25.07.2013 Views

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

"a series of important <strong>and</strong> difficult experiments on the relation of heat<br />

to mechanical force, which supplied the chief points in which the comparison of<br />

the new theory <strong>with</strong> experience was still wanting" 342.<br />

Joule's experiments are actually given great attention, in contrast <strong>with</strong><br />

the 1847 Erhaltung. This time, of course, the conversion factors are correct. For<br />

the determination of the equivalent through the production of heat from work<br />

utilising friction, three series of experiments are recalled: water in a brass vessel<br />

(equivalent=424.9 gramme-meters necessary to raise of one degree °C one<br />

gramme of water), mercury in an iron vessel (425 <strong>and</strong> 426.3), conical rings<br />

rubbing against each other surrounded by mercury (426.7 <strong>and</strong> 425.6). The reverse<br />

determination, that is, the conversion of heat into work through the expansion of<br />

perfect gases, is also discussed; results (also due to Regnault's measurements)<br />

give : <strong>with</strong> air 426.0; <strong>with</strong> oxygen 425.7; <strong>with</strong> nitrogen 431.3; <strong>with</strong> hydrogen<br />

425.3.<br />

The agreement between the two set of experiments, realised <strong>with</strong> such<br />

different methods is really remarkable. There can be few doubts that "heat is a<br />

new form in which a quantity of work can appear" 343.<br />

A comment on the presentation of the principle is necessary here: the<br />

expression of the principle above 344 shows once again that the stress is on the<br />

correlation of forces, but Helmholtz goes even further in hiding his own<br />

conceptual model of central forces that had played such a great role in the<br />

original Erhaltung . In the extension of the law to all natural processes, the<br />

question of the nature of heat became specially important. "In the answer lay the<br />

chief difference between the older <strong>and</strong> newer views in these respects". Moreover<br />

in virtue of the relevance of this question:<br />

"Many physicists designate that view of Nature corresponding to the<br />

law of conservation of force <strong>with</strong> the name of the Mechanical Theory of Heat" 345.<br />

Thus Helmholtz stresses an element, the conceptual model of heat,<br />

which despite being universally acceptable <strong>and</strong> also accepted, was by no means<br />

his own specific contribution to the problem. After an acknowledgement of the<br />

results of the kinetic theory of gases due to Krönig, Clausius <strong>and</strong> Maxwell 346 <strong>and</strong><br />

342 Helmholtz PL 1873 p.320.<br />

343 Helmholtz PL 1873 p.349.<br />

344 See note 340.<br />

345 Helmholtz PL 1873 p.342.<br />

346 Helmholtz PL 1873 p.350.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!