Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...
Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...
Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
force principle 522. Elkana tried to show 523 that Helmholtz was the "true"<br />
discoverer of energy conservation, but centres his attempt on the 1847 paper <strong>and</strong><br />
fails to see, among other problems 524, all the later reformulations of the principle.<br />
Cantor points at the difficulties of framing Helmholtz 525, but I think that Winters<br />
offers a good contribution in analysing <strong>Helmholtz's</strong> Erhaltung in comparison<br />
<strong>with</strong> his later works on energy 526 . Necessary I believe is also to discuss the use<br />
<strong>and</strong> modifications of the principle in the debates of the following decades 527.<br />
___________________________________<br />
From such an enlarged point of view, the whole problem of "simultaneity" <strong>and</strong> of<br />
"discovery" of "energy conservation" should be ab<strong>and</strong>oned. What Helmholtz<br />
really did in his Erhaltung was to lay the foundations of theoretical physics,<br />
through the conscious interplay of conceptual models, regulative principles,<br />
mathematical techniques <strong>and</strong> experimental results. The whole interplay was<br />
based on an explicit methodology <strong>and</strong> was meant to have the greatest generality<br />
of possible applications. From then on in physics the theory-experiment interplay<br />
was joined <strong>and</strong> often overcome by the theory-principle one. From the point of<br />
view of <strong>Helmholtz's</strong> approach, the other contributions can be seen as less<br />
sophisticated <strong>and</strong> less conscious, but not less interesting, approaches. At the end<br />
of the century the great debates of the "now mighty theoretical physics" 528 show<br />
the progress achieved: the mechanic, energetic, thermodynamic <strong>and</strong><br />
electromagnetic views of nature are the frameworks <strong>with</strong>in which basic studies<br />
on the history of energy conservation were written. I believe that contemporary<br />
history of energy studies can be enhanced if the problem is seen in terms of the<br />
522 Heimann, Peter. "Helmholtz <strong>and</strong> Kant: The Metaphysical Foundations of 'Über<br />
die Erhaltung der Kraft' ." In SHPS 5 (1974) : 205-38; P.208 n.13, <strong>and</strong> P.223.<br />
523 Elkana, Yehuda. "The <strong>Conservation</strong> of <strong>Energy</strong>: A case of Simultaneous<br />
Discovery?" In Arch Int Hist Sci 24 (1970): 31-60.; "<strong>Helmholtz's</strong> 'Kraft': An Illustration of<br />
Concepts in Flux". In HSPS 2 (1970): 263-98; The Discovery<br />
524 see: Clark, Peter. "Elkana on Helmholtz <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Conservation</strong> of <strong>Energy</strong>." In<br />
BJPS 27 (1976): 165-176.<br />
525 Cantor Locating<br />
526 Winters, Stephen. "Hermann von <strong>Helmholtz's</strong> Discovery of Force <strong>Conservation</strong>."<br />
Dissertation. The John Hopkins University, 1985.<br />
527 see my <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Electr Pp.59-74 <strong>and</strong> 110-21.<br />
528 C.Jungnickel,R.McCormmach, Intellectual Mastery of Nature , 2 vols, Chicago:<br />
Chicago U.P., 1986. 2nd vol.