25.07.2013 Views

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

measurements in order to provide scientifically accurate dimensions <strong>for</strong> this literal city.<br />

He then calculates the average cubic living space <strong>for</strong> each inhabitant (the physically<br />

resurrected bodies of the saved) by estimating total world population since Creation, plus<br />

people born during the Millennium, divided by five (from his estimation that 20% of all<br />

living souls will have been saved), arriving at a total population of 20 billion <strong>for</strong> the New<br />

Jerusalem. This works out to about one-thirtieth of a cubic mile per resurrected body—<br />

quite spacious, actually (1983:450-451).<br />

In 1902 Jabez Dimbleby, a founder of several British chronological and<br />

astronomical associations, wrote a book called The Date of Creation: Its Immovable and<br />

Scientific Character, in which he used eclipse cycles, planetary orbits, lunar and solar<br />

cycles, other astronomical data, and Hebrew and Chaldean calendars. He calculated that<br />

all these various cycles began together at 3996 B.C., which is thus the date of Creation.<br />

(He seems to have supposed that the geological ages, though, preceded this Creation.)<br />

Dimbleby reasons that scientific and calendrical data (including biblical data) can be<br />

analyzed to yield the exact date of Creation, which is a “factual” event attested to in<br />

Genesis.<br />

This tradition is carried on by Eugene Faulstich, an electrical engineer and <strong>for</strong>mer<br />

president of the Bible-<strong>Science</strong> Association. Faulstich founded the Chronology-History<br />

Research Institute in Iowa, which is intended as a graduate level school devoted to Bible<br />

apologetics, specializing in study of Bible chronology and dating. Using computer<br />

analysis, Faulstich shows that Bible chronology, without assuming any gaps in the<br />

Genesis genealogies, is completely accurate. Creation can be conclusively dated to<br />

Sunday, March 17th, 4001 B.C. The thesis of one of his reports is that “Old Testament<br />

Hebrew Scripture can scientifically be proven to be historically accurate since Creation,<br />

and that Jesus was predestined in that history as the Messiah and Saviour of the world”<br />

(n.d.). Number patterns discovered by Faulstich’s analyses prove the supernatural origin<br />

and plan of history chronicled and <strong>for</strong>etold in the Bible, and confirms the recent creation<br />

of the universe (Absolute Chronology of the Universe, n.d.; Moses the Astronomer and<br />

Historian par Excellence, 1983; History, Harmony and the Hebrew Kings, 1986; and his<br />

periodical It’s About Time). Time-spans between significant biblical events occur as<br />

unusual and patterned sums of days, with a numerologically significant preponderance of<br />

7s and 3s. From study of the Hebrew lunar and solar calendar systems, Faulstich found<br />

that all the calendrical cycles (weekly cycles, months, Priestly cycles, Sabbath and<br />

Jubilee years) were aligned only once every 2395 years. One of these alignments was<br />

4001 B.C.: the date of Creation. Faulstich also discovered an equally significant<br />

astronomical alignment of the earth, moon, Venus, Mars and Mercury which also<br />

occurred at 4001 B.C., <strong>for</strong> which he claims confirmation from the Harvard <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

Astrophysics (and specifically Owen Gingerich). 5<br />

In <strong>Science</strong> Speaks: Scientific Proof of the Accuracy of Prophecy and the Bible<br />

(1958), Peter Stoner demonstrates how modern scientific discoveries are just now<br />

catching up with—and confirming—the Bible. Much of the book is a presentation of the<br />

probability argument—now a favorite with fundamentalists—concerning a list of Bible<br />

prophecies. Stoner assigns a probability of each prophecy coming true; the probability of<br />

5 For a critical evaluation of Faulstich’s chronological computations and analysis and the significance ot eh<br />

astronomical conjunctions, see W. Jefferys 1987.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!