23.07.2013 Views

(2009): Lichens in Scandinavia known mainly from Norwegian type ...

(2009): Lichens in Scandinavia known mainly from Norwegian type ...

(2009): Lichens in Scandinavia known mainly from Norwegian type ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15 Per Magnus Jørgensen & Anders Nord<strong>in</strong> GRAPHIS SCRIPTA 21 (<strong>2009</strong>)<br />

(only the clearly different Japanese T. pacifica<br />

Harada is <strong>known</strong> to us), though the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

label does not clearly <strong>in</strong>dicate that it grew on<br />

the shore, only by the fjord. However, the<br />

accompany<strong>in</strong>g species <strong>in</strong>dicates a seepage rock<br />

<strong>in</strong> the aerohal<strong>in</strong>e zone. It has not been<br />

recollected <strong>in</strong> the <strong>type</strong> locality recently, which<br />

is urgently needed as it may prove to be an<br />

unusual, specialized species <strong>in</strong> its genus.<br />

Thelidium sordidum Th.Fr.<br />

Type: Norway, F<strong>in</strong>nmark, Varanger, Aldsok,<br />

1868, Th. M. Fries (UPS!, holo<strong>type</strong>, Fig. 14).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Orange, who revised the <strong>type</strong><br />

specimen, this is probably an overmature<br />

specimen of a Verrucaria species of the V.<br />

murorum group, normally with simple spores.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce V. murorum is much more southern <strong>in</strong><br />

Scand<strong>in</strong>avia the identity of the <strong>type</strong> specimen<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s obscure.<br />

Thelidium xyloderma Norman<br />

Type: Norway, Opland, Land, Aavella, 1880,<br />

J. M. Norman (S!, holo<strong>type</strong>).<br />

The <strong>type</strong> is a non-lichenized fungus grow<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

lignum covered by an algal sheet. This is<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>gly no lichen.<br />

Thrombium ebeneum Norman<br />

Type: Norway, Vestfold, Larvik, Jordfalden,<br />

1882, J. M. Norman (UPS!, holo<strong>type</strong>?).<br />

This species was established by Norman (1884)<br />

on the basis of its blackish green pigmentation<br />

of the fruitbody wall and the 4-spored asci<br />

(also observed by us), which separates it <strong>from</strong><br />

T. epigaeum, a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

characters which normally would <strong>in</strong>dicate an<br />

autonomous species. S<strong>in</strong>ce it, however, has not<br />

been collected anywhere else, this establishes<br />

doubt as to whether it was an accidental<br />

variation of that species. The matter can only<br />

be conclusively solved when more material is<br />

discovered, so a search <strong>in</strong> the region is urgently<br />

required. There ought to be another specimen<br />

Figure 14. Thelidium sordidum, draw<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

A. Orange attatched to the <strong>type</strong> specimen.<br />

<strong>in</strong> a <strong>Norwegian</strong> herbarium, so we are uncerta<strong>in</strong><br />

about the status of the one found <strong>in</strong> UPS, where<br />

Norman usually did not place his <strong>type</strong>s.<br />

Verrucaria atlantica (H.Magn.)<br />

Type: Norway, Rogaland, Randaberg, 1939,<br />

A. H. Magnusson 16858 (UPS!, iso<strong>type</strong> for<br />

Dermatocarpon atlanticum H.Magn., Fig. 15).<br />

This <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g species has had a chequered<br />

nomenclatural history. When describ<strong>in</strong>g it<br />

Magnusson (1949) was obviously unaware of<br />

the older Dermatocarpon atlanticum Werner.<br />

Werner (1951) then <strong>in</strong>troduced a new name,<br />

Dermatocarpon magnussonii. Unaware of that,<br />

Magnusson (1952) presented another substitute,<br />

Dermatocarpon litorale. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

<strong>in</strong>to Verrucaria (Santesson et al.<br />

2004) was fortunately not formally made. As<br />

seen above, the basionym is illegitimate and<br />

the species appears not to belong <strong>in</strong> Verrucaria<br />

s.str., as understood by Gueidan et al. (2007).<br />

As po<strong>in</strong>ted out by Breuss (1990), it is closest<br />

related to ‘Dermatocarpon’ norrlandicum<br />

H.Magn., a rare and poorly understood species<br />

only <strong>known</strong> <strong>from</strong> its <strong>type</strong> specimen <strong>from</strong><br />

Lycksele Lappmark, Sweden. A third species<br />

<strong>in</strong> this group <strong>in</strong> our region, Dermatocarpon<br />

nuoljae H.Magn., is also only <strong>known</strong> <strong>from</strong> its<br />

<strong>type</strong> (<strong>from</strong> Torne Lappmark). The whole group<br />

is <strong>in</strong> urgent need of recollection and study, as it<br />

is difficult to evaluate the taxonomy based on<br />

these three specimens, and the material is too<br />

old for molecular studies. V. atlantica, though,<br />

appears to be rather distantly related to the two

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!