</strong>g the four major<br />
functions of political parties <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g countries described by Randall (Randall<br />
1988: 183–7). First, they endow regimes with legitimacy by provid<strong>in</strong>g ideologies,<br />
leadership or opportunities <strong>for</strong> political participation, or a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of all three;<br />
second, they act as a medium <strong>for</strong> political recruitment, thus creat<strong>in</strong>g opportunities<br />
<strong>for</strong> upward social mobility; third, they provide opportunities <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mation of<br />
coalitions of powerful political <strong>in</strong>terests to susta<strong>in</strong> government (<strong>in</strong>terest aggregation),<br />
have major <strong>in</strong>fluence on policies as a result of devis<strong>in</strong>g programmes, supervise<br />
policy implementation, and promote the political socialization or mobilization of<br />
people to undertake self-help activities; and, fourth, they ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> political stability<br />
<strong>in</strong> societies able to absorb <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g levels of political participation by the new