Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education Creationism - National Center for Science Education

25.07.2013 Views

Those “scientific creationists” who wrote and defended the Louj.siana bill may have been mistaken in thinking that such a de-Biblicized law would be upheld by the federal judiciary, but they knew that no other approach stood any chance at all. [1987:1] He chastised Robbins for claiming that creationism, and the Bible, must be believed by “blind credulity,” since the real facts of science support it (1987). It is ironic that Morris is accused of neglecting the Bible in his promotion of scientific creationism; this charge must be particularly galling to such a staunch fundamentalist, and explains why Morris pushes his biblicism so relentlessly when he can to audiences of the faithful where he can safely promote “biblical” creationism. After asserting that “scientific creationism is perfectly compatible with Biblical creation” in his response to Robbins, Morris adds that biblical creation, “of course, is of higher priority to the true Christian” (1987:4). In a later book, Morris states that “true biblical creationism is the answer to all human needs and problems” (1988b:129). The rejection by Robbins and Rushdoony of “evidentialist” apologetics is a significant departure from the traditional fundamentalist view of science: the Baconian- Newtonian ideal of pure inductivism and its attendant horror of speculative hypotheses; the Common Sense philosophy of the Princeton theologians, which assumed that nature, like the Bible, was utterly perspicuous and accessible to ordinary reasoning, by observation and arrangement of facts. The Princeton theologians, who developed the doctrine of biblical inerrancy, in effect denied presuppositional apologetics by claiming that Christianity could stand solely by its appeal to reasoning from facts—facts, and reason, available to believer and non-believer both. Marsden says that Benjamin Warfield was “mystified” by the Calvinist approach, which presumed that, by starting from different presuppositions, non-Christians could never reason their way to the same conclusions as Christians, and quotes him as saying that Christianity, the “Apologetic religion,” will “reason its way to its dominion” (1980:115). Hodge had, as Barr notes, “unbounded” confidence in reason. Hodge rejected rationality which was not based on scriptural revelation, but declared that “Reason must judge of the Evidences of a Revelation”: reason was necessary and sufficient for acceptance of biblical truth. He maintained that “reason must judge of the evidence by which a revelation is supported” (Hodge 1883:53). It is “clearly a prerogative of reason” to judge the truthfulness of Scripture: the Bible “never demanded faith except on the ground of adequate evidence.” It will be noted that the ostensibly non-religious “scientific” creationist approach criticized by Rushdoony is in large part derived from Hodge’s Princeton Theology, and that both Rushdoony (via Van Til and Kuyper) and the Princeton theologians laid claim to the Calvinist tradition. Rushdoony’s Orthodox Presbyterianism, and the Dutch Reformed theology of the Cosmonomic Movement (a direct descendant from Kuyper via Dooyeweerd), seem to lie more squarely within the original spirit of Calvinism, however, than does Hodge’s appeal to reason alone. POST-MILLENNIALISM AND CHRISTIAN RECONSTRUCTIONISM Presuppositional apologetics is one of the key doctrines of the Christian Reconstruction movement; others are post-millennial eschatology, and a radical form of theonomy (“God’s law”). Christian Reconstructionists reject the dispensational pre-

millennialism which has been a mainstay of twentieth-century fundamentalism, claiming that it results in a pessimistic and fatalistic outlook on earthly existence. Post-mills believe that Christianity will triumph over the world, and that Christians will take over, eventually ushering in the Millennium through their successful efforts at reconstructing society. Rejecting the dispensational view that the Old Testament “dispensation” or covenant no longer applies to mankind, Reconstructionists believe that Old Testament law is still valid: their reconstructed Christian society will be a strict Old Testament theocracy. They stress that biblical principles must be applied to government and to all other fields, including science, and they urge Christians to “take dominion” over mankind as well as over the earth, and reconquer the world for Christ. The titles of many Reconstructionist books indicate this aggressive Dominion optimism and activism: J. Marcellus Kik’s An Eschatology of Victory (1971), David Chilton’s Paradise Restored: An Eschatology of Dominion (1985), John Jefferson Davis’s Christ’s Victorious Kingdom: Postmillennialism Reconsidered (1986), Robert Thoburn’s The Christian and Politics (1984), Gary North’s Unconditional Surrender: God’s Program for Victory (1981). Reconstructionists accuse pre-mills of passivity and fatalism; of abandoning hope that the world can be wholly converted and of waiting instead for the return of Christ and the Rapture; of relying on scare tactics for superficial conversions—getting people to accept Jesus simply in order to escape Hell; of only caring about counting souls nominally saved, and of not being concerned with building a truly Christian society because of their belief that the world will reject Christ in these End Times before He comes in person to initiate the Millennium over this fallen world. They charge that the pre-mill attitude is ineffective for promoting critical concerns, including creationism. Pre-mills in turn accuse the post-mills, and other advocates of “Dominion Theology,” of embracing New Age occultism and similar humanistic temptations of Satan; of emphasizing worldly success and materialism rather than spiritual values; and of being susceptible to materialistic heresies such as “Prosperity Gospel” and “Christian” psychology. The theological rivalry between these rival camps is often fierce. For example, Constance Cumbey, author of the popular Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow (1983), an expose of the New Age movement claiming that it is derived from the same occult sources as Nazism, wrote a sequel called A Planned Deception: The Staging of a New Age “Messiah” (1985), in which she accused Pat Robertson of promoting New Age occultism and counterfeit miracles inspired by Satan, and of promoting the heresy of seeking to “usher in Christ’s reign right here on earth.” Dave Hunt, co-author of the influential book The Seduction of Christianity (1985), is likewise engaged in a bitter feud against post-mills. He argues that Dominion Theology, with its stress on gaining worldly power and wealth, is a Trojan Horse opening the gates to New Age beliefs, occultism and other Satanic counterfeits. The Reconstructionists are outraged by such accusations (though they admit that some Christians have foolishly adopted unbiblical New Age techniques). They reply that Hunt has mistaken the optimistic post-mill eschatology, and its belief that it will reconquer the world for Christ, for New Age doctrines. (And they strenuously insist that this post-mill optimism has no relation to evolutionism, as the pre-mills charge.) Reconstructionists blame occultism and paranormal phenomena (which they fervently believe in) squarely on humanistic evolution, which, they argue, denies the very basis of

millennialism which has been a mainstay of twentieth-century fundamentalism, claiming<br />

that it results in a pessimistic and fatalistic outlook on earthly existence. Post-mills<br />

believe that Christianity will triumph over the world, and that Christians will take over,<br />

eventually ushering in the Millennium through their successful ef<strong>for</strong>ts at reconstructing<br />

society. Rejecting the dispensational view that the Old Testament “dispensation” or<br />

covenant no longer applies to mankind, Reconstructionists believe that Old Testament<br />

law is still valid: their reconstructed Christian society will be a strict Old Testament<br />

theocracy. They stress that biblical principles must be applied to government and to all<br />

other fields, including science, and they urge Christians to “take dominion” over mankind<br />

as well as over the earth, and reconquer the world <strong>for</strong> Christ. The titles of many<br />

Reconstructionist books indicate this aggressive Dominion optimism and activism: J.<br />

Marcellus Kik’s An Eschatology of Victory (1971), David Chilton’s Paradise Restored:<br />

An Eschatology of Dominion (1985), John Jefferson Davis’s Christ’s Victorious<br />

Kingdom: Postmillennialism Reconsidered (1986), Robert Thoburn’s The Christian and<br />

Politics (1984), Gary North’s Unconditional Surrender: God’s Program <strong>for</strong> Victory<br />

(1981).<br />

Reconstructionists accuse pre-mills of passivity and fatalism; of abandoning hope<br />

that the world can be wholly converted and of waiting instead <strong>for</strong> the return of Christ and<br />

the Rapture; of relying on scare tactics <strong>for</strong> superficial conversions—getting people to<br />

accept Jesus simply in order to escape Hell; of only caring about counting souls<br />

nominally saved, and of not being concerned with building a truly Christian society<br />

because of their belief that the world will reject Christ in these End Times be<strong>for</strong>e He<br />

comes in person to initiate the Millennium over this fallen world. They charge that the<br />

pre-mill attitude is ineffective <strong>for</strong> promoting critical concerns, including creationism.<br />

Pre-mills in turn accuse the post-mills, and other advocates of “Dominion<br />

Theology,” of embracing New Age occultism and similar humanistic temptations of<br />

Satan; of emphasizing worldly success and materialism rather than spiritual values; and<br />

of being susceptible to materialistic heresies such as “Prosperity Gospel” and “Christian”<br />

psychology. The theological rivalry between these rival camps is often fierce. For<br />

example, Constance Cumbey, author of the popular Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow<br />

(1983), an expose of the New Age movement claiming that it is derived from the same<br />

occult sources as Nazism, wrote a sequel called A Planned Deception: The Staging of a<br />

New Age “Messiah” (1985), in which she accused Pat Robertson of promoting New Age<br />

occultism and counterfeit miracles inspired by Satan, and of promoting the heresy of<br />

seeking to “usher in Christ’s reign right here on earth.” Dave Hunt, co-author of the<br />

influential book The Seduction of Christianity (1985), is likewise engaged in a bitter feud<br />

against post-mills. He argues that Dominion Theology, with its stress on gaining worldly<br />

power and wealth, is a Trojan Horse opening the gates to New Age beliefs, occultism and<br />

other Satanic counterfeits.<br />

The Reconstructionists are outraged by such accusations (though they admit that<br />

some Christians have foolishly adopted unbiblical New Age techniques). They reply that<br />

Hunt has mistaken the optimistic post-mill eschatology, and its belief that it will<br />

reconquer the world <strong>for</strong> Christ, <strong>for</strong> New Age doctrines. (And they strenuously insist that<br />

this post-mill optimism has no relation to evolutionism, as the pre-mills charge.)<br />

Reconstructionists blame occultism and paranormal phenomena (which they fervently<br />

believe in) squarely on humanistic evolution, which, they argue, denies the very basis of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!