24.07.2013 Views

Experiments to Control Atom Number and Phase-Space Density in ...

Experiments to Control Atom Number and Phase-Space Density in ...

Experiments to Control Atom Number and Phase-Space Density in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.3.2 Hyperf<strong>in</strong>e Structure<br />

So far the analysis has neglected the <strong>in</strong>teraction with the <strong>to</strong>tal angular momen-<br />

tum I of the nucleus. This <strong>in</strong>teraction is significantly smaller than the f<strong>in</strong>e structure<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction; however, it is still possible <strong>to</strong> observe the hyperf<strong>in</strong>e structure <strong>in</strong> many a<strong>to</strong>mic<br />

transitions, as for example <strong>in</strong> 87 Rb. For the case of 6 Li however, the hyperf<strong>in</strong>e structure<br />

can only be resolved <strong>in</strong> the ground state, not <strong>in</strong> the 2 2 P3/2 excited state, where the<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ewidth of the transition is larger than the hyperf<strong>in</strong>e splitt<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian describ<strong>in</strong>g the hyperf<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>teractions, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the magnetic<br />

dipole moment <strong>and</strong> the electric quadrupole moment of the nucleus, is given by [25]<br />

Hhfs = Ahfs I · 3(<br />

J +Bhfs<br />

I · J) 2 + 3<br />

2 ( I · J)−I(I +1)J(J +1)<br />

. (2.8)<br />

2I(2I −1)J(2J −1)<br />

Ahfs is the magnetic dipole constant, Bhfs is the electric quadrupole constant. Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

the <strong>to</strong>tal a<strong>to</strong>mic angular momentum F = I + J leads <strong>to</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g solution for the<br />

energy splitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

∆Ehfs = 1<br />

2 AhfsK +Bhfs<br />

3<br />

2<br />

K(K +1)−2I(I +1)J(J +1)<br />

, (2.9)<br />

4I(2I −1)J(2J −1)<br />

where K = F(F +1)−I(I +1)−J(J +1). The result<strong>in</strong>g energy structure is shown <strong>in</strong><br />

figures 2.4 <strong>and</strong> 2.5. The difference <strong>in</strong> the magnitude of the hyperf<strong>in</strong>e splitt<strong>in</strong>g, especially<br />

<strong>in</strong> the 2 P3/2 excited state, has large consequences for the experimental sequence <strong>and</strong><br />

absorption imag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> particular (see chapter 7.5.1).<br />

2.4 Branch<strong>in</strong>g Ratios<br />

Transitions between different energy levels are governed by electric dipole tran-<br />

sition rules. The relative probabilities for the different decay channels from the excited<br />

state are known as branch<strong>in</strong>g ratios. Traditional laser cool<strong>in</strong>g techniques, like the mag-<br />

ne<strong>to</strong> optical trap, see chapter 2.9, work best on a true two-level a<strong>to</strong>m, <strong>and</strong> any additional<br />

decay channels complicate the experimental setup, effectively limit<strong>in</strong>g the applicability<br />

<strong>to</strong> a small number of elements. For s<strong>in</strong>gle-pho<strong>to</strong>n cool<strong>in</strong>g on the other h<strong>and</strong>, hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at least three energy levels is essential. The branch<strong>in</strong>g ratios have a large effect on the<br />

efficiency of s<strong>in</strong>gle-pho<strong>to</strong>n cool<strong>in</strong>g, see chapters 3 <strong>and</strong> 5.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!