24.07.2013 Views

Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services

Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services

Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Strategies, Activities and Actions – Housing<br />

H5 – Alternative <strong>Options</strong><br />

Option Why is it not preferred?<br />

Future residential developments<br />

continue to provide larger housing<br />

at the higher end of the market,<br />

with Rochford District providing<br />

housing for the higher end of the<br />

market within the sub-region.<br />

Future developments seek to<br />

redress the balance of dwellings<br />

in the District by providing only<br />

smaller accommodation.<br />

The housing allocation for Rochford District is based on meeting the<br />

current and future needs of the local population, but the development to<br />

meet this need must be sustainable not just socially, but also<br />

environmentally. The environmental issues that will apply to new<br />

housing, in addition to other forms of development are set out in the<br />

Environmental Issues chapter of this <strong>document</strong>. Character is also<br />

important and is discussed in the Character of Place section.<br />

Lifetime Homes<br />

This option will be harmful to<br />

the District’s communities, as<br />

local people’s housing needs<br />

will not be met.<br />

This will create developments<br />

which will only cater for one<br />

section of the community.<br />

Such developments will not<br />

meet everyone’s needs or<br />

engender mixed communities.<br />

The ageing population of the District is an issue that is particularly<br />

pertinent to the subject of housing provision. It is important that housing<br />

is designed to be flexible to changes in people’s circumstances.<br />

Lifetime homes are homes designed for people to remain in for as much<br />

of their life as possible and to this end are adaptable to the differing<br />

needs of different stages of their life cycle. Building Regulations now<br />

require new dwellings to have access and facilities for disabled people<br />

and in being so designed they are expected to help people with reducing<br />

mobility to remain longer in their homes. The Lifetimes Homes Standards<br />

promoted by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation go further to provide<br />

housing that is more flexible and adaptable than that required by Part M<br />

of the Building Regulations and so are more suitable for older and<br />

disabled people.<br />

By requiring homes to meet the Lifetime Homes Standard we are not<br />

simply applying a “one size fits all” approach, or forcing all homes to be<br />

the same – the Lifetime Homes Standard is about ensuring homes can<br />

be easily adapted to meet changing needs, for example, by having<br />

staircases that are wide enough to accommodate a chairlift, or doorways<br />

wide enough for wheelchairs.<br />

35<br />

Rochford District<br />

contains an ageing<br />

population. The<br />

District has a higher<br />

proportion of older<br />

people than regional<br />

and national averages,<br />

and relatively fewer<br />

young people.<br />

The number of<br />

residents over 65 is<br />

expected to increase,<br />

whilst the numbers of<br />

those aged 0 to 19<br />

decreases and the<br />

population of the 20 to<br />

64 cohort remains<br />

relatively stable. In<br />

addition, the<br />

population of those<br />

aged over 85 in the<br />

District is projected to<br />

increase dramatically<br />

in future years.<br />

Requiring new housing<br />

to comply with the<br />

Lifetime Homes<br />

Standard will help<br />

support the ageing<br />

population of the<br />

District.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!