25.07.2013 Views

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Planck asserts that the reduction of all the forms of energy to two main ones is a<br />

great merit, a simplification <strong>and</strong> a great heuristic tool, but that nevertheless this is<br />

insufficient to deal <strong>with</strong> in complicated situations, like electromagnetism, still<br />

partly unknown. This means that the principle 'per se', <strong>with</strong>out the contribution of<br />

experimental results, cannot give definite answers.<br />

To apply <strong>Helmholtz's</strong>'s principle to a process that takes place in a system of<br />

bodies it is necessary to add together all the different kinds of variations of vis<br />

viva on one side, the sum of tension forces on the other side <strong>and</strong> equate the two<br />

groups. The sum of all the identified terms representing the vis viva <strong>and</strong> the<br />

tension forces at a given instant is the "force" (energy) of the system, constant if<br />

the system is isolated. Of course all the identified different terms of the sum have<br />

to be numerically expressed on the basis of a common unity of measurement,<br />

usually mechanical work; thus their mechanical equivalent has to be found. But in<br />

this process of identification of the different terms contributing to the energy of<br />

the system we find a methodological difficulty:<br />

"there is not a general rule <strong>with</strong> which we can calculate a priori the value of the<br />

equivalent (i.e. the expression of the different terms), independently of the<br />

principle itself" 413<br />

Often in the past wrong identifications of the equivalents led to wrong<br />

conclusions (Planck quotes Descartes <strong>and</strong> Carnot 414).<br />

<strong>Helmholtz's</strong> principle <strong>with</strong> its reduction of all the energy terms to two main forms,<br />

kinetic <strong>and</strong> positional, is <strong>with</strong>out doubt a great heuristic tool to find out the<br />

different energy terms, but does not solve all the problems. That is, there is<br />

always an indetermination <strong>and</strong> then an arbitrariness in the identification <strong>and</strong><br />

expression of the energy terms.<br />

There is in fact a complicated interplay between the general framework of the<br />

principle <strong>and</strong> the empirical laws.<br />

From an existing <strong>and</strong> accepted empirical law the expressions of the tension<br />

forces <strong>and</strong> of the vis viva have to be identified (<strong>and</strong> the law rededuced). Instead<br />

for a realm of phenomena not yet described by laws or <strong>with</strong> laws not sufficiently<br />

corroborated, if we assume the principle to hold true some useful guide-lines for<br />

the formulations of empirical laws can be produced. Sometimes the principle<br />

leads to discover new laws, in other cases the discovery of new experimental<br />

laws will add new energy terms to the principle. Again new experimental data<br />

413 Planck Prinzip p.38<br />

414 Planck Prinzip Pp.7-9 e 13-17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!