Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services

Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services Core Strategy Preferred Options document - Amazon Web Services

fs.drupal.rochford.s3.amazonaws.com
from fs.drupal.rochford.s3.amazonaws.com More from this publisher
24.07.2013 Views

Strategies, Activities and Actions – Housing The average household size in Rochford District is greater than the national average. This is particularly the case in the western part of the District. The District experiences relatively modest levels of inmigration, primarily into Foulness and Great Wakering Ward and areas along the border with Basildon. Local services must be accessible from new developments to make them sustainable, and to facilitate achievement of the objective ‘increasing accessibility to services’ as outlined in the Sustainable Community Strategy. H2 – Alternative Options (continued) Option Why is it not preferred? East Rochford as alternative to other Rochford locations North Ashingdon as alternative to other Ashingdon locations North East Hockley as alternative to other Hockley / Hawkwell locations Greater quantum of development in Rochford, less in Ashingdon Alternative timing of development as outlined. General locations post-2021 We are required to ensure there is an adequate 15-year housing supply. As such, it is necessary for the Core Strategy to consider appropriate areas for development between 2021 and 2025. In considering the general development locations for post 2021 development, we have had regard to the same issues as in H2 above but 30 It is considered that west Rochford is a more suitable location given its proximity to the train station, town centre and its relationship with area of significant employment growth potential at London Southend Airport and its environs. Traffic flows from new development to the east of Rochford would be predominantly be through the centre of the town centre resulting in significant congestion. North of Ashingdon is located away from services and facilities, and, as such, is not considered as sustainable a location for residential development as other areas. Whilst in relative proximity to the town centre and train station, the impact on the highway network from traffic heading through Hockley, or out of Hockley and subsequently along Ashingdon Road, is considered to render the location unviable. Development to the south of Hawkwell is considered better placed in relation to the highway network and the proposed employment growth around London Southend Airport. We believe there are opportunities for development to go ahead in Ashingdon that would bring wider community benefits, particularly in relation to King Edmund School. The proposed timing of development is based on the need to ensure adequate infrastructure, employment and other services, as outlined in other sections of the Core Strategy, are in place in a timely manner relative to residential development.

Strategies, Activities and Actions – Housing have included areas which may not be immediately deliverable, or where the situation vis-à-vis infrastructure and the impact on existing communities is such that their delivery earlier would not be appropriate. The figures, with an annual average of 250 units, meet the East of England Plan’s minimum in the period 2021-2025 and do not make allowance for any contribution through windfall. The figures are approximates at this stage. The exact figures will need to be determined through the Allocations Development Plan Document process or, where appropriate, Area Action Plans at a later date. Sites for post-2021 development will not be delineated within the next Allocations Development Plan Document, but will be examined in a future review. As with the pre-2021 development areas, it is important to note that development coming forward within the areas outlined in H3 will have to conform to the other policies within the Core Strategy. H3 General Locations Post-2021 – Preferred Option Post-2021, we will extend the residential envelope of existing settlements for the purposes of residential development in the following areas (as indicated on the Key Diagram) to deliver the following approximate number of units post-2021. Prior to this time, Green Belt land within such areas will be safeguarded with the exception of release as per H2. Area No. of units post-2021 West Rochford 150 South Hawkwell 130 South East Ashingdon 380 South West Hullbridge 90 South West Great 160 Wakering South Canewdon 90 Total 1000 The detailed location and development will be articulated within the Allocations Development Plan Document and, where appropriate, Area Action Plans. Development within the above areas will be required to be comprehensively planned. A range of other uses and infrastructure (including off-site infrastructure), having regard to the requirements of the Core Strategy, will be required to be developed and implemented in a timely manner alongside housing. Appendix H1 outlines the infrastructure that will be required for each residential area, and should be read in conjunction with Preferred Option CLT1. We will maintain a flexible approach with regards to the timing of the release of land for residential development to ensure a constant fiveyear supply of land. 31 Affordable housing does not mean housing that is of inferior quality. When we talk about affordable housing, we mean housing that the District’s residents (e.g. young couples, key workers) can either buy or rent for less money than it would cost on the open market. There is an acute shortage of affordable housing in Rochford District. Recent studies carried out as part of a Strategic Housing Market Assessment for the sub-region indicate that as much as half of the housing Rochford District is required to develop would have to be affordable housing to meet need.

Strategies, Activities and Actions – Housing<br />

The average<br />

household size in<br />

Rochford District is<br />

greater than the<br />

national average. This<br />

is particularly the case<br />

in the western part of<br />

the District.<br />

The District<br />

experiences relatively<br />

modest levels of inmigration,<br />

primarily<br />

into Foulness and<br />

Great Wakering Ward<br />

and areas along the<br />

border with Basildon.<br />

Local services must be<br />

accessible from new<br />

developments to make<br />

them sustainable, and<br />

to facilitate<br />

achievement of the<br />

objective ‘increasing<br />

accessibility to<br />

services’ as outlined in<br />

the Sustainable<br />

Community <strong>Strategy</strong>.<br />

H2 – Alternative <strong>Options</strong> (continued)<br />

Option Why is it not preferred?<br />

East Rochford as<br />

alternative to other<br />

Rochford locations<br />

North Ashingdon as<br />

alternative to other<br />

Ashingdon locations<br />

North East Hockley as<br />

alternative to other<br />

Hockley / Hawkwell<br />

locations<br />

Greater quantum of<br />

development in<br />

Rochford, less in<br />

Ashingdon<br />

Alternative timing of<br />

development as<br />

outlined.<br />

General locations post-2021<br />

We are required to ensure there is an adequate 15-year housing supply.<br />

As such, it is necessary for the <strong>Core</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> to consider appropriate<br />

areas for development between 2021 and 2025.<br />

In considering the general development locations for post 2021<br />

development, we have had regard to the same issues as in H2 above but<br />

30<br />

It is considered that west Rochford is a<br />

more suitable location given its proximity to<br />

the train station, town centre and its<br />

relationship with area of significant<br />

employment growth potential at London<br />

Southend Airport and its environs. Traffic<br />

flows from new development to the east of<br />

Rochford would be predominantly be<br />

through the centre of the town centre<br />

resulting in significant congestion.<br />

North of Ashingdon is located away from<br />

services and facilities, and, as such, is not<br />

considered as sustainable a location for<br />

residential development as other areas.<br />

Whilst in relative proximity to the town<br />

centre and train station, the impact on the<br />

highway network from traffic heading<br />

through Hockley, or out of Hockley and<br />

subsequently along Ashingdon Road, is<br />

considered to render the location unviable.<br />

Development to the south of Hawkwell is<br />

considered better placed in relation to the<br />

highway network and the proposed<br />

employment growth around London<br />

Southend Airport.<br />

We believe there are opportunities for<br />

development to go ahead in Ashingdon that<br />

would bring wider community benefits,<br />

particularly in relation to King Edmund<br />

School.<br />

The proposed timing of development is<br />

based on the need to ensure adequate<br />

infrastructure, employment and other<br />

services, as outlined in other sections of<br />

the <strong>Core</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong>, are in place in a timely<br />

manner relative to residential development.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!