25.07.2013 Views

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

educes his bigoted evolutionist professor to stammering idiocy by confronting him with<br />

creation-science arguments, is one of the most widely-distributed pieces of creationist<br />

literature ever. Chick’s creationist comic books The Ark (1976) and Primal Man? (1976)<br />

are found in many Christian bookstores, though Chick is often criticized <strong>for</strong> his savagely<br />

anti-Catholic literature.<br />

Of the televangelists who have campaigned against evolution, Jimmy Swaggart<br />

has had the biggest audience. Jerry Falwell hosted Henry Morris on his Old-Time Gospel<br />

Hour several times in 1981 when he was campaigning <strong>for</strong> the teaching of creationism in<br />

public schools, hosted and moderated the televised debate between Gish and Russell<br />

Doolittle of UC San Diego the same year, and distributed one of Morris’s books free. Pat<br />

Robertson has had many creation-science guests on his 700 Club.<br />

D. James Kennedy of Coral Ridge Ministries in Florida, whose degrees include a<br />

Ph.D. from NYU, is now one of the most effective advocates of creationism. He has<br />

devoted several of his national telecasts to attacking evolution, which he claims “flies in<br />

the face of established scientific laws.” Evolution is itself “more religious than creation”:<br />

it is actually a deliberate attempt to suppress Christian belief. Evolution, Kennedy<br />

preaches, is the “pseudo scientific foundation” of “every single anti-Christian” system—<br />

especially of Nazism, communism, and secular humanism. Yet, “The whole of evolution<br />

is in absolute chaos today and the public does not know it. Students are still being taught<br />

the same old lies” (1983:2).<br />

Kennedy, whose anti-evolution sermons are filled with inaccuracies and<br />

distortions 22 , claims that “one of the disheartening things about the advent of Darwinism<br />

is that it introduced into science an element of dishonesty which had not been seen<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e” (1986:1). Kennedy delivered the keynote address at the 1986 International<br />

Creation Conference in Pittsburgh, “Origins: Creation or Evolution.” This lecture was<br />

later telecast on his show. All his telecasts are also distributed free as audiocassettes and<br />

pamphlets (“New Evidences <strong>for</strong> Creation,” 1977; “The Collapse of Evolution,” 1981;<br />

“The Crumbling of Evolution,” 1983; “Evolution’s Bloopers and Blunders,” 1986 [also<br />

reprinted in Bible-<strong>Science</strong> Newsletter 1987:25(3)]; “<strong>Creationism</strong>: <strong>Science</strong> or Religion?”<br />

1987). More recently, he has made a creation-science movie, The Case <strong>for</strong> Creation<br />

(1988; see McIver 1988i).<br />

Kennedy was recently (1987) featured in a six-part series promoting creationism<br />

on the John Ankerberg show (Thomas Wheeler has written a detailed refutation of<br />

22 I have mentioned several in different articles. Two examples: Kennedy states that Darrow bullied Bryan<br />

with alleged evidence <strong>for</strong> “Nebraska Man” at the Scopes Trial, when in fact “Nebraska Man” was not even<br />

mentioned at the trial H.F. Osborn, who had indeed taunted Bryan with this proposed hominid from<br />

Bryan’s home state, had by the time of the trial realized that the evidence, a single tooth, had likely been<br />

misinterpreted). Kennedy simply repeats a story told by Rimmer in 1935 which has become entrenched in<br />

creationist folklore (Kennedy 1986:6; Rimmer 1951:118-122).<br />

Another entrenched piece of folklore that Kennedy is also perpetuating is the extremely widely-repeated<br />

claim that Darrow, at the Scopes Trial, said that it was “bigotry <strong>for</strong> public schools to teach only one theory<br />

of origins” (e.g. Kennedy 1987:10, and in many other places). This apocryphal quote was popularized and<br />

legitimized by Bird in his Yale Law Review article (Bird 1978:561), but it originated with a creationist in<br />

Ventura, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, who claims to have heard it from a deceased preacher, and mentioned it casually in a<br />

journal article published by CRSC. The complete trial record (<strong>National</strong> Book 1925) contains no such<br />

quote. I wrote entire article about the quote (McIver 1988f), which, though spurious, has become enshrined<br />

as a potent argument <strong>for</strong> the “two-model” approach. Kennedy and many other creationists (notably<br />

Maranatha’s SCS) continue to rely on it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!