24.07.2013 Views

Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services

Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services

Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Strategies, Activities and Actions – Housing<br />

H4 Affordable Housing – <strong>Preferred</strong> Option<br />

At least 35% of dwellings on all developments of 15 or more units, or<br />

on sites greater than 0.5 hectares, shall be affordable. These<br />

affordable dwellings shall be spread (“pepper potted”) throughout<br />

larger developments. Affordable dwellings shall be required to remain<br />

affordable in perpetuity - this will be secured through legal<br />

agreements.<br />

This requirement will only be relaxed in highly exceptional<br />

circumstances, for example where constraints make on-site provision<br />

impossible or where the developer is able to definitely demonstrate<br />

that 35% provision will be economically unviable, rendering the site<br />

undeliverable. In such cases we will negotiate the proportion of<br />

affordable dwellings based on the economic viability calculations. It is<br />

expected that affordable housing will be provided on each<br />

development site; in rare cases, taking account of particular site<br />

characteristics, the affordable housing contribution may be provided<br />

by way of a commuted sum towards off-site affordable housing.<br />

H4 – Alternative <strong>Options</strong><br />

Option Why is it not preferred?<br />

Higher percentage, with a<br />

higher threshold to ensure<br />

that overall provision<br />

remains approximately<br />

35%.<br />

No threshold – 35% of all<br />

residential developments<br />

must be affordable<br />

dwellings.<br />

The need for affordable<br />

housing is so great in<br />

Rochford District that the<br />

percentage developers are<br />

required to provide should<br />

be greater.<br />

Different affordable housing<br />

percentages applied to<br />

different areas throughout<br />

the District, particularly to<br />

rural settlements, to reflect<br />

demand.<br />

This would lead to an uncertain<br />

provision of affordable housing. In<br />

addition, it may prove overly<br />

onerous on developers of large sites<br />

making development undeliverable,<br />

leading to a shortfall in housing.<br />

This would place an unfair burden<br />

on small developments and may<br />

discourage intensification in<br />

appropriate places.<br />

Although there is a significant need<br />

for affordable housing in the District,<br />

if the requirement is set at greater<br />

than 35% development may become<br />

undeliverable, leading to a shortfall<br />

in housing provision. In addition,<br />

this approach would be detrimental<br />

to creating mixed communities.<br />

This approach would make<br />

development less viable in certain<br />

areas, possibly leading to uneven<br />

development across the District and<br />

an overall shortfall of housing.<br />

33<br />

Providing a mix of<br />

housing within all new<br />

developments will<br />

comply with the<br />

Sustainable<br />

Community <strong>Strategy</strong>.<br />

Providing a mix of<br />

housing within new<br />

developments aims to<br />

encourage equal<br />

opportunities within<br />

communities.<br />

Well designed<br />

developments can<br />

foster greater<br />

community cohesion<br />

through designing out<br />

crime and anti-social<br />

behaviour.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!