25.07.2013 Views

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

different competing theories showed an agreement <strong>with</strong> some versions of PCE,<br />

mainly <strong>with</strong> the impossibility of perpetuum mobile. That is, they admitted a<br />

potential. Thus, strictly speaking, there was no longer any heuristic power in the<br />

PCE (still a global one in Helmholtz’s view). Either a more specific version of<br />

PCE or a more specific regulative principle was needed. The more specific<br />

version of PCE was to be connected <strong>with</strong> the localisation of energy of Poynting,<br />

but Helmholtz seems not to have understood its relevance, the more specific<br />

principle was in Helmholtz’s view PLA. Moreover the PLA version had to be in<br />

agreement <strong>with</strong> contiguous action: in fact a PLA related <strong>with</strong> Maxwell’s theory<br />

was Helmholtz’s starting point in 1886. At this stage the two shifts had been<br />

accomplished before Hertz’s experiments.<br />

In 1894 Helmholtz publishes a small volume entitled "Introduction to<br />

the Lectures on Theoretical Physics". The first two sections, Introduction <strong>and</strong><br />

Part I, are closely related to the themes discussed fourty years before in the<br />

Erhaltung <strong>and</strong> <strong>with</strong> them we will be concerned here. The third section, Part II, is<br />

very similar to the paper "An Epistemological Analysis of Counting <strong>and</strong><br />

Measurement".<br />

Introduction <strong>and</strong> Part I are of great relevance to focus some aspects of<br />

<strong>Helmholtz's</strong> methodological beliefs. Namely the conditions of possibility of<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing nature, the relations betwen force <strong>and</strong> law, the role of regulative<br />

principles in framing our scientific knowledge.<br />

What had been achieved: a turn of the century viewpoint<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> theory changed the shape of physics : after 1847 physical laws<br />

no longer had only to face the challenge of experimental results, but also had to<br />

be judged on more theoretical grounds, in their relation <strong>with</strong> the conservation<br />

principle. But in turn the principle had, from the beginning, different<br />

formulations.<br />

The growth of these formulations was joined <strong>with</strong> the growth of<br />

alternative research programs in the second half of the century. The energetist<br />

movement took off, <strong>with</strong> its attempts to overthrow the mechanical worldview,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!