The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions - MISRC ...
The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions - MISRC ...
The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions - MISRC ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
diversity of its workforce, Norris <strong>and</strong> Conceicao [2004] point out that those without<br />
online access are shut out of Internet-based training <strong>and</strong> education. <strong>The</strong>y note that the<br />
digital divide creates a gap in who is able to take advantage of online education<br />
opportunities, which then translates into fewer employment opportunities for the<br />
disconnected. Lindsay [2005] uses a case study of the efforts of the city of Glasgow to<br />
provide information about job opportunities to unemployed individuals through the<br />
Internet. <strong>The</strong> author argues that providing such information to this group of people via<br />
the Internet is problematic since many of these individuals will likely be those without<br />
access. <strong>The</strong>ir public policy recommendations are that public access to the Internet <strong>and</strong><br />
ICT training are needed to make the Internet an effective channel to deliver this<br />
information to the unemployed. In a related sociological study, Mossberger et al. [2003]<br />
conducted a telephone survey of 1,837 Americans in 2001 to examine whether people felt<br />
their job prospects were limited due to a lack of online access or computer skills.<br />
Economics provides another useful theoretical perspective when considering the<br />
impact of the digital divide on the workforce. <strong>Research</strong> using this perspective has<br />
examined the impact of computer usage in the workplace on changes in wages for white-<br />
collar workers. As more workplaces require IT skills, the digital divide may be<br />
perpetuated between those who are required to use technology on the job <strong>and</strong> those that<br />
don’t face such requirements. Using CPS data from 1984 to 1989, Krueger [1993] finds<br />
that workers who use computers at work earned 10% to 15% more than other workers, all<br />
else being held equal. DiNardo <strong>and</strong> Pischke [1997] replicate the findings of Krueger by<br />
studying the wage differentials of workers in Germany for a variety of white collar tools<br />
such as pencils, calculators <strong>and</strong> chairs. In that study, they take into account a variety of<br />
individual fixed effects that were not available to Krueger. <strong>The</strong>y conclude that white-<br />
collar workers who use computers possess unobserved skills, which might have little to<br />
do with computers, but which are rewarded in the labor market. Autor et al. [1998] also<br />
used CPS data <strong>and</strong> find that for both manufacturing <strong>and</strong> non-manufacturing sectors,<br />
increases in utilization of more-skilled workers are greater in the most computer-<br />
intensive industries. However, they stop short of claiming causality. Overall, these<br />
studies show that while IT skills are being required in more jobs, the direct impact on<br />
wages is unclear.<br />
13