25.07.2013 Views

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Needless to say the plan was to be carefully carried out, but not <strong>with</strong>out<br />

the introduction of subtle innovations of extraordinary relevance, which are not<br />

limited to overcoming the caloric model for heat still adopted by Carnot <strong>and</strong><br />

Clapeyron. The assertion "in the same way" refers to the methodology, but by<br />

no means indicates that the same expression of the principle was to be applied.<br />

Helmholtz in fact reformulates the principle of impossibility of perpetual motion,<br />

utilising the term "work" ("Arbeit"), <strong>and</strong> mechanical terms as "force" <strong>and</strong><br />

"velocity":<br />

"...the quantity of work obtained when a system of bodies moves from<br />

one position to another under the action of specific forces must be the same as<br />

that needed to carry the system back to the original position, independent of the<br />

way, the trajectory or the velocity of the change" 97.<br />

Thus, the term "Arbeit" is now a function of the state (position) of the<br />

system, it is a total differential : in a closed path work cannot be created, but<br />

cannot be destroyed. This is a first great innovation. The new concept of work,<br />

being now a function of the positions, can be equated to another function of the<br />

position: the vis viva.<br />

In fact from Galileo's relation<br />

v=√2gh,<br />

where v is the final velocity acquired by a body of mass m in a fall from<br />

height h under the acceleration g, we derive that<br />

the work mgh equates the expression<br />

,<br />

which is a function of the position too. Here Helmholtz uses again the<br />

word "Arbeit" for work, <strong>and</strong> following explicitly the French engineers' definition<br />

of"travail", in equating work <strong>and</strong> vis viva gives priority to the concept of work. In<br />

fact he defines<br />

<strong>and</strong> not as the measure of vis viva; in this way it<br />

"becomes identical <strong>with</strong> the quantity of work" 98.<br />

97 Helmholtz: Erh .P.8<br />

98 Compare this awareness of the role of the work concept <strong>with</strong> the difficulties in<br />

chapter 5 to adopt a definition of "potential in itself" equivalent to work. An indication of<br />

<strong>Helmholtz's</strong> theoretical rather than mathematical approach. See below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!