Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...
Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...
Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
conformity <strong>with</strong> Gauss in his magnetical researches" 262 as the sum of tensions<br />
consumed by the motion from infinity to r, <strong>and</strong>, equivalently, as the sum of the vis<br />
viva produced. Thus :<br />
"the increase of vis viva in any movement must be considered equal to the<br />
difference of the potential at the end of the trajectory <strong>with</strong> respect to the potential<br />
at the beginning" 263.<br />
That is, the sum of tension forces is equivalent to the difference of potentials:<br />
− ∫ r<br />
R<br />
φ dr = e1e2 R − e1e2 r<br />
<strong>and</strong>, of course, also to the gain in vis viva caused by passing from the distance R<br />
to r.<br />
Helmholtz then introduces the concept of the potential of a body in itself <strong>and</strong> of<br />
the potential of a body on another. In a specific case given as an example, he<br />
calculates the difference of potentials before <strong>and</strong> after the movement of a<br />
quantity of electricity. This difference is defined as equivalent to the quantity of<br />
work done:<br />
-(V + (Wa +Wb)/2) 264<br />
As already seen Clausius in 1852 criticised Helmholtz assertion that in the above<br />
expression the potential W of a body on itself is not equal to the corresponding<br />
work done, but twice as much (the corresponding work is in fact W/2). The<br />
accusation of not having understood the deep relations between potential <strong>and</strong><br />
work was a serious one from Clausius' point of view.<br />
Clausius in the same1852 paper had established a relation between vis viva <strong>and</strong><br />
potential different from that of <strong>Helmholtz's</strong> Erhaltung. He started from the vis<br />
viva theorem <strong>and</strong> equated the increase of vis viva to the quantity of mechanical<br />
work produced during the same time in the system 265. Clausius did not accept<br />
<strong>Helmholtz's</strong> "sum of tension forces" (potential energy) <strong>and</strong> the corresponding<br />
interpretation of the conservation principle. For Clausius, work, being in most<br />
cases a total differential <strong>and</strong> thus its integral depending only on the initial <strong>and</strong><br />
final positions, can be identified <strong>with</strong> a difference of potentials. The potential of<br />
an exterior system of masses on a given system is introduced as the function:<br />
262 Helmholtz Erhaltung p. 38.<br />
263 Helmholtz Erhaltung p. 38.<br />
264 Helmholtz Erhaltung Pp.42-3.<br />
265 Clausius "Electric Discharge" p.3.