24.07.2013 Views

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CRETACEOUS</strong> SEDIMENTARY DIVISIONS 83<br />

Parahoplitidae are almost, if not entirely identical. Among the aneyloceratids<br />

may be mentioned Tropaeum and Au&iraHceras. Such analogous<br />

species are found also in the early Albian of the California embayments.<br />

These facts can be understood only on tbe assumption of suitable routes<br />

of exchange across the Pacific basin during early Cretaceous time, possibly<br />

beginning in the earliest epochs of the period, but at all events<br />

existing during later times.<br />

Such routes of travel should lie far to the south rather than to the north.<br />

The absence of most, if not all, of the older Horsetown ammonoids from<br />

Alaskan and Japanese Cretaceous deposits seems to harmonize with this<br />

view, although such evidence is somewhat negative and not conclusive.<br />

Many known facts concerning the Pacific basin and the terrestrial and<br />

marine faunas, past and present, upon its borders support tbe hypothesis<br />

of a land bridge across the south Pacific during late Mesozoic times. To<br />

what extent Burckbardt's (1900b) evidences of an ancient Pacific continent<br />

would support this hypothesis is not known. Gregory (1922) and<br />

others have supposed that direct communication between Atlantic and<br />

Pacific waters existed in the Panama region during later Cretaceous time,<br />

but convincing evidence of this has not been given. There is little in<br />

common, however, between the early Cretaceous faunas of the northern<br />

Andes and Mexico on the one hand, which are typically Mediterranean,<br />

and the contemporary California faunas, which are Indo-Pacific in character.<br />

This fact seems to be true also for the later Cretaceous faunas<br />

in these regions.<br />

The existence of a trans-Pacific land bridge in Mesozoic time has been<br />

suggested by various writers in the past, but the subject has been more<br />

recently revived and enriched by much new evidence that has been summarised<br />

by Gregory (1930) and others, supporting the assumption. The<br />

topic has also been recently discussed by Schuchert (1930) who seems to<br />

have been not entirely satisfied with the evidence offered by von Huene.<br />

The possibility of such a bridge, or bridges, has been given support by<br />

data supplied by Chubb (1934) who has studied the distribution and<br />

character of the continental rocks in the general areas of tho South Pacific<br />

and given his interpretation of the same.<br />

We may be justified in accepting the evidence and deductions of these<br />

writers and in believing that during early Cretaceous time land connections<br />

between southwestern Asia and western South America had existed,<br />

in effect at least, dividing the area of the present Pacific into two more or<br />

less equal parts. This bridge is thought to have extended across the<br />

Pacific, mainly south of the Equator, reaching South America in the latitudes<br />

of northern Chile and southern Peru. For the migration of some<br />

forms of Mollusca, including cephalopoda, complete land connection may<br />

not have been essential, if we assume the existence of ocean currents

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!