24.07.2013 Views

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CEBTACEOtTS BEDDJKNTABY DIVISIONS 85<br />

replaced by races with which they could not compete. Probably not all<br />

left fossil remains; some may have been shell-less. Evidences of battle<br />

are numerous and indicate that shelled forms (e.g., Ancylaceras and crioceratids)<br />

were vanquished, and their races disappeared soon after arrival.<br />

A critical epoch in the order of cephalopod life in the Great Valley<br />

trough was at tbe beginning of Horsetown time, as recorded in the faunas<br />

of the early Cottonwood beds and in the succession that followed. These<br />

successive faunas are dominated by types that are also dominant in nearly<br />

the same order in the Lower Cretaceous of southwestern Asia, as also in<br />

other regions.<br />

To what event in the geological history of the Pacific basin, or of tho<br />

world, could this abrupt change be attributed? Whatever the answer,<br />

it is clear that important immigrations into this trough followed a quite<br />

definite orogeny that seems to have affected in varying degrees the entire<br />

Pacific Coast from California to Alaska, and perhaps far beyond.<br />

Whether parallel facts could be recognized in Mexico and the Andean<br />

countries cannot now be stated.<br />

In some areas in Oregon, and apparently in California, Horsetown<br />

deposits did not immediately follow those of Paskenta time. This fact<br />

could be taken as evidence of local uplift and of withdrawal of the sea<br />

from such areas. That the sea was withdrawn from certain areas of the<br />

trough while still occupying others has already been shown. Far within<br />

the outer limits of its expansion during Paskenta time are found thick<br />

beds of conglomerate, marking roughly the strandlines of early Horsetown<br />

time, particularly in the Cottonwood drainage areas. In other areas no<br />

such conglomerates are found, and in some there are evidences of subsidence<br />

and of overlap of Horsetown deposits upon pre-Cretaceou$ formations.<br />

No lower Horsetown deposits have been reported from the Diablo<br />

Range south of Quinto Creek, nor farther to the south, although they may<br />

have been removed from many places or otherwise lost from view.<br />

Although lower Horsetown deposits are indicated by fossils on Queen<br />

Charlotte Islands, few have been reported from Alaskan areas, even where<br />

beds of Paskenta age are known.<br />

Without evidence to the contrary we may infer that the crustal disturbances<br />

that ended Paskenta time and resulted in the conditions described<br />

for the early Horsetown epoch in California were not local, although they<br />

produced local effects not everywhere alike. Such differential results<br />

have been described for some of the Andean countries and for Mexico<br />

and the Rocky Mountains and seem to have affected other regions.<br />

Burckhardt (1930) in describing these differential movements in Mexico,<br />

which correspond to the uplift that closed the Paskenta epoch in California,<br />

says in part:<br />

"In marked eemtraM with this expansion of the sea there is shown in northern<br />

Alcxica a regressive phase following Valanginian deposition."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!