Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education Creationism - National Center for Science Education

25.07.2013 Views

Russell Artist, another Church of Christ member, has a Ph.D. in biology and headed the biology department at David Lipscomb College in Tennessee. He wrote a chapter in J. Monsma’s 1966 Behind the Dim Unknown. Bert Thompson dedicated his strongly creationist History of Evolutionary Thought (1981) to Artist. R. Clyde McCone has a Ph.D. in anthropology and sociology from Michigan State University and has long been a professor of cultural anthropology at California State University at Long Beach. He wrote several chapters in the Symposium on Creation volumes on the topics “The Origins of Civilization” and “Evolutionary Time: A Moral Issue” (Morris et al. 1968; Patten, ed., 1972). A later book, Culture and Controversy (1978) concerns “speaking in tongues”: McCone disputes the modern Pentecostal assumption that Christ’s disciples spoke in unknown languages at Pentecost,’ arguing instead that they spoke in vernacular languages (Aramaic, Greek and Latin) rather than in the sacred Hebrew (Christ had freed them from the Jewish traditions in order to bear witness to Christ). Larry Butler has a Ph.D in biochemistry from UCLA, where he also did postdoctoral work. While at UCLA he also taught at Los Angeles Baptist College. He is now a professor of biochemistry at Purdue, where he went in 1966. Most of Biology: A Search for Order in Complexity is standard high school biology material, but it is interspersed with strongly anti-evolutionist chapters and sections. It scoffs at evolutionary explanations as inadequate, and presents creationscience as an equally scientific and in fact superior alternative. A major unit on “Theories of Biological Change” emphasizes the standard creation-science arguments: evidence for a young earth, the “hypothetical” nature of the geological column, the many “wrong-order” fossils (including the Paluxy “manprints” and the Meister trilobite-andhuman fossil), the sudden appearance and persistence of life-forms, genetic variation within “kinds” as opposed to unlimited evolution, sections presenting “Failures of Darwinian Theory” and the many “Problems for Evolutionists.” The textbook suggests that Flood Geology is “superior because it conforms to the principles of hydrodynamics,” and says that evolutionists reject young-earth dating methods because they require long ages for the “doctrine of evolution, which has no observable evidential basis.” It criticizes fossil hominids as products of wishful thinking, and teaches that “mechanistic” theories of evolutionists cannot explain our consciences or allow for moral behavior. [T]he creation model is a framework of interpretation and correlation which is at least as satisfactory as the evolution model. However, the two laws of thermodynamics, the apparent stability of the basic ‘kinds,’ the existence of great gaps between the kinds, the deteriorative nature of mutations, and the catastrophic nature of the worldwide fossil-bearing formations all may be correlated far more easily with the creation model than with the evolution model. [1974:xxii] The CRS textbook was approved by many state textbook committees, but was declared unconstitutional by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1977 in Hendren v. Campbell. The CRS Board planned a new edition which would be less overtly religious in order to circumvent this ruling (the 1971 and 1974 editions openly endorse the Book of Genesis and Noah’s Flood), but this proposed revision ran into trouble. Zondervan declined to publish a new edition, so Creation-Life Publishers, the ICR affiliate, offered to take it, and also offered Morris’s ICR staff to do the revising. But some CRS members felt that ICR should not take the project away from CRS, and Rusch tried to get a Lutheran committee to revise it for publication by Mott Media (Morris 1984b:199-200).

THE BIBLE-SCIENCE ASSOCIATION The Bible-Science Association, another major creationist organization, began at about the same time as the Creation Research Society. The BSA was founded by Rev. Walter Lang, a Missouri Synod Lutheran, who until recently has been its director and dominant figure. Lang graduated from Concordia Seminary in St. Louis, and was pastoring a church in Caldwell, Idaho in 1963 when he decided to publish a regular Bible-science newsletter. Lang had then been a minister for 26 years and had, as he admits, “devoted no time to the sciences,” but felt a need for a creation-science newsletter because none existed at that time (Lang and Lang 1984:1). Lang concurs that Whitcomb and Morris’s 1961 Genesis Flood “really sparked the modern creationist movement” (Lang and Lang 1984:6). When the CRS was formed in 1963, Lammerts notified Rev. Herman Otten, another Concordia graduate who played a key role in opposing liberalism and evolution in the Missouri Synod. Otten in turn contacted Lang, who responded by mimeographing the first issue of the Bible-Science Newsletter in his church. (This preceded publication of the first CRSQ, though by less than a year, and the EPM did not publish on a regular basis; thus BSN is the oldest continuing creation-science periodical.) Otten strenuously opposed modernism and promoted fundamentalism in his book Baal or God (undated [1965]). At this time (the 1960s) there was a fierce struggle in the Missouri Synod between fundamentalists and “liberals.” The fundamentalists won, largely due to Otten’s efforts. In the chapter “Creation” in Otten’s book, he insisted on the literal truth of Genesis and special creation, and described the capitulations to evolution by most denominations. “Christianity rejects the theory of evolution because it is diametrically opposed to the biblical account of creation.” He also praised the CRS for affirming strict creationism, and presented many of the standard anti-evolution quotes. Otten has continued to stress creationism in his Christian News (formerly Lutheran News), and, as previously mentioned, has recently come out strongly in favor of the “historical revisionist” claim that there was no Nazi Holocaust. In response to the Newsletter, the Bible-Science Association was organized in 1964. Active in its formation were two housewives in Orange County, California, Jean Sumrall and Nell Segraves, who later founded, with Morris and others, the Creation- Science Research Center in San Diego. Californian Paul Hackstedde became the first BSA president. As many of the original BSA members were Southern Californians, the BSA held its first Creation Seminar (Bible-Science Institute) in Los Angeles. The main speakers at this Seminar were CRS officers: Lammerts and Rusch; also Burdick, Howe, and Davidheiser. Their presentations, plus one by Lang, were published by the BSA as The Challenge of Creation (Lang, ed., 1965). Because CRS scientists predominated as speakers, BSA members felt that BSA and CRS ought to merge. The CRS resisted this suggestion; they wanted to remain a scientific organization and not be controlled by laymen; the BSA, for their part, wanted to spread the message of creationism to nonscientists and in churches (Lang and Lang 1984:5; Morris 1984:215-6, Lammerts 1974:62). So CRS has remained unaffiliated with other organizations (though membership overlaps), and the BSA has concentrated on a different type of ministry.

Russell Artist, another Church of Christ member, has a Ph.D. in biology and<br />

headed the biology department at David Lipscomb College in Tennessee. He wrote a<br />

chapter in J. Monsma’s 1966 Behind the Dim Unknown. Bert Thompson dedicated his<br />

strongly creationist History of Evolutionary Thought (1981) to Artist.<br />

R. Clyde McCone has a Ph.D. in anthropology and sociology from Michigan<br />

State University and has long been a professor of cultural anthropology at Cali<strong>for</strong>nia<br />

State University at Long Beach. He wrote several chapters in the Symposium on<br />

Creation volumes on the topics “The Origins of Civilization” and “Evolutionary Time: A<br />

Moral Issue” (Morris et al. 1968; Patten, ed., 1972). A later book, Culture and<br />

Controversy (1978) concerns “speaking in tongues”: McCone disputes the modern<br />

Pentecostal assumption that Christ’s disciples spoke in unknown languages at Pentecost,’<br />

arguing instead that they spoke in vernacular languages (Aramaic, Greek and Latin)<br />

rather than in the sacred Hebrew (Christ had freed them from the Jewish traditions in<br />

order to bear witness to Christ).<br />

Larry Butler has a Ph.D in biochemistry from UCLA, where he also did postdoctoral<br />

work. While at UCLA he also taught at Los Angeles Baptist College. He is<br />

now a professor of biochemistry at Purdue, where he went in 1966.<br />

Most of Biology: A Search <strong>for</strong> Order in Complexity is standard high school<br />

biology material, but it is interspersed with strongly anti-evolutionist chapters and<br />

sections. It scoffs at evolutionary explanations as inadequate, and presents creationscience<br />

as an equally scientific and in fact superior alternative. A major unit on<br />

“Theories of Biological Change” emphasizes the standard creation-science arguments:<br />

evidence <strong>for</strong> a young earth, the “hypothetical” nature of the geological column, the many<br />

“wrong-order” fossils (including the Paluxy “manprints” and the Meister trilobite-andhuman<br />

fossil), the sudden appearance and persistence of life-<strong>for</strong>ms, genetic variation<br />

within “kinds” as opposed to unlimited evolution, sections presenting “Failures of<br />

Darwinian Theory” and the many “Problems <strong>for</strong> Evolutionists.” The textbook suggests<br />

that Flood Geology is “superior because it con<strong>for</strong>ms to the principles of hydrodynamics,”<br />

and says that evolutionists reject young-earth dating methods because they require long<br />

ages <strong>for</strong> the “doctrine of evolution, which has no observable evidential basis.” It<br />

criticizes fossil hominids as products of wishful thinking, and teaches that “mechanistic”<br />

theories of evolutionists cannot explain our consciences or allow <strong>for</strong> moral behavior.<br />

[T]he creation model is a framework of interpretation and correlation which is at least as satisfactory as the<br />

evolution model. However, the two laws of thermodynamics, the apparent stability of the basic ‘kinds,’ the<br />

existence of great gaps between the kinds, the deteriorative nature of mutations, and the catastrophic nature<br />

of the worldwide fossil-bearing <strong>for</strong>mations all may be correlated far more easily with the creation model<br />

than with the evolution model. [1974:xxii]<br />

The CRS textbook was approved by many state textbook committees, but was<br />

declared unconstitutional by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1977 in Hendren v. Campbell.<br />

The CRS Board planned a new edition which would be less overtly religious in order to<br />

circumvent this ruling (the 1971 and 1974 editions openly endorse the Book of Genesis<br />

and Noah’s Flood), but this proposed revision ran into trouble. Zondervan declined to<br />

publish a new edition, so Creation-Life Publishers, the ICR affiliate, offered to take it,<br />

and also offered Morris’s ICR staff to do the revising. But some CRS members felt that<br />

ICR should not take the project away from CRS, and Rusch tried to get a Lutheran<br />

committee to revise it <strong>for</strong> publication by Mott Media (Morris 1984b:199-200).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!