24.07.2013 Views

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

LOWER CRETACEOUS DEPOSITS CALIFORNIA AND OREGON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28 <strong>LOWER</strong> <strong>CRETACEOUS</strong> <strong>DEPOSITS</strong> INT <strong>CALIFORNIA</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>OREGON</strong><br />

In discussing the physiographic aspects of this region during Cretaceous<br />

time, Diller (1S93, p. 205-224) says, in part:<br />

"Near At hand, too, by the present streams, there are coaiao shore conglomcrateB,<br />

including gravels of the Cretaceoiu streams that flowed down from the Klamath<br />

Mountain* on the northwest into the ancient buy of the Sacramento Valley, and one<br />

ia surprised to find some evidence that the valleys of the ensbouching streams of<br />

early Cretaceous times are still occupied by streams."<br />

Although Diller did not indicate the location of these streams, many<br />

cany their own evidences of these facts. Their aggregate contributions of<br />

sediment to the western zone have not been great as compared to that<br />

coming from a single river system, but their historical significance is of<br />

great interest. As many as four such streams are to be seen within a<br />

distance of 20 miles to the west of Ono, Shasta County. Others may be<br />

seen farther south along the west border of the Sacramento Valley, some<br />

of them carrying at present a considerable volume of water.<br />

The vast volume of sediments outcropping on the west border of the<br />

Sacramento embayment should make it evident that it could not have<br />

been derived from local sources. In western Tehama County and southwestern<br />

Shasta County, north of Themes Creek, in an area into which<br />

no large streams now enter, the volume of Cretaceous sediment exceeds<br />

4900 cubic miles, without including that carried beyond the limits of this<br />

area during the time of deposition. This volume of material is obviously<br />

the work of a large river system draining a basin of proportionate dimensions,<br />

aa iB indicated also by the character of the sediments themselves<br />

and by other attendant circumstances. If this drainage area be assumed<br />

to have been 2800 square miles, it would require the removal of nearly<br />

1.8 vertical miles of surface materials from the whole of it to produce the<br />

sediment now found within the western zone north of Thomes Creek.<br />

The volume of sediment lost f rom this area by denudation since Cretaceous<br />

time is, of course, unknown, but this is not a part of the present problem.<br />

Tbe drainage of the present Trinity River system approximates 2800<br />

square miles. It is not necessary, of course, to assume that the volume<br />

of sediment computed for tbe area north of Thames Creek came exclusively<br />

from the basin of Trinity River. Under tbe physiographic conditions<br />

assumed for this region during Cretaceous time, one may suppose<br />

that the valley of the Klamath River and its many branches had been<br />

at tbat time tributary to the Trinity River, and thus the drainage area of<br />

the latter would have been about doubled.<br />

The drainage area of the lower Klamath River, west of the eastern<br />

outposts of Klamathonia, near Mount Shasta, covers about 2500 square<br />

miles. The combined area would accordingly approximate 5300 square<br />

miles, and the amount of denudation necessary to produce the sediments<br />

within the designated area would be correspondingly reduced, or fall<br />

within the limits of 5000 feet vertically. Denudation would not, of course,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!