Creationism - National Center for Science Education

More documents

Recommendations

Info

.......1964 Creation Revealed: A Study of Genesis Chapter One in the Light of Modern Science. Westwood NJ: Fleming H. Revell. .......1970 The Flood Reconsidered. London: Pickering & Inglis. Films for Christ .......1979 The Great Dinosaur Mystery (film). Fleming, Sir John Ambrose .......1933 Evolution or Creation? London: Marshall, Morgan and Scott. .......1935 Modern Anthropology versus Biblical Statements on Human Origin. Westminster, U.K.: Victoria Inst. Fothergill, Philip G. 1953 Historical Aspects of Organic Evolution. New York: Philosophical Library. .......1961 Evolution and Christians. London: Longmans, Green. Fox, Norman .......1981 Fossils: Hard Facts from the Earth. San Diego: Creation-Life. Frame, Randy .......1984 “A Team of Cult Watchers Challenges a Growing Campus Ministry.” Christianity Today: Aug. 10. Freeman, Alan, and Betty Mensch .......1987 “Religion as Science / Science as Religion: Constitutional Law and the Fundamentalist Challenge.” Tikkun: 2(5):64-71. French, Joel, and Jane French .......1979 War Beyond the Stars: Angelic Encounters. Harrison AR: New Leaf Press. Friedman, Richard Elliott .......1987 Who Wrote the Bible? New York: Summit Books. Frye, Roland Mushat .......1983 Is God a Creationist?: The Religious Case Against Creation-Science. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Gabel, Peter .......1987 “Creationism and the Spirit of Nature.” Tikkun: 2(5):55-63. Gaebelein, Arno .......1933 The Conflict of the Ages. Neptune NJ: Loizeaux Bros.
Gange, Robert A. .......1986 Origins & Destiny. Waco, Texas: Word Books. Gardner, Martin .......1957 [1952] Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science. New York: Dover. .......1980 “Mathematical Games.” Sci. Amer.: 243(3):20-24. .......1983 “The Bible and God’s Numerology.” In Order and Surprise (Buffalo NY: Prometheus Books). Gatewood, Willard .......1969 Controversy in the Twenties: Fundamentalism Modernism, and Evolution. Nashville: Vanderbilt Univ. Press. Geisler, Norman .......1982 The Creator in the Courtroom: “Scopes II”. Milford MI: Mott Media. Geisler, Norman, and J. Kerby Anderson .......1987 Origin Science: A Proposal for the Creation-Evolution Controversy. Grand Rapids MI: Baker Book House. Gentry, Robert V. .......1986 Creation’s Tiny Mystery. Knoxville TN: Earth Science Associates. Gilbert, Dan .......1935 Evolution: The Root of All Isms. San Diego: The Danielle Publishers. .......1944 [1933] Crucifying Christ in Our Colleges. Wash., D.C.: The Danielle Publishers. Gillespie, Neal C. .......1979 Charles Darwin and the Problem of Creation. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press. Gillispie, Charles Coulston .......1951 Genesis and Geology. Cambridge MA: Harvard Univ. Press. Gish, Duane T. .......1972 Speculations and Experiments Related to Theories on the Origin of Life. San Diego: Institute for Creation Research. ICR Technical Monograph No. 1. .......1979 Evolution? The Fossils Say No! San Diego: Creation-Life. Gish, Duane T., and Arthur C. Cunningham, eds. .......1986 The Christian World View of Science and Technology. Mountain View CA: Coalition on Revival. A COR “Sphere Document.”
Page 1 and 2:
Creationism Intellectual Origins, C
Page 3 and 4:
INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. F
Page 5 and 6:
Creationism: Intellectual Origins,
Page 7 and 8:
sharp divisions within the creation
Page 9 and 10:
PRE-MILLENNIALISM CHAPTER 1 FUNDAME
Page 11 and 12:
Jackson is a Church of Christ minis
Page 13 and 14:
Scottish professors. Rejecting the
Page 15 and 16:
Bacon’s scientific method “to r
Page 17 and 18:
Randall Hedtke, in his 1983 book Th
Page 19 and 20:
Price wrote that he always tried
Page 21 and 22:
Morris, like most creation-scientis
Page 23 and 24:
Was there any way by which all desi
Page 25 and 26:
example), but these changes are all
Page 27 and 28:
stating the fact that at this parti
Page 29 and 30:
all coming to pass, calculated by m
Page 31 and 32:
course insist on a literal interpre
Page 33 and 34:
adhering to true biblical principle
Page 35 and 36:
similar to Orr’s. He tried to all
Page 37 and 38:
In the final chapter of God—or Go
Page 39 and 40:
the students. That is probably the
Page 41 and 42:
Therefore it becomes painfully nece
Page 43 and 44:
CHAPTER 2 ORIGINS OF MODERN “SCIE
Page 45 and 46:
Creation by demonstrating the falsi
Page 47 and 48:
nurture their young, and sent them
Page 49 and 50:
explanation of these wonders.” Th
Page 51 and 52:
We feel the public are being deceiv
Page 53 and 54:
Genesis should be kept out of publi
Page 55 and 56:
“ontogeny repeats phylogeny”—
Page 57 and 58:
scientist is the authority of the f
Page 59 and 60:
A study of the Flood would therefor
Page 61 and 62:
Evolution is purely speculation. It
Page 63 and 64:
Fleming’s Modern Anthropology ver
Page 65 and 66:
graduate school to study hydraulic
Page 67 and 68:
eligious and biblical “moral” (
Page 69 and 70:
produces various different types of
Page 71 and 72:
instance, features Lammerts; it con
Page 73 and 74:
early ASA members were strict creat
Page 75 and 76:
egan in 1965. Biology: A Search for
Page 77 and 78:
THE BIBLE-SCIENCE ASSOCIATION The B
Page 79 and 80:
space technology, and a member of t
Page 81 and 82:
California Public Schools (Segraves
Page 83 and 84:
Henry Morris had a successful caree
Page 85 and 86:
the protestors objected to, but the
Page 87 and 88:
and creationist thought. Interestin
Page 89 and 90:
Lubenow and said, “You’re a Chr
Page 91 and 92:
Among the attendees at the Summer I
Page 93 and 94:
educes his bigoted evolutionist pro
Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER 4 THEORETICAL ISSUES: SCIEN
Page 97 and 98:
eality, nor is it intended to be. (
Page 99 and 100:
Assuming that present-day scientifi
Page 101 and 102:
devotes much of his book to the mor
Page 103 and 104:
Hitchcock. Their completely unfound
Page 105 and 106:
in the series did. Rev. Henry Beach
Page 107 and 108:
Materialism and Evolution (1932) is
Page 109 and 110:
(1984), he says: “The Bible is in
Page 111 and 112:
Faith, he says, is not dependent on
Page 113 and 114:
“Each creation command in Genesis
Page 115 and 116:
lawful process. This “lawful” o
Page 117 and 118:
used Gillespie’s argument to argu
Page 119 and 120:
The Bible, says Van Til, as God’s
Page 121 and 122:
make it conform to this straightfor
Page 123 and 124:
If the Bible and Christ and Christi
Page 125 and 126:
Jesus was either a “lunatic or th
Page 127 and 128:
EVOLUTION AS MAN’S ESCAPE FROM GO
Page 129 and 130:
Design, according to fundamentalist
Page 131 and 132:
disease, death, and decay all origi
Page 133 and 134:
“If God had not given each specie
Page 135 and 136:
In a book on astronomy, John Whitco
Page 137 and 138:
Pentecostalists typically affirm be
Page 139 and 140:
member. In the 1920s, Aimee Semple
Page 141 and 142:
James Kennedy, pastor of Coral Ridg
Page 143 and 144:
ook, calling it ‘a fairy tale,’
Page 145 and 146:
In the second half of his book O’
Page 147 and 148:
any species from another species. I
Page 149 and 150:
never heard of Marra before, but I
Page 151 and 152:
accuse him, as already noted, of fo
Page 153 and 154:
Jay Sekulow is a lawyer who represe
Page 155 and 156:
to “internal” evidence, Islamic
Page 157 and 158:
What initially strikes the reader c
Page 159 and 160:
Journal of the Victoria Institute,
Page 161 and 162:
(all of ICR and/or CRS), and Malcol
Page 163 and 164:
Creationism in South Africa is infl
Page 165 and 166:
also includes other Bible-science i
Page 167 and 168:
oard of advisors includes Gunther S
Page 169 and 170:
Evolution on Trial (1985), one of s
Page 171 and 172:
sponsored by UCLA, and partly funde
Page 173 and 174:
Christianity, then emigrated to Can
Page 175 and 176:
R.G. Elmendorf, the whimsical Catho
Page 177 and 178:
YOUNG-EARTH CREATIONISM CHAPTER 6 D
Page 179 and 180:
attacking evolution. Of the three,
Page 181 and 182:
(1970), arguing for the Gap Theory.
Page 183 and 184:
“These extinct animals and vegeta
Page 185 and 186:
Prior to Darwin the Gap Theory was
Page 187 and 188:
survived the catastrophic judgment
Page 189 and 190:
ut it did at least welcome all such
Page 191 and 192:
Convinced of the geological ages an
Page 193 and 194:
Science (1862), by Mrs. George J.C.
Page 195 and 196:
evidence for evolution, even in its
Page 197 and 198:
P.J. Wiseman, a British air commodo
Page 199 and 200:
ut he also criticizes “hyper-orth
Page 201 and 202:
espect, except in this one, that th
Page 203 and 204:
Men complain, however, that God wou
Page 205 and 206:
Davidheiser does not speculate whet
Page 207 and 208:
Paul Johnson, in Creation (1938), a
Page 209 and 210:
“fundamentalist groups-.called sc
Page 211 and 212:
God precipitated by shifting the ea
Page 213 and 214:
Heavenlies (1984). This book gives
Page 215 and 216:
contemptuous of academics, scientis
Page 217 and 218:
may be closer to the actual intent
Page 219 and 220:
addressed to Christian students fac
Page 221 and 222:
Despite disclaiming any direct link
Page 223 and 224: life are so infinitesimally small t
Page 225 and 226: an article which originally appeare
Page 227 and 228: standard creationist arguments as t
Page 229 and 230: Noah and the animals left the ark w
Page 231 and 232: The Duke of Argyll, in Primeval Man
Page 233 and 234: science from UC Berkeley; his other
Page 235 and 236: “true” science, was based on th
Page 237 and 238: and Eve. The most vigorous attack o
Page 239 and 240: millennialism which has been a main
Page 241 and 242: The basis of evolutionary theories
Page 243 and 244: Plymouth.Rock Foundation of New Ham
Page 245 and 246: ights of Christian students, though
Page 247 and 248: Charles Magne cites Rushdoony appro
Page 249 and 250: Materialists have been repeating ov
Page 251 and 252: CONCLUSIONS Because the main assump
Page 253 and 254: Historical and cultural conditions
Page 255 and 256: the standard proofs of evolution. E
Page 257 and 258: Barnes proposed an exponential decr
Page 259 and 260: 1973 Our Awesome Universe. Pasadena
Page 261 and 262: .......1975 Adam and the Ape: A Chr
Page 263 and 264: Bowler, Peter .......1984 Evolution
Page 265 and 266: .......1976 The Ark. Chino CA: Chic
Page 267 and 268: .......1971 The Exodus Problem and
Page 269 and 270: .......1979 [1975] The First Genesi
Page 271 and 272: Dewar, Douglas, and H.S. Shelton ..
Page 273: .......1833 General View of the Geo
Page 277 and 278: .......1967 “DNA Studies in Relat
Page 279 and 280: Hefley, James C. .......1986 “Chr
Page 281 and 282: .......1987 “Review of Glenn Mort
Page 283 and 284: .......1978 The Social Consequences
Page 285 and 286: .......1985 Evolution on Trial. Pri
Page 287 and 288: .......1974a A Challenge to Educati
Page 289 and 290: .......1986c “Report on Thomas J.
Page 291 and 292: Martin, T[homas] T[heodore] .......
Page 293 and 294: .......1946 That You Might Believe.
Page 295 and 296: Munk, Eli .......1974 The Seven Day
Page 297 and 298: .......N.d. [ca. 1912] “Evolution
Page 299 and 300: .......1906 Illogical Geology: The
Page 301 and 302: .......1984 [1981] Man—Ape or Ima
Page 303 and 304: Russell, Bertrand .......1935 Relig
Page 305 and 306: Setterfield, Barry, and Trevor G. N
Page 307 and 308: .......1969 [1958] Science Speaks:
Page 309 and 310: Toulmin, Stephen, and June Goodfiel
Page 311 and 312: Waisgerber, William, George F. Howe
Page 313 and 314: Whitehead, John W. .......1977 The
Page 315 and 316: Wolthuis, Enno .......1963 Science,
show all

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?