23.07.2013 Views

NYT-1201: STATE OF THE ART A Thermostat That's Clever, Not ...

NYT-1201: STATE OF THE ART A Thermostat That's Clever, Not ...

NYT-1201: STATE OF THE ART A Thermostat That's Clever, Not ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

computer that can play “Jeopardy!” and beat two h<br />

uman champions earlier this year. I.B.M.’s clever<br />

machine consumes 85,000 watts of electricity, whil<br />

e the human brain runs on just 20 watts. “Evolutio<br />

n figured this out,” Dr. Kelly said.<br />

Several biologically inspired paths are being expl<br />

ored by computer scientists in universities and co<br />

rporate laboratories worldwide. But researchers fr<br />

om I.B.M. and four universities — Cornell, Columbi<br />

a, the University of Wisconsin, and the University<br />

of California, Merced — are engaged in a project<br />

that seems particularly intriguing.<br />

The project, a collaboration of computer scientist<br />

s and neuroscientists begun three years ago, has b<br />

een encouraging enough that in August it won a $21<br />

million round of government financing from the De<br />

fense Advanced Research Projects Agency, bringing<br />

the total to $41 million in three rounds. In recen<br />

t months, the team has developed prototype “neuros<br />

ynaptic” microprocessors, or chips that operate mo<br />

re like neurons and synapses than like conventiona<br />

l semiconductors.<br />

But since 2008, the project itself has evolved, be<br />

coming more focused, if not scaled back. Its exper<br />

ience suggests what designs, concepts and techniqu<br />

es might be usefully borrowed from biology to push<br />

the boundaries of computing, and what cannot be a<br />

pplied, or even understood.<br />

At the outset, Dharmendra S. Modha, the I.B.M. com<br />

puter scientist leading the project, described the<br />

research grandly as “the quest to engineer the mi<br />

nd by reverse-engineering the brain.” The project<br />

embarked on supercomputer simulations intended to<br />

equal the complexity of animal brains — a cat and<br />

then a monkey. In science blogs and online forums,<br />

some neuroscientists sharply criticized I.B.M. fo<br />

r what they regarded as exaggerated claims of what<br />

the project could achieve.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!