25.07.2013 Views

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Charles Magne cites Rushdoony approvingly in The Negro and the World Crisis<br />

(undated), in which he demonstrates that the Bible teaches that blacks were created<br />

separately, as animals (servants and beasts of burden <strong>for</strong> the Adamic white race), and<br />

have no souls. (Rushdoony, on the other hand, accuses evolutionists of claiming separate<br />

origins <strong>for</strong> the races, and insists that the Bible teaches the unity of all mankind.) Magne’s<br />

argument, expounded in many similar books and pamphlets, is a central doctrine of the<br />

“Christian Identity” movement, which is espoused by many neo-Nazi groups. In<br />

“Christian Identity” belief, blacks are a pre-Adamic creation, literally the “beasts” of<br />

Genesis (there being both four- and two-footed kinds). Eve was impregnated both by<br />

Adam, whose descendants are the white race, and by Satan the Serpent, from whose line<br />

Jews descend. “Christian Identity” doctrine is endorsed by many neo-Nazi groups.<br />

THE COSMONOMIC MOVEMENT<br />

Christian Reconstructionism has interesting ties with the Cosmonomic movement,<br />

which began in Holland around the turn of the century. Abraham Kuyper, the Dutch<br />

Prime Minister (1901-1905), was a conservative Calvinist theologian who campaigned<br />

against liberalism. Rushdoony attributes to Kuyper the development of the concept of<br />

“sphere laws.” It was Kuyper who first advanced the notion that all thought must<br />

proceed on presuppositional faith (the presuppositional apologetics developed later in this<br />

country by Van Til), recognizing God’s sovereignty in each “sphere,” rather than relying<br />

on reasoning solely from evidence.<br />

Herman Dooyeweerd, a Calvinist philosopher and law professor at the Free<br />

University of Amsterdam (founded by Kuyper in 1880 as a bastion against liberalism),<br />

expanded on the concept of “sphere law” and presuppositional apologetics in his massive<br />

three-volume treatise A New Critique of Theoretical Thought (1953-1957; originally<br />

published in 1935-1936 in Dutch; published in this country by Presbyterian and<br />

Re<strong>for</strong>med).<br />

The great turning point in my thought was marked by the discovery of the religious root of thought itself,<br />

whereby a new light was shed on the failure of all attempts, including my own, to bring about an inner<br />

synthesis between the Christian faith and a philosophy which is rooted in faith in the self-sufficiency of<br />

human reason.<br />

I came to understand the central significance of the “heart,” repeatedly proclaimed by Holy Scripture to<br />

be the religious root of human existence. On the basis of this central Christian point of view I saw the need<br />

of a revolution in philosophical thought of a very radical character. Confronted with the religious root of<br />

the creation, nothing less is in question than a relating of the whole temporal cosmos, in both its so-called<br />

“natural” and “spiritual” aspects, to this point of reference. In contrast to this basic Biblical conception, of<br />

what significance is a so-called ‘Copernican’ revolution which merely makes the ‘natural-aspects’ of<br />

temporal reality relative to a theoretical abstraction such as Kant’s ‘transcendental subject’?<br />

From a Christian point of view, the whole attitude of philosophical thought which proclaims the selfsufficiency<br />

of the latter, turns out to be unacceptable, because it withdraws human thought from the divine<br />

revelation in Christ Jesus.<br />

If temporal reality itself cannot be neutral with respect to its religious root, if in other words the whole<br />

notion of a static temporal cosmos ‘an sich,’ independent of the religious root of mankind, rests on a<br />

fundamental misconception, how can one any longer seriously believe in the religious neutrality of<br />

theoretical thought?<br />

One of the fundamental principles of this new philosophy is the cosmological basic principle of sphere<br />

sovereignty. Its development was suggested by (the famous Dutch thinker and statesman) Abraham

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!