25.07.2013 Views

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

Conservation and Innovation : Helmholtz's Struggle with Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

point: as far as a potential exists, the corresponding force law does not contradict<br />

the impossibility of perpetual motion. Since this is the first root of the principle of<br />

conservation of vis viva analysed in section 3, it is to be asserted that Weber’s<br />

law originates directly from this root. This approach to PCE was often called the<br />

law of potential 394.<br />

Weber in 1871 proposed his own version of the principle of energy<br />

conservation 395. At the end of the second part of his 1871 paper Weber answers<br />

Helmholtz’s criticisms of 1870 about the incompatibility of Weber’s force law<br />

<strong>with</strong> some consequences of PCE. This was the starting point of the second part of<br />

the lengthy controversy. Weber first notes the new requirement Helmholtz<br />

imposes on PCE. The vis viva cannot become infinite, or otherwise an infinitely<br />

great amount of work could be performed (either in passing from a finite velocity<br />

to an infinite, or from an infinite to a finite). Thus a limiting velocity must exist.<br />

For Weber this limiting velocity is his constant cw=⎟2 vel.light. In Weber’s<br />

view, Helmholtz’s criticism has to be rejected for it assumes an initial velocity of<br />

the particles greater than c. Assuming this limiting value Weber’s potential is<br />

always a positive quantity. In the second place, Weber notes, the finite distance<br />

at which the particles in Helmholtz’s objection would acquire an infinite velocity<br />

is extremely small, outside the domain of enquiry. Thus the objection is<br />

practically meaningless. But Helmholtz again in 1872 <strong>and</strong> 1873 criticised<br />

Weber’s law because of the negative sign in one of the terms of the generalised<br />

potential. In fact this implies that a charge behaves "somewhat as if its mass were<br />

negative, so that in certain circumstances its velocity might increase indefinitely<br />

under the action of a force opposed to the motion" 396. Maxwell in 1873 agreed<br />

<strong>with</strong> Helmholtz’s 1872 criticisms <strong>and</strong> asserted that the latter "... impossible result<br />

is a necessary consequence of assuming any formula for the potential which<br />

introduces negative terms into the coefficient of v2" 397. Hoppe, an historian<br />

who defended Weber’s assumptions in two books, first in 1884 <strong>and</strong> then in 1927,<br />

asserts that in 1875 Weber succeeded in showing that <strong>with</strong> a proper<br />

reinterpretation of his equation for the vis viva, Helmholtz’s criticism can be<br />

394 Neumann Amp u Web p.337.<br />

395 Weber, Wilhelm. "Elektrodynamische Maassbestimmungen, insbesonder uuber das<br />

Prinzip der Erhaltung der Energie." 1871. In Werke 6 vols. Berlin, 1892-4. Vol.4. Pp. 247-99.<br />

Tr. in Phil Mag 43 (1872): 1-20 <strong>and</strong> 119-49.<br />

396 Whittaker Aether p.204.<br />

397 Maxwell Treatise par.854.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!