23.07.2013 Views

Feeding Systems with Legumes to Intensify Dairy Farms - cgiar

Feeding Systems with Legumes to Intensify Dairy Farms - cgiar

Feeding Systems with Legumes to Intensify Dairy Farms - cgiar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In Vivo Studies on the Complementarity between<br />

Forage Basal Diets and Legume Supplements<br />

Wilson Quiñonez, Patricia Avila, and Carlos Lascano<br />

CIAT, Colombia<br />

Previous results from confined feeding trials suggested that when<br />

supplementing available forage sources on the farm <strong>to</strong> overcome nutrient<br />

deficiencies in ruminants, it is important <strong>to</strong> synchronize feeding of the<br />

higher quality forage supplement <strong>with</strong> the basal forage so that energy and<br />

protein are available concurrently. Also, synergism among forages may vary<br />

not only <strong>with</strong> the types of forages fed but also <strong>with</strong> how they are fed (for<br />

example, amount and frequency).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Eight African type wethers (24 kg LW, on average) were fed a low-quality<br />

basal grass diet, and were randomly allocated <strong>to</strong> four supplementation<br />

treatments, arranged in a 4 x 4 Latin square design, consisting of sugarcane<br />

(60%) mixed <strong>with</strong> Cratylia argentea (40%). Treatments were as follows: T1,<br />

low level of supplementation (0.5% LW) fed once a day (a.m.); T2, high level<br />

of supplementation (1.0% LW) fed once a day (a.m.); T3, low level of<br />

supplementation (0.5% LW) fed twice a day (a.m.+ p.m.); and T4, high level<br />

of supplementation (1% LW) fed twice a day (a.m. + p.m.). Measurements<br />

included quality of the basal diet, intake of supplements offered,<br />

digestibility, and N balance.<br />

Results<br />

The low-quality basal grass diet was low in CP (4.8%) and high in cell<br />

wall content (79% NDF and 44% ADF). On the other hand, chopped<br />

sugarcane, fed as an energy supplement, was low in CP (3.1%) but had low<br />

cell wall content (39% NDF and 24% ADF). The legume (Cratylia leaves) fed<br />

had high CP (21%) and high cell wall contents (67% NDF and 37% ADF).<br />

Thus the supplement fed was high in energy and medium in protein (10%<br />

dry basis). Intake of the basal diet did not differ among treatments, but<br />

there were differences in supplement intake due <strong>to</strong> treatments. As expected,<br />

intake of sugarcane and Cratylia tended <strong>to</strong> be higher when fed at the highest<br />

level. However, it is interesting <strong>to</strong> note that when supplements were offered<br />

at the high level, intake of sugarcane and Cratylia increased <strong>with</strong> twice-aday<br />

feeding compared <strong>with</strong> once-a-day feeding (Table 1).<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!