23.07.2013 Views

NYT-1201: STATE OF THE ART A Thermostat That's Clever, Not ...

NYT-1201: STATE OF THE ART A Thermostat That's Clever, Not ...

NYT-1201: STATE OF THE ART A Thermostat That's Clever, Not ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

apacity for applying it to concrete problems. In<br />

reality, no one has theoretical expertise in more<br />

than a few specialized subjects, and there is no s<br />

trong correlation between having such knowledge an<br />

d being able to use it to resolve complex social a<br />

nd political problems. Even more important, our t<br />

heoretical knowledge is often highly limited, so t<br />

hat even the best available expert advice may be o<br />

f little practical value. An experienced and info<br />

rmed non-expert may well have a better sense of th<br />

ese limits than experts strongly invested in their<br />

disciplines. This analysis supports the traditio<br />

nal American distrust of intellectuals: they are n<br />

ot in general highly suited for political office.<br />

But it does not support the anti-intellectualism t<br />

hat tolerates or even applauds candidates who disd<br />

ain or are incapable of serious engagement with in<br />

tellectuals. Good politicians need not be intell<br />

ectuals, but they should have intellectual lives.<br />

Concretely, they should have an ability and inter<br />

est in reading the sorts of articles that appear i<br />

n, for example, Scientific American, The New York<br />

Review of Books, and the science, culture and op-e<br />

d sections of major national newspapers — as well<br />

as the books discussed in such articles.<br />

It’s often said that what our leaders need is comm<br />

on sense, not fancy theories. But common-sense id<br />

eas that work in individuals’ everyday lives are o<br />

ften useless for dealing with complex problems of<br />

society as a whole. For example, it’s common sens<br />

e that government payments to the unemployed will<br />

lead to more jobs because those receiving the paym<br />

ents will spend the money, thereby increasing dema<br />

nd, which will lead businesses to hire more worker<br />

s. But it’s also common sense that if people are<br />

paid for not working, they will have less incentiv<br />

e to work, which will increase unemployment. The<br />

trick is to find the amount of unemployment benefi<br />

ts that will strike the most effective balance bet<br />

ween stimulating demand and discouraging employmen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!