24.07.2013 Views

The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions - MISRC ...

The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions - MISRC ...

The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions - MISRC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

diversity of its workforce, Norris <strong>and</strong> Conceicao [2004] point out that those without<br />

online access are shut out of Internet-based training <strong>and</strong> education. <strong>The</strong>y note that the<br />

digital divide creates a gap in who is able to take advantage of online education<br />

opportunities, which then translates into fewer employment opportunities for the<br />

disconnected. Lindsay [2005] uses a case study of the efforts of the city of Glasgow to<br />

provide information about job opportunities to unemployed individuals through the<br />

Internet. <strong>The</strong> author argues that providing such information to this group of people via<br />

the Internet is problematic since many of these individuals will likely be those without<br />

access. <strong>The</strong>ir public policy recommendations are that public access to the Internet <strong>and</strong><br />

ICT training are needed to make the Internet an effective channel to deliver this<br />

information to the unemployed. In a related sociological study, Mossberger et al. [2003]<br />

conducted a telephone survey of 1,837 Americans in 2001 to examine whether people felt<br />

their job prospects were limited due to a lack of online access or computer skills.<br />

Economics provides another useful theoretical perspective when considering the<br />

impact of the digital divide on the workforce. <strong>Research</strong> using this perspective has<br />

examined the impact of computer usage in the workplace on changes in wages for white-<br />

collar workers. As more workplaces require IT skills, the digital divide may be<br />

perpetuated between those who are required to use technology on the job <strong>and</strong> those that<br />

don’t face such requirements. Using CPS data from 1984 to 1989, Krueger [1993] finds<br />

that workers who use computers at work earned 10% to 15% more than other workers, all<br />

else being held equal. DiNardo <strong>and</strong> Pischke [1997] replicate the findings of Krueger by<br />

studying the wage differentials of workers in Germany for a variety of white collar tools<br />

such as pencils, calculators <strong>and</strong> chairs. In that study, they take into account a variety of<br />

individual fixed effects that were not available to Krueger. <strong>The</strong>y conclude that white-<br />

collar workers who use computers possess unobserved skills, which might have little to<br />

do with computers, but which are rewarded in the labor market. Autor et al. [1998] also<br />

used CPS data <strong>and</strong> find that for both manufacturing <strong>and</strong> non-manufacturing sectors,<br />

increases in utilization of more-skilled workers are greater in the most computer-<br />

intensive industries. However, they stop short of claiming causality. Overall, these<br />

studies show that while IT skills are being required in more jobs, the direct impact on<br />

wages is unclear.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!