25.07.2013 Views

Experiments with Supersonic Beams as a Source of Cold Atoms

Experiments with Supersonic Beams as a Source of Cold Atoms

Experiments with Supersonic Beams as a Source of Cold Atoms

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

is the velocity, and ω is the angular velocity, dictates the design <strong>of</strong> the rotor, which<br />

must be strong enough at every point to support the force exerted by the section <strong>of</strong><br />

the rotor at larger radius. The force at each position can be approximated (<strong>as</strong>suming<br />

no transverse forces in the rotor) <strong>as</strong><br />

F =<br />

rmax<br />

ρA(r)ω 2 rdr, (3.5)<br />

where rmax<br />

rc<br />

is the maximum radius <strong>of</strong> the rotor, rc is position the force is being<br />

me<strong>as</strong>ured, ρ is the density <strong>of</strong> the rotor material, and A(r) is the cross sectional area<br />

<strong>of</strong> the rotor. The force at each position must be compared to the yield tensile strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> the rotor material times the cross sectional area. Equation 3.5 shows that a light<br />

and strong material is ideal for the rotor. While composites would be ideal, their<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> vacuum compatibility poses a serious problem. The chosen rotor material is<br />

grade 5 titanium, a high strength alloy which is also vacuum compatible. Another<br />

constraint on the rotor design is the vacuum itself, since the rotor must fit into a<br />

practical vacuum chamber. This led to a compromise design <strong>with</strong> a rotor radius <strong>of</strong><br />

50.4 cm at the center <strong>of</strong> the crystal.<br />

A CAD image <strong>of</strong> the rotor can be seen in figure 3.7. The overall length <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rotor is 101.5 cm. Since the inside <strong>of</strong> the rotor needs to be stronger than the tips,<br />

<strong>as</strong> seen in equation 3.5, the rotor is tapered linearly from a minimum thickness <strong>of</strong><br />

0.3175cm where the rotor joins the mirror holder, to a maximum thickness <strong>of</strong> 2.54cm,<br />

<strong>with</strong> the rotor a constant thickness over its center 5.08 cm. This taper reduces the<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s at large radius, reducing the force exerted, while placing material where it is<br />

needed near the center <strong>of</strong> the rotor. The crystal mirrors, which fit directly into the<br />

rotor are 5 mm in diameter and are held in place by an aluminum set screw, allowing<br />

for an exposed crystal diameter <strong>of</strong> 4 mm.<br />

While an analytical calculation <strong>of</strong> the forces placed on a the rotor is pro-<br />

hibitively complex, finite element analysis permits a numerical calculation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!