Post Occupancy Evaluation - UCSF Helen Diller Family ...
Post Occupancy Evaluation - UCSF Helen Diller Family ...
Post Occupancy Evaluation - UCSF Helen Diller Family ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Conclusion<br />
Health, Safety and Security<br />
• Health:<br />
• “Lighting is very poor: 1) proximity of CVRI building affects light levels and access to<br />
daylight; 2) lighting in a lab should be directly overhead for fine work (recessed lighting is<br />
not helpful in lab work)”<br />
• Fume Hoods meet Cal OSHA 150fpm face velocity for carcinogen use<br />
• Incorrect installation of Safety Shower heads causes paint failure and potential for mold<br />
and mildew.<br />
• Improper ventilation in the darkroom causes odors to build up.<br />
• Safety:<br />
• Negative air flow of labs is good<br />
• Safety Showers near electrical power panels create a safety hazard<br />
• Eye wash stations at rear wall of tissue culture rooms are remote from exit door and some<br />
are blocked by furnishings<br />
• Write-up space within the lab is not ideal<br />
• exposure to chemicals adjacent to bench<br />
• environment is not conducive to performing detailed focus work,<br />
• back to back layout can cause difficulties circulating within the lab<br />
• Fire exits are lined by heavy equipment<br />
• Some equipment leaks into pathway, causing a slipping hazard<br />
• Seismic bracing is required for floor standing equipment<br />
• Bio-safety officer not involved in design of the BSL3 suite<br />
• DSA office placed away from labs within secure hallway<br />
• Security:<br />
• Building supports security protocols<br />
• Secure building – minimal property loss<br />
• Complaint of too many security points between office and lab<br />
<strong>Post</strong> <strong>Occupancy</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />
January 7, 2011