24.07.2013 Views

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

0 <strong>LOWER</strong> <strong>CRETACEOUS</strong> <strong>DEPOSITS</strong> IN <strong>CALIFORNIA</strong>. <strong>AND</strong> <strong>OREGON</strong><br />

each, seem to be recorded in the atratigraphical sequence and in the faunas<br />

found in the Sacramento embayment, the results of which can be only<br />

briefly sketched here. One of these events was initiated at the beginning<br />

of Chico (late Albian) time; its second phase covered the subsidence that<br />

followed, during which the earliest deposits of this series began to accumulate.<br />

A second disturbance, differential in effects, was initiated in<br />

early Senonian (Coniacian) time, and this stage was followed by a longcontinued<br />

subsidence and the deposition of a sequence of Upper Cretaceous<br />

strata which was locally interrupted in middle Senonian time, This sequence<br />

of strata is of small arcal extent on the western bordar of the Sacramento<br />

embayment but is of greater spread on its eastern border and<br />

of still greater extent in the Joaquin embayment in which partly parallel<br />

events are recorded, but continued to a later epoch.<br />

In the Joaquin embayment, extending south from Mount Diablo,<br />

Lower Cretaceous deposits are known in a number of districts on the east<br />

flank of the Diablo Range (Mount Diablo, Quinto Creek, Waltham Creek,<br />

and Devils Den), but they are not continuous, and their areas are not<br />

large; neither do the strata attain in all places a constant thickness.<br />

Near Mount Diablo the thickness of the Lower Cretaceous does not<br />

exceed 5000 feet; near Quinto Creek it is much less; in the Devils Den<br />

district it may be 12,000 feet. Near Coalinga and in Waltham Creek<br />

Valley it is thought to attain to 15,000 feet, but this figure represents the<br />

maximum thickness in the Diablo Bange. One may suppose that the<br />

normal, or original, thickness of the Lower Cretaceous in the Joaquin<br />

embayment had been from 12,000 to 15,000 feet and explain the discrepancies<br />

in the sections in port by faulting and in part as a result of overlap<br />

of the Chico series upon the older groups of the Cretaceous succession.<br />

In the southern, as in the northern, embayment three diastrophic events<br />

are recorded in the upper Cretaceous sections. One is at the base of the<br />

Chico series; one is at the beginning of Senonian (Coniacian) time; and<br />

another is later, probably in Late Senonian time (late CampanJaa).<br />

The Cretaceous sections in the Joaquin embayment differ from those<br />

in the Sacramento embayment in the almost complete absence of Horsetown<br />

beds and in the much greater development of Upper Cretaceous,<br />

especially during the closing epochs of the period.<br />

In the southern coastal areas of California, including Lower California,<br />

and also in southwestern Oregon, scattered occurrences and incomplete<br />

data indicate that the major diastrophic and depositional events, at least,<br />

described in the preceding paragraphs were not wholly local but are<br />

traceable to the north and south far beyond the limits of the Great Valley<br />

trough and its embayments.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!