Creationism - National Center for Science Education

Creationism - National Center for Science Education Creationism - National Center for Science Education

25.07.2013 Views

This being the case, Rusch argues, we should not expect to be able to date the beginning of the earth, since the apparent pre-Creation time is illusory rather than real. Rusch cites discordant radiometric dates as evidence that the world was indeed created this way. GAP THEORY: RECENT ADVOCATES AND VARIANTS Both the standard Gap Theory of creationism and Day-Age creationism remain surprisingly popular today. There are also a number of variants and hybrids. Arno Gaebelein, one of Scofield’s consulting editors for his Reference Bible, and the influential editor of the pre-millennialist journal Our Hope, argued for the Gap Theory in The Conflict of the Ages (1933). He devoted a chapter to Satan’s pre-Adamic reign, and traced the roots of the hideous modern evils of atheism, evolution, the Illuminati Conspiracy, and Bolshevism back to this primordial rebellion against God. Louis Talbot, chancellor of Biola College (Bible Institute of Los Angeles) and Talbot Theological Seminary, promoted the Gap Theory in God’s Plan of the Ages (1946; originally 1936), a book which presented dispensational pre-millennialism. Many people imagine the Bible teaches that the earth was created in six solar days, but nowhere does the Bible say so... Very clearly the Scriptures teach that God renovated a chaotic earth; and having brought order out of chaos, He created a new being—man—and gave him dominion over the renovated earth. [1946:12,14] L. Allen Higley, the Wheaton College chemistry and geology professor who became the first president of the short-lived creationist Religion and Science Association in 1935, was a Gap Theory promoter, though the Association founders were young-earth Flood Geology advocates. The other Association members considered the Gap Theory to be “utter foolishness, both Biblically and scientifically,” but apparently, according to Morris, thought they could convince Higley to abandon his support of it. However, as Morris notes ruefully, Higley remained committed to it, and his later book Science and Truth (1940) was “surely one of the strongest expositions of the gap theory ever published” (1984b:115). Though he lamented Higley’s allegiance to the Gap Theory, Morris himself, foremost promoter of strict young-earth creationism and Flood Geology, who devotes much time and energy to refuting the Gap Theory, Day-Age creationism, and other oldearth types of creationism as dangerous compromises with evolution, once partially succumbed to its temptation. The original edition of his first book, That You Might Believe (1946), allowed for (though it did not insist upon) the Gap Theory. The first verse of the Bible describes the original creation of the earth and, if not the sidereal universe, at least the solar system. There is considerable Scriptural evidence, however, that this original creation was later destroyed, possibly as the result of the sin of Satan and the angelic beings who chose to follow him. The condition of the destroyed earth is, according to this view, then described in the second verse of the first chapter of Genesis. Thus, the interval between the first and second verses of Genesis may be interpreted as a very long period of time. The creative acts of the six days then refer to the rehabilitation of the destroyed earth and the creation of a new creature, man. This interpretation means that the age of the earth is not limited to a few thousand years, but may be as long as science may claim. [Morris 1946:80] In lectures to friendly audiences, Morris now demurely remarks that this original edition is—fortunately—unavailable.

Paul Johnson, in Creation (1938), a volume in the Jehovah’s Witnesses Epiphany Studies in the Scriptures series, specifically denied subscribing to the standard Gap Theory, but his interpretation is much the same. He holds that there was a long period prior to the six creation days. God set matter (gases) in motion in Genesis 1:1; this unihabitable primeval chaos then gradually condensed and cooled. Johnson specified that each creation ‘day’ was 7,000 years long. The Laymen’s Home Missionary Movement, a Witness group which split from the followers of Rutherford, still distributes Johnson’s book, and repeats his distinctive cosmogony in tracts such as The Bible vs. Evolution and The Evolution Theory Examined—though without attribution. The latter tract quotes a few fairly recent scientific sources, and the casual reader cannot know that most of the “scientific” arguments are taken from Johnson’s 1938 book. The Jehovah’s Witnesses proper (followers of Rutherford) produced the classic anti-evolution book Did Man Get Here By Evolution or by Creation? (1967), published in thirteen languages and over eighteen million copies. The Witnesses assert that man was created about 6,000 years ago but allow for a Day-Age interpretation of the six days of creation. They also allow for a Gap Theory interpretation as well (thus combining the two), though they do not stress this (1967:97). The Witnesses’ new (1985) book, Life— How Did It Get Here?: By Evolution Or by Creation?, an updated version of the 1967 classic, which is richly illustrated and includes many more recent anti-evolution quotes, is somewhat more explicit in allowing for the Gap Theory in addition to a Day-Age interpretation: The first part of Genesis indicates that the earth could have existed for billions of years before the first Genesis “day,” though it does not say for how long. However, it does describe what earth’s condition was just before that first “day” began: “Now the earth proved to be formless and waste...” [1985:26] Both the 1967 and 1985 books go on to present a Day-Age interpretation in more detail. Carl Theodore Schwarze, a professor of civil engineering at NYU and a member of the Plymouth Brethren, supported a Gap Theory scheme in conjunction with his development of the pre-Flood Canopy theory (see later). In The Harmony of Science and the Bible (1942) and in The Marvel of Earth’s Canopies (1957) he argued that this canopy was formed in pre-Adamic times. Satan was ruler over “intelligent and powerful creatures that inhabited this earth before Adam”: the fallen angels, or demons. This sinful world was destroyed in an atomic blast which lofted up the Canopy. Schwarze suggested that Satan or his evil followers triggered this cataclysmic, world-destroying explosion by reckless dabbling in atomic research. This explosion is the destruction of the world described in Genesis 1:2; the future destruction of the world prophesied in II Peter 3:10 will probably be a similar nuclear explosion (1942:54-60; 1957:12-13,57). A pamphlet by the International Christian Crusade of Toronto, A Biblical Cosmology (1976), argues against both evolution and young-earth creationism, presenting in its stead the Gap Theory. Ussher’s chronology is defended as valid for events since the re-creation. (John Howitt was the unlisted author of this and other ICC pamphlets, including the one which converted Gish to creationism. These other ICC pamphlets by Howitt do not discuss the Gap Theory or any events prior to the six-day creation.) Why We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution (1959; now in its eighth edition), by Fred John Meldau, editor of Christian Victory Magazine, is a compendium of creation-

Paul Johnson, in Creation (1938), a volume in the Jehovah’s Witnesses Epiphany<br />

Studies in the Scriptures series, specifically denied subscribing to the standard Gap<br />

Theory, but his interpretation is much the same. He holds that there was a long period<br />

prior to the six creation days. God set matter (gases) in motion in Genesis 1:1; this<br />

unihabitable primeval chaos then gradually condensed and cooled. Johnson specified that<br />

each creation ‘day’ was 7,000 years long. The Laymen’s Home Missionary Movement, a<br />

Witness group which split from the followers of Ruther<strong>for</strong>d, still distributes Johnson’s<br />

book, and repeats his distinctive cosmogony in tracts such as The Bible vs. Evolution and<br />

The Evolution Theory Examined—though without attribution. The latter tract quotes a<br />

few fairly recent scientific sources, and the casual reader cannot know that most of the<br />

“scientific” arguments are taken from Johnson’s 1938 book.<br />

The Jehovah’s Witnesses proper (followers of Ruther<strong>for</strong>d) produced the classic<br />

anti-evolution book Did Man Get Here By Evolution or by Creation? (1967), published in<br />

thirteen languages and over eighteen million copies. The Witnesses assert that man was<br />

created about 6,000 years ago but allow <strong>for</strong> a Day-Age interpretation of the six days of<br />

creation. They also allow <strong>for</strong> a Gap Theory interpretation as well (thus combining the<br />

two), though they do not stress this (1967:97). The Witnesses’ new (1985) book, Life—<br />

How Did It Get Here?: By Evolution Or by Creation?, an updated version of the 1967<br />

classic, which is richly illustrated and includes many more recent anti-evolution quotes, is<br />

somewhat more explicit in allowing <strong>for</strong> the Gap Theory in addition to a Day-Age<br />

interpretation:<br />

The first part of Genesis indicates that the earth could have existed <strong>for</strong> billions of years be<strong>for</strong>e the first<br />

Genesis “day,” though it does not say <strong>for</strong> how long. However, it does describe what earth’s condition was<br />

just be<strong>for</strong>e that first “day” began: “Now the earth proved to be <strong>for</strong>mless and waste...” [1985:26]<br />

Both the 1967 and 1985 books go on to present a Day-Age interpretation in more detail.<br />

Carl Theodore Schwarze, a professor of civil engineering at NYU and a member<br />

of the Plymouth Brethren, supported a Gap Theory scheme in conjunction with his<br />

development of the pre-Flood Canopy theory (see later). In The Harmony of <strong>Science</strong> and<br />

the Bible (1942) and in The Marvel of Earth’s Canopies (1957) he argued that this<br />

canopy was <strong>for</strong>med in pre-Adamic times. Satan was ruler over “intelligent and powerful<br />

creatures that inhabited this earth be<strong>for</strong>e Adam”: the fallen angels, or demons. This<br />

sinful world was destroyed in an atomic blast which lofted up the Canopy. Schwarze<br />

suggested that Satan or his evil followers triggered this cataclysmic, world-destroying<br />

explosion by reckless dabbling in atomic research. This explosion is the destruction of<br />

the world described in Genesis 1:2; the future destruction of the world prophesied in II<br />

Peter 3:10 will probably be a similar nuclear explosion (1942:54-60; 1957:12-13,57).<br />

A pamphlet by the International Christian Crusade of Toronto, A Biblical<br />

Cosmology (1976), argues against both evolution and young-earth creationism,<br />

presenting in its stead the Gap Theory. Ussher’s chronology is defended as valid <strong>for</strong><br />

events since the re-creation. (John Howitt was the unlisted author of this and other ICC<br />

pamphlets, including the one which converted Gish to creationism. These other ICC<br />

pamphlets by Howitt do not discuss the Gap Theory or any events prior to the six-day<br />

creation.)<br />

Why We Believe in Creation Not in Evolution (1959; now in its eighth edition), by<br />

Fred John Meldau, editor of Christian Victory Magazine, is a compendium of creation-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!