Creationism - National Center for Science Education
Creationism - National Center for Science Education Creationism - National Center for Science Education
CHAPTER 3 THE MODERN CREATION-SCIENCE MOVEMENT HENRY MORRIS; THE AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC AFFILIATION After the fireworks and public campaigns of the 1920s, fundamentalism, and with it anti-evolutionism, largely retreated from the public eye. It was, however, still there, “underground and actively germinating” (Morris 1984b:7). Except for their initial success with Prohibition, the major fundamentalist attempts to transform and regenerate society by direct legislation and public action failed. Fundamentalists withdrew from open confrontation with “the world” into their own enclaves and institutions. The antievolution legacy lingered on, however, as science textbooks shied away from forthright discussion (or even mention) of evolution. A study by Grabiner and Miller, “Effects of the Scopes Trial,” published in Science (1974) concluded that evolution was downgraded in textbooks following the trial, and did not regain its former emphasis until the 1960s. An early turning point in the re-emergence of creationism into the larger arena, and the starting point of the modern creation-science movement, was the publication, in 1961, of Whitcomb and Morris’s book The Genesis Flood: The Biblical Record and Its Scientific Implications. Henry M. Morris is very widely acknowledged as the founding father and leading theoretician of modern creation-science. Morris, born in 1918, was a theistic evolutionist in college at Rice Institute (now University) in Texas. A Southern Baptist, he was born again, and became an active proselytizer in the Gideons after college. In 1943 he became convinced of the truth of creationism largely by reading Rimmer and Price, after returning to Rice to teach civil engineering. Shortly before this, Morris was strongly influenced by hearing Irwin Moon’s “Sermons from Science” lecture demonstration. In 1944, Morris wrote a booklet God’s Way of Salvation. That You Might Believe, Morris’s first book, was first published in 1946, when he was 28, just before he returned to graduate school. Most of the book concerns biblical and scientific creationism, and evidences for Flood Geology, as well as chapters espousing other examples of Bible-science. But Morris was not yet totally committed to strict young-earth creationism. The original edition allowed for Gap Theory creationism. But even as the book was in press, Morris became convinced that the Bible clearly taught recent creation and a world-destroying Flood, and that science could be so interpreted. Morris credits a paper by Clifford Burdick, a Seventh-day Adventist who studied under Price, in particular with convincing him. Burdick’s paper was a critique of the radiometric dating methods which seemed to doom young-earth interpretations. Morris expunged this mention of the possibility of an old earth from later editions of his book. In ICR lectures, Morris remarks that this original edition is now—fortunately— unavailable. A revised and expanded version of That You Might Believe was published in 1951 with the title The Bible and Modern Science. This version was written while Morris was working on his doctoral dissertation at the University of Minnesota (A New Concept of Flow in Rough Conduits, 1950). Morris says his “main motivation” in returning to
graduate school to study hydraulic engineering was to prove the validity of Flood Geology (Morris and Parker 1982; Morris 1984b:147). However, shortly after he made this decision, the first atomic bombs exploded. To Morris, it appeared that the prophesied end of the world was at hand, and it seemed pointless to continue in school when the Lord was about to return. At this moment, Morris met Arthur I. Brown, who, though also a fervent premillennialist, convinced Morris to stay in school because his scientific training would prove to be extremely valuable if the Lord chose to tarry (Morris 1984b:102). Morris says that before he returned to graduate school he had met W.B. Riley, founder of the World’s Christian Fundamentals Association. Riley had also founded Northwestern Bible College, and was looking for a new president. Impressed with Morris’s That You Might Believe, he wanted him for the job, but Morris had decided to return to graduate school. Billy Graham was later appointed president of Northwestern (Morris 1984b:58n). Morris also published another version of his book for Moody Bible Institute’s popular Colportage Library series. The last edition under the original title was published in 1978. In one form or another, this book has been in print continuously for over forty years. In 1986, Morris published a revised edition of The Bible and Modern Science titled Science and the Bible. In all its various editions and reincarnations, this book has been Morris’s all-time best seller. The Preface to The Bible and Modern Science opens with these words: The purpose of this book, very frankly and without apology, is to win people to a genuine faith in Jesus Christ as the eternal Son of God and their personal Saviour, and to assist in strengthening the faith of those who have already received Him in this light. It is especially addressed to young people who are finding biblical Christianity under attack in many quarters in these days, nowhere more so than in the classes and textbooks of most of our colleges and universities, and even in the public schools. Morris says (1984:100) that these words “could still apply to every book I have written since, even those which are strictly sicentific in content.” Irwin Moon, whose “Sermons from Science” so impressed Morris, founded the American Scientific Affiliation in 1941 together with the president of Moody Bible Institute. Moody Bible Institute, in Chicago, was founded in 1886 by Dwight L. Moody, the famous evangelist. Though America had been periodically swept by great Revivals and religious Awakenings in the past, Moody was the first—and one of the greatest—of the new, urbanized revivalist preachers. Moody Bible Institute has remained strongly fundamentalist and creationist. The American Scientific Affiliation (ASA) is an organization of Christian evangelical scientists: “A group of Christian scientific men devoting themselves to the task of reviewing, preparing, and distributing information on the authenticity, historicity, and scientific aspects of the Holy Scriptures in order that the faith of many in the Lord Jesus Christ may be firmly established” (Amer. Sci. Affil. 1948:3). ASA members have held varying positions regarding evolution, from strict creationism to theistic evolution. When it was founded, there was a dearth of active creationist organizations, and many creationists became members, expecting the ASA to remain a creationist bastion. Among the original ASA organizers were John Van Haitsma and Peter Stoner. Van Haitsma, professor of organic science at Calvin College (Christian Reformed) in Grand Rapids, Michigan, is the author of The Supplanter Undeceived (1941), a Bible-science book. Peter Stoner, a math professor at Pasadena City College (California), is the author of Science Speaks: Scientific Proof of the Accuracy of the Bible (1958; an earlier version
- Page 13 and 14: Scottish professors. Rejecting the
- Page 15 and 16: Bacon’s scientific method “to r
- Page 17 and 18: Randall Hedtke, in his 1983 book Th
- Page 19 and 20: Price wrote that he always tried
- Page 21 and 22: Morris, like most creation-scientis
- Page 23 and 24: Was there any way by which all desi
- Page 25 and 26: example), but these changes are all
- Page 27 and 28: stating the fact that at this parti
- Page 29 and 30: all coming to pass, calculated by m
- Page 31 and 32: course insist on a literal interpre
- Page 33 and 34: adhering to true biblical principle
- Page 35 and 36: similar to Orr’s. He tried to all
- Page 37 and 38: In the final chapter of God—or Go
- Page 39 and 40: the students. That is probably the
- Page 41 and 42: Therefore it becomes painfully nece
- Page 43 and 44: CHAPTER 2 ORIGINS OF MODERN “SCIE
- Page 45 and 46: Creation by demonstrating the falsi
- Page 47 and 48: nurture their young, and sent them
- Page 49 and 50: explanation of these wonders.” Th
- Page 51 and 52: We feel the public are being deceiv
- Page 53 and 54: Genesis should be kept out of publi
- Page 55 and 56: “ontogeny repeats phylogeny”—
- Page 57 and 58: scientist is the authority of the f
- Page 59 and 60: A study of the Flood would therefor
- Page 61 and 62: Evolution is purely speculation. It
- Page 63: Fleming’s Modern Anthropology ver
- Page 67 and 68: eligious and biblical “moral” (
- Page 69 and 70: produces various different types of
- Page 71 and 72: instance, features Lammerts; it con
- Page 73 and 74: early ASA members were strict creat
- Page 75 and 76: egan in 1965. Biology: A Search for
- Page 77 and 78: THE BIBLE-SCIENCE ASSOCIATION The B
- Page 79 and 80: space technology, and a member of t
- Page 81 and 82: California Public Schools (Segraves
- Page 83 and 84: Henry Morris had a successful caree
- Page 85 and 86: the protestors objected to, but the
- Page 87 and 88: and creationist thought. Interestin
- Page 89 and 90: Lubenow and said, “You’re a Chr
- Page 91 and 92: Among the attendees at the Summer I
- Page 93 and 94: educes his bigoted evolutionist pro
- Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 4 THEORETICAL ISSUES: SCIEN
- Page 97 and 98: eality, nor is it intended to be. (
- Page 99 and 100: Assuming that present-day scientifi
- Page 101 and 102: devotes much of his book to the mor
- Page 103 and 104: Hitchcock. Their completely unfound
- Page 105 and 106: in the series did. Rev. Henry Beach
- Page 107 and 108: Materialism and Evolution (1932) is
- Page 109 and 110: (1984), he says: “The Bible is in
- Page 111 and 112: Faith, he says, is not dependent on
- Page 113 and 114: “Each creation command in Genesis
CHAPTER 3<br />
THE MODERN CREATION-SCIENCE MOVEMENT<br />
HENRY MORRIS; THE AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC AFFILIATION<br />
After the fireworks and public campaigns of the 1920s, fundamentalism, and with<br />
it anti-evolutionism, largely retreated from the public eye. It was, however, still there,<br />
“underground and actively germinating” (Morris 1984b:7). Except <strong>for</strong> their initial<br />
success with Prohibition, the major fundamentalist attempts to trans<strong>for</strong>m and regenerate<br />
society by direct legislation and public action failed. Fundamentalists withdrew from<br />
open confrontation with “the world” into their own enclaves and institutions. The antievolution<br />
legacy lingered on, however, as science textbooks shied away from <strong>for</strong>thright<br />
discussion (or even mention) of evolution. A study by Grabiner and Miller, “Effects of<br />
the Scopes Trial,” published in <strong>Science</strong> (1974) concluded that evolution was downgraded<br />
in textbooks following the trial, and did not regain its <strong>for</strong>mer emphasis until the 1960s.<br />
An early turning point in the re-emergence of creationism into the larger arena,<br />
and the starting point of the modern creation-science movement, was the publication, in<br />
1961, of Whitcomb and Morris’s book The Genesis Flood: The Biblical Record and Its<br />
Scientific Implications. Henry M. Morris is very widely acknowledged as the founding<br />
father and leading theoretician of modern creation-science.<br />
Morris, born in 1918, was a theistic evolutionist in college at Rice Institute (now<br />
University) in Texas. A Southern Baptist, he was born again, and became an active<br />
proselytizer in the Gideons after college. In 1943 he became convinced of the truth of<br />
creationism largely by reading Rimmer and Price, after returning to Rice to teach civil<br />
engineering. Shortly be<strong>for</strong>e this, Morris was strongly influenced by hearing Irwin<br />
Moon’s “Sermons from <strong>Science</strong>” lecture demonstration. In 1944, Morris wrote a booklet<br />
God’s Way of Salvation.<br />
That You Might Believe, Morris’s first book, was first published in 1946, when he<br />
was 28, just be<strong>for</strong>e he returned to graduate school. Most of the book concerns biblical<br />
and scientific creationism, and evidences <strong>for</strong> Flood Geology, as well as chapters<br />
espousing other examples of Bible-science. But Morris was not yet totally committed to<br />
strict young-earth creationism. The original edition allowed <strong>for</strong> Gap Theory creationism.<br />
But even as the book was in press, Morris became convinced that the Bible<br />
clearly taught recent creation and a world-destroying Flood, and that science could be so<br />
interpreted. Morris credits a paper by Clif<strong>for</strong>d Burdick, a Seventh-day Adventist who<br />
studied under Price, in particular with convincing him. Burdick’s paper was a critique of<br />
the radiometric dating methods which seemed to doom young-earth interpretations.<br />
Morris expunged this mention of the possibility of an old earth from later editions of his<br />
book. In ICR lectures, Morris remarks that this original edition is now—<strong>for</strong>tunately—<br />
unavailable.<br />
A revised and expanded version of That You Might Believe was published in 1951<br />
with the title The Bible and Modern <strong>Science</strong>. This version was written while Morris was<br />
working on his doctoral dissertation at the University of Minnesota (A New Concept of<br />
Flow in Rough Conduits, 1950). Morris says his “main motivation” in returning to