24.07.2013 Views

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

84 <strong>LOWER</strong> <strong>CRETACEOUS</strong> <strong>DEPOSITS</strong> IN <strong>CALIFORNIA</strong>. <strong>AND</strong> <strong>OREGON</strong><br />

along the littoral zones westward icn these latitudes. Land animals would<br />

of course require some epochs of complete land connection for their migrations,<br />

but for marine animals it could be different. These may have<br />

followed either the northern or southern borders of a land bridge between<br />

the Asiatic and American continents. Whatever extensions of such land<br />

may have existed toward the north is not known, but one may suppose<br />

that a broad zone of land extended from Peru to Mexico, or even to southera<br />

California, forming an effective barrier far west of the present Isthmus,<br />

between the north Indo-Pacific and the Comanchean sea of Texas, Mexico,<br />

and the Northern Andes. This isthmian land would explain the faunal<br />

contrasts between the Shastan and Comanchean faunas already discussed,<br />

and at the same time suggests routes of molluscan migrations between<br />

opposite shores of the north Indo-Pacific ocean. Favorable currents<br />

traversing the northern littoral of such land bridges during early and<br />

middle Cretaceous times might bring the marine faunas of southwestern<br />

Asiatic regions and of intervening stations into the American West Coast<br />

embayments in which they are now found.<br />

Diverse Sources.—In accord with the foregoing views, it may be suggested<br />

that some elements in the early Cretaceous molluscan faunas of<br />

the Sacramento embayment (e.g., Berriasellids) may have had progenitors<br />

in the late Jurassic (Tithonian) stocks near at hand; other types (olcostephanids,<br />

neocomitids) now found mingled with AuceUa may have come<br />

into the embayment with them from northern European sources by way<br />

of Arctic America; others (Spiliceraa, hoplitids, and crioceratids) may hove<br />

come from southern or far western (Asiatic) sources by way of a south<br />

Pacific corridor.<br />

At the opening of Horsetown (Hauterivian) time a new order of life<br />

began in the Great Valley trough, partly as the result of immigrations<br />

from without, but in part from more local stocks. However, migrations<br />

continued to arrive at intervals until the close of Horsetown time. In<br />

the early part of this epoch generic types (Neocrcwpeditea, Lytoceras,<br />

and Hopiocrioaeras) arose partly from local stocks. At later epochs<br />

during Borremian time came Ancyloceras, Acrioceras, and Shaslicrioceras,<br />

followed in early Aptian time by new lytoceratids, Parahoplitoides, Nautilus,<br />

and forms of Acroleuthis. In early Gargaaian time came Awtraliccraw,<br />

Tropacum, ShasUtceras, HemibacuUtes, and new forms of PhylUxxras,<br />

soon followed by Parahoplitea, Ckefaniccros, and hamitids, and later by<br />

Acantheplites, Doutnlleiceras, Sonneralia, Cleoniceras, and Beudanticcra*.<br />

In brief, new assemblages continued to appear, bringing into the embayment<br />

at successive intervals lineages of cephalopoda not here before,<br />

although no doubt many were autochthonous. Meanwhile, many of the<br />

earlier stocks and their descendants disappeared. Almost all the inhabitants<br />

of Valanginian time had vanished before Barremian time or were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!