Download (1660Kb) - OAR@ICRISAT

viii. Employment generated
due to implementation of
project
ix. Change in household
category, total & source
x. Freedom from Debt and
reduction in degree of
dependence of money
lenders (case studies)
xi. Reduction in outmigration
(case studies)
xii. Reduction in drought
vulnerability of the
watershed
xiii. Detailed case studies of
specific farmers impacted
by the project
xiv. Photographs showing
work + its impact
Employment generated only during the implementation of
watershed development works, but no improvement later.
Long-term labor migration continues, but reduced by 50%.
However, NREGS helped reduced labor migration
7. Learnings and process documentation (how the program could be implemented better;
constraints, improvements possible, changes made etc.)
8. Observations and Comments by Evaluators:
♦ Padmavathi SHG which has 15 members actively functioning and members grow
vegetables and doing vegetable business.
♦ Location of the structure is fair considering technical aspects appropriately.
♦ Constructions quality is poor and after maintenance is negligible. Beneficiaries felt
that the scheme should be implemented thru responsible organizations or officials.
♦ All structures were damaged due to poor construction.
♦ Watershed committee misused the funds and executed poor quality works. All
structures are damaged in the same year as foundation and quality of construction
was very poor
♦ They have grabbed even office furniture and became defunct.
♦ Already brought to the notice of officials and villagers complain that no action was
taken on watershed committee.
61