Post Occupancy Evaluation - UCSF Helen Diller Family ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Typical floor: ambient environment importance importance very high high neutral low very low very high high neutral low very low very low very low low neutral high satisfaction low neutral high very high very high Research Labs Office Post Occupancy Evaluation January 7, 2011 User Feedback: Respondents were asked to rate the level of importance each aspect has on their ability to perform their job and then rate their level of satisfaction with the building’s ability to achieve it. Web survey respondents who work in research space have a neutral to low level of satisfaction with their ambient environment. They rated most ambient aspects as important, except for visual privacy. This feedback is consistent with all lab focus groups. See page for actual light level and temperature readings. Web survey respondents who work in office space were generally satisfied with their ambient environment. They are most satisfied with access to daylight and least satisfied with acoustic privacy. Focus group feedback was consistent, citing poor acoustic properties in wall partitions and excess noise from the hvac system. acoustic privacy visual privacy control of light levels access to daylight general lighting temperature
Co-location Diller Has your group benefitted from the co-location of cancer research scientists, wet laboratories, dry laboratories and vivaria to collaboratively address cancer research while benefitting the community and the region? 3% Post Occupancy Evaluation January 7, 2011 27% 30% 40%
Page 1 and 2: Post Occupancy Evaluation Report of
Page 3 and 4: Summary of Findings Building Descri
Page 5 and 6: Summary of Findings Vivarium design
Page 7 and 8: Post Occupancy Evaluation The purpo
Page 9 and 10: METHODOLOGY
Page 11 and 12: Conduct: Post Occupancy Evaluation
Page 13 and 14: Demographics: web survey respondent
Page 15 and 16: The Process Post WWII Growth of Sci
Page 17 and 18: Translational Research: Kit of Part
Page 19 and 20: FACILITY OVERVIEW
Page 21 and 22: Performance Criteria : Post Occupan
Page 23 and 24: work styles This section describes
Page 25 and 26: Agree or Disagree: Your assigned in
Page 27 and 28: Findings Takes into account the fol
Page 29 and 30: Goal: Provide a state-of-the-art fa
Page 31 and 32: Safety Features Typical lab floor
Page 33 and 34: Organization: vivarium procedure &
Page 35 and 36: Engineering Findings Post Occupancy
Page 37 and 38: Engineering Findings Safety shower
Page 39 and 40: measured foot-candles 68 N 15 23 30
Page 41: office Typical floor: access to day
Page 45 and 46: Goal: Design elements will foster i
Page 47 and 48: office Organization: office area of
Page 49 and 50: Typical floor: teaming • informal
Page 51 and 52: collaboration Your work environment
Page 53 and 54: Goal: Optimize efficient use of spa
Page 55 and 56: Area analysis typical research floo
Page 57 and 58: Area analysis: vivarium “Placing
Page 59 and 60: Lab module analysis: planning Lab S
Page 61 and 62: Lab module analysis: flexibility Te
Page 63 and 64: Very High High Neutral Low Very Low
Page 65 and 66: Organization: shared support suppor
Page 67 and 68: Conclusion Health, Safety and Secur
Page 69 and 70: Conclusion Engineering Infrastructu
Page 71 and 72: Conclusion Psychological, Social an

Post Occupancy Evaluation - UCSF Helen Diller Family ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?