25.07.2013 Views

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

But was important here is that despite the fact that, in the late seventies, no<br />

conclusive evidence existed for a specific theory, Helmholtz came gradually to<br />

consider dielectric theory as correct.<br />

"In the Faraday lecture of 1881 he predicted the decline of action-at-a-distance<br />

on the Continent <strong>and</strong> lent full support to Maxwell’s theory" 405.<br />

But he was still convinced, against Maxwell, that electricity consisted ultimately<br />

in discrete charges, "atoms of electricity". Thus the main element accepted from<br />

Maxwell was the role of the dielectric <strong>and</strong>, gradually, contiguous action.<br />

Helmholtz’s shift towards contiguous action <strong>and</strong>, in particular, the relation of the<br />

shift <strong>with</strong> the new version of PCE (Poynting's principle of local conservation)<br />

deserves detailed attention. Helmholtz’s views at the beginning of the eighties<br />

had already undergone some changes. His 1847 Newtonian model of central<br />

forces depending only on positions was changed in 1870 into a model of forces<br />

<strong>and</strong> torques. The theory of the dependence of forces on the positions was also<br />

lost, when Helmholtz accepted the general electrodynamic potential, a concept<br />

first introduced by F.Neumann, Weber <strong>and</strong> Clausius. In 1872 Helmholtz asserted<br />

the further condition on PCE, i.e. that the generalised kinetic energy of the<br />

electrical system (deriving partly from electrodynamic potential) must always be<br />

positive. Very few aspects of Helmholtz’s early conception remained at the<br />

beginning of the eighties. One of these was the distinction between kinetic <strong>and</strong><br />

potential energy. While shifting towards contiguous action, a conception that in<br />

the end would have denied this distinction, Helmholtz underwent a second,<br />

almost contemporary, shift: the Principle of Least Action was now to be<br />

considered the key to physical research, more than the Principle of <strong>Conservation</strong><br />

of <strong>Energy</strong>.<br />

Unification, again ( 1884-94)<br />

In a long paper of 1886, Helmholtz introduces a new unifying<br />

programme in physics, based on a heuristic principle different from energy<br />

conservation : the principle of least action (PLA). The principle of conservation<br />

of energy is ab<strong>and</strong>oned as the main guide in physics :<br />

"it in fact holds in a great variety of cases when least action does not.<br />

The latter is thus more specific".<br />

405 Turner, Steven. "Hermann von Helmholtz." In DSB 6 ,1973. Pp.241-53. P.252.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!