25.07.2013 Views

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

conformity <strong>with</strong> Gauss in his magnetical researches" 262 as the sum of tensions<br />

consumed by the motion from infinity to r, <strong>and</strong>, equivalently, as the sum of the vis<br />

viva produced. Thus :<br />

"the increase of vis viva in any movement must be considered equal to the<br />

difference of the potential at the end of the trajectory <strong>with</strong> respect to the potential<br />

at the beginning" 263.<br />

That is, the sum of tension forces is equivalent to the difference of potentials:<br />

− ∫ r<br />

R<br />

φ dr = e1e2 R − e1e2 r<br />

<strong>and</strong>, of course, also to the gain in vis viva caused by passing from the distance R<br />

to r.<br />

Helmholtz then introduces the concept of the potential of a body in itself <strong>and</strong> of<br />

the potential of a body on another. In a specific case given as an example, he<br />

calculates the difference of potentials before <strong>and</strong> after the movement of a<br />

quantity of electricity. This difference is defined as equivalent to the quantity of<br />

work done:<br />

-(V + (Wa +Wb)/2) 264<br />

As already seen Clausius in 1852 criticised Helmholtz assertion that in the above<br />

expression the potential W of a body on itself is not equal to the corresponding<br />

work done, but twice as much (the corresponding work is in fact W/2). The<br />

accusation of not having understood the deep relations between potential <strong>and</strong><br />

work was a serious one from Clausius' point of view.<br />

Clausius in the same1852 paper had established a relation between vis viva <strong>and</strong><br />

potential different from that of <strong>Helmholtz's</strong> Erhaltung. He started from the vis<br />

viva theorem <strong>and</strong> equated the increase of vis viva to the quantity of mechanical<br />

work produced during the same time in the system 265. Clausius did not accept<br />

<strong>Helmholtz's</strong> "sum of tension forces" (potential energy) <strong>and</strong> the corresponding<br />

interpretation of the conservation principle. For Clausius, work, being in most<br />

cases a total differential <strong>and</strong> thus its integral depending only on the initial <strong>and</strong><br />

final positions, can be identified <strong>with</strong> a difference of potentials. The potential of<br />

an exterior system of masses on a given system is introduced as the function:<br />

262 Helmholtz Erhaltung p. 38.<br />

263 Helmholtz Erhaltung p. 38.<br />

264 Helmholtz Erhaltung Pp.42-3.<br />

265 Clausius "Electric Discharge" p.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!