Post Occupancy Evaluation - UCSF Helen Diller Family ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

measured temperatures 73 N 73 70 72 72 Smith Cardiovascular Research Building 70 71 69 • Temperature ranges are within a comfortable level, but the velocity of the of the air coming from the supply creates a drafty experience for those sitting below slot diffusers. • Occupants in the shade of Smith Cardiovascular Research Building identified that the HVAC does not turn on as often speculating the thermostat is not in the direct sun. The location of the thermostats needs to be assessed as well as the tolerance used around the temperature set point for the labs. Post Occupancy Evaluation January 7, 2011 70 68 68 70 69
Engineering Findings Safety shower at electric panel Pneumatic waste conveying tube Post Occupancy Evaluation January 7, 2011 Participants were asked to indicate their satisfaction with lab utility/engineering with respect to quality, capacity and control. Engineering questions were discussed during focus group meetings and building tours. Highlights of lab engineering satisfaction include: • Plumbing: Plumbing capacity and sink locations are satisfactory. No issues reported with regards to capacity of the gases and DI water supply. • The quantity of the urinals and toilets in the men’s (1 urinal/1 toilet) and women’s (2 toilets) restrooms appears inadequate for the building occupancy. • The emergency showers are in some instances located near power panels creating a potential safety hazard and maintenance issue (see photo above.) • The bedding disposal system works fine most of the time. However, the pneumatic waste conveying tubing leading to the dumpster on level 1 gets blocked near the bedding dispenser (see photo below) requiring periodic disassembling for cleaning. • The location of the cage wash drains and their relatively steep slopes are a safety issue as some are located in the path of travel for the racks creating the potential for rack overturning. • The emergency eye wash in the procedure rooms are not properly sealed. Air is escaping through the gaps around the fixture.
Page 1 and 2: Post Occupancy Evaluation Report of
Page 3 and 4: Summary of Findings Building Descri
Page 5 and 6: Summary of Findings Vivarium design
Page 7 and 8: Post Occupancy Evaluation The purpo
Page 9 and 10: METHODOLOGY
Page 11 and 12: Conduct: Post Occupancy Evaluation
Page 13 and 14: Demographics: web survey respondent
Page 15 and 16: The Process Post WWII Growth of Sci
Page 17 and 18: Translational Research: Kit of Part
Page 19 and 20: FACILITY OVERVIEW
Page 21 and 22: Performance Criteria : Post Occupan
Page 23 and 24: work styles This section describes
Page 25 and 26: Agree or Disagree: Your assigned in
Page 27 and 28: Findings Takes into account the fol
Page 29 and 30: Goal: Provide a state-of-the-art fa
Page 31 and 32: Safety Features Typical lab floor
Page 33 and 34: Organization: vivarium procedure &
Page 35: Engineering Findings Post Occupancy
Page 39 and 40: measured foot-candles 68 N 15 23 30
Page 41 and 42: office Typical floor: access to day
Page 43 and 44: Co-location Diller Has your group b
Page 45 and 46: Goal: Design elements will foster i
Page 47 and 48: office Organization: office area of
Page 49 and 50: Typical floor: teaming • informal
Page 51 and 52: collaboration Your work environment
Page 53 and 54: Goal: Optimize efficient use of spa
Page 55 and 56: Area analysis typical research floo
Page 57 and 58: Area analysis: vivarium “Placing
Page 59 and 60: Lab module analysis: planning Lab S
Page 61 and 62: Lab module analysis: flexibility Te
Page 63 and 64: Very High High Neutral Low Very Low
Page 65 and 66: Organization: shared support suppor
Page 67 and 68: Conclusion Health, Safety and Secur
Page 69 and 70: Conclusion Engineering Infrastructu
Page 71 and 72: Conclusion Psychological, Social an

Post Occupancy Evaluation - UCSF Helen Diller Family ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?