Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services
Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services
Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Strategies, Activities and Actions – Housing<br />
H5 – Alternative <strong>Options</strong><br />
Option Why is it not preferred?<br />
Future residential developments<br />
continue to provide larger housing<br />
at the higher end of the market,<br />
with Rochford District providing<br />
housing for the higher end of the<br />
market within the sub-region.<br />
Future developments seek to<br />
redress the balance of dwellings<br />
in the District by providing only<br />
smaller accommodation.<br />
The housing allocation for Rochford District is based on meeting the<br />
current and future needs of the local population, but the development to<br />
meet this need must be sustainable not just socially, but also<br />
environmentally. The environmental issues that will apply to new<br />
housing, in addition to other forms of development are set out in the<br />
Environmental Issues chapter of this <strong>document</strong>. Character is also<br />
important and is discussed in the Character of Place section.<br />
Lifetime Homes<br />
This option will be harmful to<br />
the District’s communities, as<br />
local people’s housing needs<br />
will not be met.<br />
This will create developments<br />
which will only cater for one<br />
section of the community.<br />
Such developments will not<br />
meet everyone’s needs or<br />
engender mixed communities.<br />
The ageing population of the District is an issue that is particularly<br />
pertinent to the subject of housing provision. It is important that housing<br />
is designed to be flexible to changes in people’s circumstances.<br />
Lifetime homes are homes designed for people to remain in for as much<br />
of their life as possible and to this end are adaptable to the differing<br />
needs of different stages of their life cycle. Building Regulations now<br />
require new dwellings to have access and facilities for disabled people<br />
and in being so designed they are expected to help people with reducing<br />
mobility to remain longer in their homes. The Lifetimes Homes Standards<br />
promoted by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation go further to provide<br />
housing that is more flexible and adaptable than that required by Part M<br />
of the Building Regulations and so are more suitable for older and<br />
disabled people.<br />
By requiring homes to meet the Lifetime Homes Standard we are not<br />
simply applying a “one size fits all” approach, or forcing all homes to be<br />
the same – the Lifetime Homes Standard is about ensuring homes can<br />
be easily adapted to meet changing needs, for example, by having<br />
staircases that are wide enough to accommodate a chairlift, or doorways<br />
wide enough for wheelchairs.<br />
35<br />
Rochford District<br />
contains an ageing<br />
population. The<br />
District has a higher<br />
proportion of older<br />
people than regional<br />
and national averages,<br />
and relatively fewer<br />
young people.<br />
The number of<br />
residents over 65 is<br />
expected to increase,<br />
whilst the numbers of<br />
those aged 0 to 19<br />
decreases and the<br />
population of the 20 to<br />
64 cohort remains<br />
relatively stable. In<br />
addition, the<br />
population of those<br />
aged over 85 in the<br />
District is projected to<br />
increase dramatically<br />
in future years.<br />
Requiring new housing<br />
to comply with the<br />
Lifetime Homes<br />
Standard will help<br />
support the ageing<br />
population of the<br />
District.