Post Occupancy Evaluation - UCSF Helen Diller Family ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Safety, Security & Health Summary Card reader entries Tight entry corridor Seismic anchor tall items PPE strategy More lab support bench Elec. panels at showers Post Occupancy Evaluation January 7, 2011 • Card entries provide secure perimeter from lobby • Narrow corridor entries give way to people bumping into each other. • Seismically brace all tall cabinets & equipment. • Central PPE strategies encourage people to wear protective gear. • Increased bench space would limit people from having to bend over to use equipment. • Do not locate electrical panels at safety showers. • Improve ergonomics through height adjustable bio-safety cabinets. • Include EH&S earlier in designs for review, comments & approvals.
Organization: vivarium procedure & holding procedure & holding • Ratio of one holding room to one procedure reduces contamination risk & simplifies coordination usage. • Interstitial space improves ceiling accessibility for maintenance. • Bedding accumulates in disposal pipe to compactor, so tunnel wash needs to run 10 minutes longer to prevent clogs. • Tunnel wash reset button is located on 1 st floor, staff member has to go down to 1 st floor reset & then gown back in. • Condensation canopy weep not connected to drain. • Minimize drain locations for cart steering Holding Room Unconnected weep Procedure Room Post Occupancy Evaluation January 7, 2011 Floor trenches at doors preferred
Page 1 and 2: Post Occupancy Evaluation Report of
Page 3 and 4: Summary of Findings Building Descri
Page 5 and 6: Summary of Findings Vivarium design
Page 7 and 8: Post Occupancy Evaluation The purpo
Page 9 and 10: METHODOLOGY
Page 11 and 12: Conduct: Post Occupancy Evaluation
Page 13 and 14: Demographics: web survey respondent
Page 15 and 16: The Process Post WWII Growth of Sci
Page 17 and 18: Translational Research: Kit of Part
Page 19 and 20: FACILITY OVERVIEW
Page 21 and 22: Performance Criteria : Post Occupan
Page 23 and 24: work styles This section describes
Page 25 and 26: Agree or Disagree: Your assigned in
Page 27 and 28: Findings Takes into account the fol
Page 29 and 30: Goal: Provide a state-of-the-art fa
Page 31: Safety Features Typical lab floor
Page 35 and 36: Engineering Findings Post Occupancy
Page 37 and 38: Engineering Findings Safety shower
Page 39 and 40: measured foot-candles 68 N 15 23 30
Page 41 and 42: office Typical floor: access to day
Page 43 and 44: Co-location Diller Has your group b
Page 45 and 46: Goal: Design elements will foster i
Page 47 and 48: office Organization: office area of
Page 49 and 50: Typical floor: teaming • informal
Page 51 and 52: collaboration Your work environment
Page 53 and 54: Goal: Optimize efficient use of spa
Page 55 and 56: Area analysis typical research floo
Page 57 and 58: Area analysis: vivarium “Placing
Page 59 and 60: Lab module analysis: planning Lab S
Page 61 and 62: Lab module analysis: flexibility Te
Page 63 and 64: Very High High Neutral Low Very Low
Page 65 and 66: Organization: shared support suppor
Page 67 and 68: Conclusion Health, Safety and Secur
Page 69 and 70: Conclusion Engineering Infrastructu
Page 71 and 72: Conclusion Psychological, Social an

Post Occupancy Evaluation - UCSF Helen Diller Family ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?