Post Occupancy Evaluation - UCSF Helen Diller Family ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Conclusion Engineering Infrastructure and Maintenance • Maintenance: • Vivarium is easily maintained via overhead catwalk and external access • More isolation valves desired at the branches • Refrigerators in the hallway create issues of access, noise and require more frequent filter change out due to foot traffic • Light fixture replacement in atrium steps is infrequent • LN2 spills in equipment rooms have cracked vinyl tile • Most finishes in high traffic areas have worn well except for cracks in lobby floor • Furniture for casual seating is not intended for high traffic area – already showing signs of wear • Access to the fan coils units for maintenance is difficult Post Occupancy Evaluation January 7, 2011
Conclusion Psychological, Social and Cultural • Building design serves as a vehicle to attract researchers and funding • Atrium is well used and supports a positive image to visitors • First floor auditorium is used for weekly seminars – planned collaborations • The quantity and capacity of formal meeting spaces is appropriate • Co-located PI’s in office block positively supports collaboration • Frequency of informal collaboration between lab groups is low • Open labs have reverse effect of fostering interactions • Overwhelming number of people in open lab space (48-64) • Should look at creating neighborhoods of 16-20 person range • No dedicated collaboration space within the lab environment • Noise and acoustical privacy within the lab is a distraction to people wanting to perform focus work Post Occupancy Evaluation January 7, 2011
Page 1 and 2:
Post Occupancy Evaluation Report of
Page 3 and 4:
Summary of Findings Building Descri
Page 5 and 6:
Summary of Findings Vivarium design
Page 7 and 8:
Post Occupancy Evaluation The purpo
Page 9 and 10:
METHODOLOGY
Page 11 and 12:
Conduct: Post Occupancy Evaluation
Page 13 and 14:
Demographics: web survey respondent
Page 15 and 16:
The Process Post WWII Growth of Sci
Page 17 and 18:
Translational Research: Kit of Part
Page 19 and 20: FACILITY OVERVIEW
Page 21 and 22: Performance Criteria : Post Occupan
Page 23 and 24: work styles This section describes
Page 25 and 26: Agree or Disagree: Your assigned in
Page 27 and 28: Findings Takes into account the fol
Page 29 and 30: Goal: Provide a state-of-the-art fa
Page 31 and 32: Safety Features Typical lab floor
Page 33 and 34: Organization: vivarium procedure &
Page 35 and 36: Engineering Findings Post Occupancy
Page 37 and 38: Engineering Findings Safety shower
Page 39 and 40: measured foot-candles 68 N 15 23 30
Page 41 and 42: office Typical floor: access to day
Page 43 and 44: Co-location Diller Has your group b
Page 45 and 46: Goal: Design elements will foster i
Page 47 and 48: office Organization: office area of
Page 49 and 50: Typical floor: teaming • informal
Page 51 and 52: collaboration Your work environment
Page 53 and 54: Goal: Optimize efficient use of spa
Page 55 and 56: Area analysis typical research floo
Page 57 and 58: Area analysis: vivarium “Placing
Page 59 and 60: Lab module analysis: planning Lab S
Page 61 and 62: Lab module analysis: flexibility Te
Page 63 and 64: Very High High Neutral Low Very Low
Page 65 and 66: Organization: shared support suppor
Page 67 and 68: Conclusion Health, Safety and Secur
Page 69: Conclusion Engineering Infrastructu
show all

Post Occupancy Evaluation - UCSF Helen Diller Family ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?