25.07.2013 Views

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

"Bericht", despite the application of the principle to an analysis of some physicochemical<br />

laws, is still largely dedicated to physiology. In the much longer<br />

Erhaltung , instead, physiology is confined to a few lines at the end of the last<br />

chapter. In the "Bericht" the equivalence principle based on the impossibility of<br />

perpetual motion (but also on the opposite impossibility of destroying motion:<br />

nothing can be created <strong>and</strong> nothing can be destroyed; a conservation of the<br />

coefficients of correlation applies) is present together <strong>with</strong> a model for many<br />

equivalents (the terms of the energy balance), but the equivalence principle, i.e.<br />

the correlation principle applied in the "Bericht" is very different from the<br />

mechanical principle of conservation of energy expressed in the Erhaltung. The<br />

equivalence principle is much closer to the ideas of Mayer <strong>and</strong> Joule, despite the<br />

fact that in 1846 Helmholtz did not know of their works (none of them was cited<br />

in the "Bericht"). In fact it only asserts the numerical equivalence of the effects<br />

involved <strong>and</strong> does not imply the assumption of central Newtonian forces <strong>and</strong> that<br />

every effect must have a mechanical interpretation in terms of potential <strong>and</strong><br />

kinetic energy 62. A final relevant point is that in the "Bericht" Helmholtz did not<br />

discuss the specific determinations of the mechanical equivalent of heat, despite<br />

his acceptance of the mechanical theory.<br />

In 1847 Helmholtz, while writing the Erhaltung, worked out a sixth<br />

paper 63 again dedicated to physiological problems, later to be reprinted in the<br />

"Physiologie" section of his collected papers..<br />

Here Helmholtz finally tried to link the problem of animal heat <strong>with</strong> that<br />

of the mechanical force produced by muscle action. Relevant to his purposes was<br />

to demonstrate that heat is produced in the muscle itself. He devised a very<br />

sensible thermocouple which, linked to an astatic galvanometer <strong>and</strong> a magnifying<br />

coil, could detect differences of temperature in the range of one thous<strong>and</strong>th of a<br />

degree centigrade. Through thorough experiments on frogs' legs Helmholtz was<br />

able to find evidence that heat is generated directly in the muscle tissue, that its<br />

origins are due to chemical processes <strong>and</strong> that production of heat in the nerves is<br />

negligible (<strong>and</strong> thus vital force could be disposed of on empirical grounds). The<br />

role of this experimental research on the sources of animal heat, carried forward<br />

together <strong>with</strong> <strong>and</strong> immediately after the writing of the Erhaltung, is very<br />

62Thus I cannot agree <strong>with</strong> Lenoir's assertion:"the physiology of muscle action laid<br />

before Helmholtz all the elements of conservation of energy" Lenoir Strat of Life P.211.<br />

63 Helmholtz "Wärmeentwicklung". A detailed analysis is given in Olesko & Holmes<br />

"Experiment" Sect 6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!