The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions - MISRC ...
The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions - MISRC ...
The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions - MISRC ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
previously introduced ICT innovations. <strong>The</strong> notion of a series of ICT innovations driving<br />
the digital divide is an important one, since there is no single focal ICT, but a series of<br />
focal ICTs, such as mainframes, PCs, the Internet, wireless technologies, etc., all of<br />
which have served as major drivers of ICT adoption <strong>and</strong> investment at different points in<br />
time. Indeed, there is the potential for diffusive interactions among clusters of ICT<br />
innovations available at the same point in time, such as complementarity between access<br />
to PCs <strong>and</strong> the Internet [see e.g., Ganley et al., 2005]. <strong>The</strong> ICT adoption cycle is<br />
recurring in the sense that the processes of access <strong>and</strong> use start anew, with the<br />
introduction of each new ICT innovation.<br />
As new ICT innovations become commercially available, individuals,<br />
organizations <strong>and</strong> countries adopt them at varying rates, leading to variations in the level<br />
of access. Among the adopters, there is variation in the ability to use the technology to<br />
obtain the comparative advantages the new technology provides. Accordingly, there are<br />
two Inequality Types, one in access to the technology <strong>and</strong> the other in the ability to use<br />
the technology, corresponding to the first order <strong>and</strong> second order digital divides,<br />
respectively, as shown in Figure 1. Indeed, as the majority of the participants in any<br />
social system have obtained access to a technology, the second order divide starts to<br />
become more important than the first order divide.<br />
<strong>The</strong> analysis of the first <strong>and</strong> second order effects of the digital divide can be<br />
conducted at three distinct Levels of Analysis, which are the individual, organizational<br />
<strong>and</strong> global levels. While there is an obvious aggregation effect going from one level of<br />
analysis to a higher level, there are unique questions of interest at each level of analysis.<br />
For example, at the individual level, one might ask how access <strong>and</strong>/or the ability to use<br />
technology varies among different segments of a social system, <strong>and</strong> what policies one<br />
could adopt to bridge the corresponding divides. At the organizational level, a natural<br />
question is how do factors such as size, geographical location, industry, <strong>and</strong> ownership<br />
status affect adoption <strong>and</strong> the ability to exploit technology in organizations. Finally, at<br />
the global level, pertinent questions include how countries differ in access <strong>and</strong> use of<br />
technology as a function of their wealth, education levels, infrastructure, <strong>and</strong> other socio-<br />
economic factors.<br />
5