23.07.2013 Views

Soft Tissue Visualization Using a Highly Efficient Megavoltage Cone ...

Soft Tissue Visualization Using a Highly Efficient Megavoltage Cone ...

Soft Tissue Visualization Using a Highly Efficient Megavoltage Cone ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Two image receptors that were used for this study contained two components; a metal build up<br />

plate/phosphor screen and a flat panel imager. The flat panel imager had an active area of 41 x 41 cm 2 , and<br />

contained 1024 x1024 elements of 0.4 mm pitch. The fastest frame rate was 7 frames per second and the<br />

output data was 16-bit. Flat panel detectors generate frames either using “Free Running” or “External<br />

Triggered”. Free running means that the detector sends out continuous frames according to the selected<br />

frame time. External triggered means that there is an external trigger which allows the generation of the<br />

maskable interrupt request.<br />

The phosphor screen of one receptor (receptor 1) was a 133 mg/cm 2 Gd 2O 2S screen (Lanex Fast) and for<br />

the receptor 2 was an 800 µm CsI (TI) scintillator screen. Both receptors were using a 1mm copper buildup<br />

plate. The charge amplifier capacitance of receptors 1 and 2 were 5pF and 1pF, respectively.<br />

2.3 <strong>Cone</strong> Beam Image Acquisitions and Corrections<br />

<strong>Cone</strong> beam CT starts by acquiring a large number of projection images acquired as the X-ray source<br />

follows an orbital path. At every angular increment, i.e., every degree, an image is acquired. 201<br />

projections were acquired over 201 degrees (1° rotation between projections) around the subject. The<br />

gantry speed was set to 109° per minute.<br />

The Siemens PRIMUS® linear accelerator parameters were adjusted to allow the delivery of a small<br />

fraction of a Monitor Unit (MU) per image. A very precise dose control was achieved by loading the<br />

accelerator by very small amount of electrons per pulse. In the current design, the injection is phased with<br />

the RF power at startup or during re-phasing of the injector at the programmed angular increment. With<br />

normal beam parameters, the phasing or re-phasing of the injection generates a shift in the resonant<br />

frequency of the accelerator. Because of the lag of the automatic frequency control (AFC), the beam<br />

formation can be significant (hundreds of milliseconds). In order to improve the beam formation, the beam<br />

parameters were adjusted such that the dose per pulse was reduced to approximately 10% of normal, and<br />

the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) was adjusted to 250 pps. The reduced loading resulted in an<br />

insignificant shift in the resonant frequency of the accelerator, resulting in significant improvement of the<br />

beam formation (less than a few ms). The increased PRF improved the granularity of the control system,<br />

the significance of every dose pulse was reduced, the predictability of the system increased, and the beam<br />

formation time decreased to only several milliseconds.<br />

Three corrections were performed; Offset, Gain, and Defected pixel correction. Offset correction is used to<br />

correct the dark current of each pixel for a specified frame or integration time. The integration time for each<br />

projection is equal to the projection period (figure-1), and therefore, the Offset correction images were<br />

acquired with the frame time that is equal to the projection period.<br />

The Gain correction is used to homogenize the flat field image intensity. The Defected pixel correction<br />

allows a software repair of defected pixels to enhance image quality. Improper pixel values are replaced<br />

with the averaged value of the adjacent pixels, while defected pixels are not averaged.<br />

2.4 Preprocessing by Resolution/Dose Adaptive Filter<br />

A unique adaptive noise removal filter was used for image enhancement 2 . The filter utilizes pixel-wise<br />

nonlinear and adaptive techniques to estimate the additive noise power before filtering. The characteristics<br />

of the filter are adapted to the input X-ray flux and image spatial resolution. Filtering is minimal to the<br />

images that receives high X-ray flux, and increases with the decreasing flux. To minimize the loss of<br />

resolution, minimum filtering is applied to the area of an image with large variance to preserve the edges<br />

and other high frequency components of an image 2 .<br />

Before data normalization and reconstruction, the corrected projection images (Offset, Gain, and Defected<br />

pixel) were processed by the resolution/dose adaptive filter using a local matrix size of 8x8.<br />

2.5 Data Normalization and Reconstruction

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!