23.07.2013 Views

The Kaipara Konnection - Kaipara Konnection - Dargaville.BIZ

The Kaipara Konnection - Kaipara Konnection - Dargaville.BIZ

The Kaipara Konnection - Kaipara Konnection - Dargaville.BIZ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A terrorist is someone who has a bomb<br />

but can’t afford an air force. --William Blum<br />

An Observation from Aardvark<br />

Free water, pay here<br />

<strong>The</strong> Prime Minister has told us that water is not “owned” by<br />

anyone -- it is owned by everyone. This will undoubtedly come as<br />

very good news for those who are forced (by threat of harsh legal<br />

penalty) to pay for the water-rights they need to irrigate their<br />

land or whatever. I guess that if the PM is true to his word, local<br />

authorities and environmental bodies will now be powerless to<br />

charge anyone for this resource.<br />

Cue Tui’s ad.<br />

I suspect that the PM really means “water is not owned by Maori,<br />

it’s owned by the government of the day”.<br />

That is very different to what he’s been saying and I see the magic of political spin being used to its fullest extent here.<br />

Would it be right to grant Maori “ownership” of the water under the provisions of <strong>The</strong> Treaty? Well perhaps they ought to<br />

own the water that was in our lakes and rivers at the moment <strong>The</strong> Treaty was signed - but I suspect that water has long<br />

since evaporated or flowed out to sea. If Maori can find and identify that water, they’re welcome to it. However, since the<br />

contents of our lakes and rivers are constantly renewed, I would argue, like the PM, that *everyone* owns the fluid that<br />

now fills those waterways.<br />

Which raises the issue of whether the government (central or local) has any right to charge for the use of a resource<br />

that we already own. Whether it’s a water-right for power generation or a water-right for irrigation, an admission by the<br />

government that “water should not be owned” indicates that there can not be any charge for its use. Yes, if you live in a<br />

town where there is reticulated water then the company which provides that *service* is entitled to charge you for your<br />

connection -- but they ought not be able to charge you by the litre -- since that’s charging for something the PM says<br />

“should not be owned” and, if you don’t own something, how can you sell it - that’s fraud.<br />

I’m a little torn over this whole issue -- on the one hand, I’m tempted to support any initiative that will halt the partial sale<br />

of state-owned assets in the way that the government is planning. On the other hand however, I don’t think that Maori<br />

can sensibly claim ownership of something that has long-since left the building.<br />

And remember -- if government is prepared to be so hypocritical as to sell something that it admits ought not be owned<br />

by anyone - how long before it decides to sell our water to offshore ownership in a poorly planned attempt to balance the<br />

books.<br />

We’re constantly being told by futurists that water will soon become the most precious commodity in the world. How long<br />

before we’re buying *our* water back from the Chinese, USA or other “owner” I wonder?<br />

I have to admit I’m getting seriously pissed off at the antics and stupidity of our politicians.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ink Spot<br />

Phone: 0800 INK SPOT E-Mail: darginkspot@slingshot.co.nz<br />

http://inkspot.nscoc.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!